Patsnap vs Databricks
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Patsnap's $1B.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Patsnap
1 win
Databricks
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi
Valuation
$134B
Total Funding
$20.2B
6,000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Patsnap in Singapore and Databricks in United States. Different stages (Series E vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Data, Patsnap and Databricks rank among the most closely watched rivals. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning.
Funding & Valuation
The valuation disparity is stark: Databricks at $134B versus Patsnap at $1B, a 134x difference. On the funding front, Databricks has secured $20.2B, outpacing Patsnap's $300M by $19.9B.
Growth Stage
Patsnap (est. 2007) predates Databricks (est. 2013) by 6 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Growth stages differ: Patsnap (Series E) versus Databricks (Private), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Patsnap reports 500-1000 employees and Databricks reports 6,000.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇸🇬 Singapore and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Patsnap and Databricks tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. The Awaira Score gives Databricks (93) a notable lead over Patsnap (80). Under Jeffrey Tiong and Ali Ghodsi respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Patsnap
Databricks
Funding History
Patsnap has completed 1 funding round, while Databricks has gone through 5. Patsnap's most recent round was a Series E of $300M, compared to Databricks's Series E ($250M). Patsnap is at Series E while Databricks is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Databricks has the bigger team at roughly 6,000 people — 12x the size of Patsnap's 500-1000. Patsnap has a 6-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Databricks's 2013. Geographically, they're in different markets — Patsnap operates out of Singapore and Databricks from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Patsnap | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1B | $134BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $300M | $20.2BWINS |
📅Founded | 2007 | 2013WINS |
🚀Stage | Series E | Private |
👥Employees | 500-1000 | 6,000 |
🌍Country | Singapore | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 93WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 134x higher ($134B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Databricks has raised $19.9B more ($20.2B vs $300M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 6 years more (founded 2007 vs 2013)
Growth stage: Patsnap is at Series E vs Databricks at Private
Team size: Patsnap has 500-1000 employees vs Databricks's 6,000
Market base: 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore) vs 🇺🇸 Databricks (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Patsnap's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Patsnap if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Choose Databricks if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($134B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning
Funding History
Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round. Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds.
Patsnap
Series E
Sep 2021
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2
Databricks
Series E
Aug 2020
Series D
Apr 2019
Series C
Dec 2016
Series B
Jun 2014
Series A
Sep 2013
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Patsnap
Unique to Databricks
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Patsnap vs Databricks
Is Patsnap bigger than Databricks?▾
Which company raised more funding — Patsnap or Databricks?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Patsnap vs Databricks?▾
What does Patsnap do vs Databricks?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Patsnap and Databricks competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Databricks edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 93, but Patsnap (80) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Databricks is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Patsnap has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.