Skip to main content
Overall Winner: PolyAI·70/ 100

Otter.ai vs PolyAI

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Otter.ai is valued at $300M — more than 3x PolyAI's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Dead heat — tied on all comparable metrics

Otter.ai

2 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

PolyAI

2 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience
Otter.ai logo
Otter.ai

🇺🇸 United States · Sam Liang

Series BAI AudioEst. 2016

Valuation

$300M

Total Funding

$70M

Awaira Score64/100

150 employees

Full Otter.ai Profile →
Winner
PolyAI logo
PolyAI

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Nikola Mrksic

Series DAI AudioEst. 2017

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$200M

Awaira Score70/100

100-500 employees

Full PolyAI Profile →
Market Context

As AI Audio players, Otter.ai and PolyAI target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Otter.ai at Series B vs PolyAI at Series D — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

The AI Audio sector features both Otter.ai and PolyAI as key players. Otter. PolyAI develops voice AI agents for enterprise customer service, building conversational systems capable of handling complex, open-ended telephone interactions without human escalation.

Otter.ai carries a disclosed valuation of $300M, while PolyAI remains privately valued. In aggregate funding, PolyAI edges ahead at $200M versus Otter.ai's $70M.

Established in 2016, Otter.ai has a modest 1-year head start over PolyAI (2017). Growth stages differ: Otter.ai (Series B) versus PolyAI (Series D), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Headcount tells a story too: Otter.ai has 150 employees and PolyAI has 100-500.

Based in 🇺🇸 United States and 🇬🇧 United Kingdom respectively, Otter.ai and PolyAI tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. The Awaira Score gives PolyAI (70) a notable lead over Otter.ai (64). Otter.ai, led by Sam Liang, and PolyAI, led by Nikola Mrksic, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$300M
N/A
Total Funding
$70M
$200M
Awaira Score
64/100
70/100
Employees
150
100-500
Founded
2016
2017
Stage
Series B
Series D
Otter.aiPolyAI

Funding Velocity

Otter.ai

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round SizeN/A
Funding Span2 yrs

PolyAI

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$50M

Funding History

Otter.ai has completed 2 funding rounds, while PolyAI has gone through 1. Otter.ai's most recent round was a Series A, compared to PolyAI's Series C ($50M). Otter.ai is at Series B while PolyAI is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Otter.ai has about 150 people and PolyAI has around 100-500. They're close in age — Otter.ai started in 2016 and PolyAI in 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Otter.ai operates out of United States and PolyAI from United Kingdom.

Metrics Comparison

MetricOtter.aiPolyAI
💰Valuation
$300M
N/A
📈Total Funding
$70M
$200MWINS
📅Founded
2016
2017WINS
🚀Stage
Series B
Series D
👥Employees
150
100-500
🌍Country
United States
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
AI Audio
AI Audio
Awaira Score
64
70WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: PolyAI has raised $130M more ($200M vs $70M)

📅

Market experience: Otter.ai has 1 year more (founded 2016 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: Otter.ai is at Series B vs PolyAI at Series D

👥

Team size: Otter.ai has 150 employees vs PolyAI's 100-500

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Otter.ai (United States) vs 🇬🇧 PolyAI (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Audio market segment

Awaira Score: PolyAI scores 70/100 vs Otter.ai's 64/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Otter.ai logo

Choose Otter.ai if…

  • More established by valuation ($300M)
  • More market experience — founded in 2016
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Otter
PolyAI logo

Choose PolyAI if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 70/100 vs 64/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $200M
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • PolyAI develops voice AI agents for enterprise customer service, building conversational systems capable of handling complex, open-ended telephone interactions without human escalation

Funding History

Otter.ai raised $70M across 2 rounds. PolyAI raised $200M across 1 round.

Otter.ai

Series A

Jan 2018

Seed

Jan 2016

PolyAI

Series C

Jan 2024

Lead: NVentures

$50M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to PolyAI

NVentures (Nvidia)HedosophiaKhosla VenturesNVentures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Otter.ai vs PolyAI

Is Otter.ai bigger than PolyAI?
Otter.ai has a disclosed valuation of $300M, while PolyAI's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Otter.ai employs 150 people.
Which company raised more funding — Otter.ai or PolyAI?
PolyAI has raised more in total funding at $200M, compared to Otter.ai's $70M — a gap of $130M. Combined, the two companies have completed 3 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
PolyAI leads with an Awaira Score of 70/100, while Otter.ai sits at 64/100. That 6-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Otter.ai vs PolyAI?
Otter.ai was founded by Sam Liang in 2016. PolyAI was founded by Nikola Mrksic in 2017. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Otter.ai do vs PolyAI?
Otter.ai: Otter.ai is an AI-powered transcription and meeting notes platform founded in 2016 and headquartered in the United States. The company develops automatic speech recognition technology that converts audio and video content into searchable, editable text transcripts in real-time. Its core product enables users to record meetings, interviews, lectures, and podcasts, automatically generating accurate transcriptions with speaker identification and timestamps. The platform serves multiple use cases across professional and educational sectors, including legal documentation, medical note-taking, business meetings, and content creation. Otter.ai integrates with popular communication tools like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet, allowing seamless meeting capture and transcription. The company employs machine learning models trained on diverse audio datasets to improve accuracy across different accents, technical terminology, and background noise conditions. As of the latest available data, Otter.ai has raised $63 million in total funding and maintains a valuation of $300 million, placing it in Series B stage. The company competes with established transcription services and emerging AI audio platforms. Its competitive advantages include real-time transcription capabilities, integration ecosystem, and consumer-accessible pricing tiers. The audio intelligence market has experienced significant growth as remote work and digital collaboration expand, positioning Otter.ai within a rapidly expanding sector focused on converting spoken content into structured, searchable data. Otter.ai democratizes transcription through AI-powered real-time speech-to-text technology integrated directly into workplace communication platforms. PolyAI: PolyAI develops voice AI agents for enterprise customer service, building conversational systems capable of handling complex, open-ended telephone interactions without human escalation. The platform is purpose-built for contact center automation, covering verticals including hospitality, banking, retail, and healthcare, with voice agents that understand context, manage multi-turn dialogue, and resolve customer queries end-to-end.\n\nThe company has raised approximately $116 million across multiple rounds including a $50 million Series C, with investors including NVentures, Khosla Ventures, and Point72 Ventures. PolyAI reports that its deployments handle tens of millions of calls annually for clients including Marriott Hotels, FedEx, and several major UK banks, with automation rates frequently exceeding 50 percent of total call volume.\n\nPolyAI competes in the rapidly expanding conversational AI market, which analysts estimate will exceed $40 billion by 2028. The company differentiates from competitors including Nuance, LivePerson, and newer generative AI entrants through its focus on naturalness and resolution quality rather than simple deflection metrics. The founding team holds deep academic roots in dialogue systems research from Cambridge University, giving the platform a technical foundation that is difficult for generalist AI providers to replicate quickly.
Which company was founded first?
Otter.ai got there first, launching in 2016 — that's 1 year of extra runway. PolyAI didn't arrive until 2017. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Otter.ai has about 150 employees; PolyAI has about 100-500. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Otter.ai and PolyAI competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Otter.ai and PolyAI compete in AI Audio, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

PolyAI edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 70, but Otter.ai (64) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

PolyAI has a slight edge on paper, but Otter.ai isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive