Skip to main content

Patsnap vs Databricks

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Patsnap's $1B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Databricks leads on 4 of 5 metrics

Patsnap

1 win

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Databricks

4 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1B
$134B
Total Funding
$300M
$20.2B
Awaira Score
80/100
93/100
Employees
500-1000
6,000
Founded
2007
2013
Stage
Series E
Private
PatsnapDatabricks
Patsnap logo
Patsnap

🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong

Series EAI DataEst. 2007

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$300M

Awaira Score80/100

500-1000 employees

Full Patsnap Profile →
Winner
Databricks logo
Databricks

🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi

PrivateAI DataEst. 2013

Valuation

$134B

Total Funding

$20.2B

Awaira Score93/100

6,000 employees

Full Databricks Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Patsnap in Singapore and Databricks in United States. Different stages (Series E vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within AI Data, Patsnap and Databricks rank among the most closely watched rivals. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning.

Funding & Valuation

The valuation disparity is stark: Databricks at $134B versus Patsnap at $1B, a 134x difference. On the funding front, Databricks has secured $20.2B, outpacing Patsnap's $300M by $19.9B.

Growth Stage

Patsnap (est. 2007) predates Databricks (est. 2013) by 6 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Growth stages differ: Patsnap (Series E) versus Databricks (Private), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Patsnap reports 500-1000 employees and Databricks reports 6,000.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇸🇬 Singapore and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Patsnap and Databricks tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. The Awaira Score gives Databricks (93) a notable lead over Patsnap (80). Under Jeffrey Tiong and Ali Ghodsi respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Patsnap

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Databricks

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$111.4M
Funding Span6.9 yrs

Funding History

Patsnap has completed 1 funding round, while Databricks has gone through 5. Patsnap's most recent round was a Series E of $300M, compared to Databricks's Series E ($250M). Patsnap is at Series E while Databricks is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Databricks has the bigger team at roughly 6,000 people — 12x the size of Patsnap's 500-1000. Patsnap has a 6-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Databricks's 2013. Geographically, they're in different markets — Patsnap operates out of Singapore and Databricks from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricPatsnapDatabricks
💰Valuation
$1B
$134BWINS
📈Total Funding
$300M
$20.2BWINS
📅Founded
2007
2013WINS
🚀Stage
Series E
Private
👥Employees
500-1000
6,000
🌍Country
Singapore
United States
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
80
93WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 134x higher ($134B vs $1B)

📈

Funding gap: Databricks has raised $19.9B more ($20.2B vs $300M)

📅

Market experience: Patsnap has 6 years more (founded 2007 vs 2013)

🚀

Growth stage: Patsnap is at Series E vs Databricks at Private

👥

Team size: Patsnap has 500-1000 employees vs Databricks's 6,000

🌍

Market base: 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore) vs 🇺🇸 Databricks (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Patsnap's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Patsnap logo

Choose Patsnap if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2007
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Databricks logo

Choose Databricks if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($134B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning

Funding History

Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round. Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds.

Patsnap

Series E

Sep 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Databricks

Series E

Aug 2020

$250M

Series D

Apr 2019

$200M

Series C

Dec 2016

$60M

Series B

Jun 2014

$33M

Series A

Sep 2013

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$13.9M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Patsnap

SoftBank Vision Fund 2TencentSequoia Capital China

Unique to Databricks

Andreessen HorowitzSequoia CapitalSalesforce Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Patsnap vs Databricks

Is Patsnap bigger than Databricks?
By valuation, Databricks is the larger company at $134B versus $1B — a 134x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Patsnap employs 500-1000 people while Databricks has 6,000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Patsnap or Databricks?
Databricks has raised more in total funding at $20.2B, compared to Patsnap's $300M — a gap of $19.9B. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Databricks leads with an Awaira Score of 93/100, while Patsnap sits at 80/100. That 13-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Patsnap vs Databricks?
Patsnap was founded by Jeffrey Tiong in 2007. Databricks was founded by Ali Ghodsi in 2013. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Patsnap do vs Databricks?
Patsnap: Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. The Singapore company integrates patent data with scientific literature and chemical structure databases to provide a comprehensive IP and technology intelligence environment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $300 million including a Series E round from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Tencent, and CPE Yunji, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. Patsnap serves over 10,000 companies globally including R&D-intensive organisations in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and consumer electronics that use patent landscape analysis to inform technology strategy and investment decisions.\n\nPatsnap competes in the IP analytics market against Derwent Advancement (Clarivate), Questel Orbit, and Minesoft, as well as general enterprise search platforms that include patent data. Its AI capabilities for patent claim analysis, technology trend extraction, and cross-domain IP search differentiate it from traditional Boolean-search patent databases, enabling R&D strategy questions to be answered through AI-assisted analysis rather than manual patent review. The Singapore base provides access to both the Southeast Asian technology market and a sophisticated legal and financial services market for IP monetisation and licensing analytics. Databricks: Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. The company developed Databricks Lakehouse, which combines data lake and data warehouse capabilities, built on Apache Spark technology. Its platform enables organizations to process large-scale data, build machine learning models, and deploy AI applications through a single interface. The company offers several core products: Databricks SQL for analytics, Databricks Machine Learning for model development, and Databricks Jobs for workflow automation. The platform supports multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Databricks serves enterprises across various industries, with customers including organizations in financial services, technology, and healthcare sectors. As of its latest funding round, Databricks has raised $11.2 billion in total funding and maintains a valuation of $134 billion, positioning it among the highest-valued private AI and data companies. The company achieved Series J funding status, indicating significant capital accumulation and investor confidence. Databricks competes with platforms like Snowflake, Teradata, and cloud-native data solutions from major hyperscalers. The company's growth trajectory reflects strong market demand for integrated data and AI infrastructure, driven by increasing enterprise adoption of machine learning and data-driven decision-making. Databricks unified the traditionally separate data warehouse and data lake approaches through its Lakehouse architecture, creating a single platform for analytics and AI workflows.
Which company was founded first?
Patsnap got there first, launching in 2007 — that's 6 years of extra runway. Databricks didn't arrive until 2013. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Patsnap has about 500-1000 employees; Databricks has about 6,000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Patsnap and Databricks competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Patsnap and Databricks compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Databricks edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 93, but Patsnap (80) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Databricks is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Patsnap has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive