Patsnap vs Weights and Biases
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Two AI Data companies going head to head.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Patsnap
3 wins
Weights and Biases
1 win
Key Numbers
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$250M
300 employees
As AI Data players, Patsnap and Weights and Biases target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Patsnap at Series E vs Weights and Biases at Acquired — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Patsnap and Weights and Biases both operate in AI Data, though their strategies diverge significantly. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development.
Funding & Valuation
Valuations are in a similar range: Weights and Biases at $1.3B and Patsnap at $1B. In aggregate funding, Patsnap edges ahead at $300M versus Weights and Biases's $250M.
Growth Stage
Patsnap (est. 2007) predates Weights and Biases (est. 2017) by 10 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Patsnap is at Series E while Weights and Biases stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Patsnap has 500-1000 employees and Weights and Biases has 300.
Geography & Outlook
Patsnap operates out of 🇸🇬 Singapore while Weights and Biases is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. The Awaira Score reflects a tight race: 80 for Patsnap versus 80 for Weights and Biases. Patsnap, led by Jeffrey Tiong, and Weights and Biases, led by Lukas Biewald, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
Patsnap
Weights and Biases
Funding History
Patsnap has completed 1 funding round, while Weights and Biases has gone through 5. Patsnap's most recent round was a Series E of $300M, compared to Weights and Biases's Series C ($50M). Patsnap is at Series E while Weights and Biases is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Patsnap has about 500-1000 people and Weights and Biases has around 300. Patsnap has a 10-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Patsnap operates out of Singapore and Weights and Biases from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Patsnap | Weights and Biases |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1B | $1.3BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $300MWINS | $250M |
📅Founded | 2007 | 2017WINS |
🚀Stage | Series E | Acquired |
👥Employees | 500-1000 | 300 |
🌍Country | Singapore | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 80 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Weights and Biases is valued 1.3x higher ($1.3B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $50M more ($300M vs $250M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 10 years more (founded 2007 vs 2017)
Growth stage: Patsnap is at Series E vs Weights and Biases at Acquired
Team size: Patsnap has 500-1000 employees vs Weights and Biases's 300
Market base: 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore) vs 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Patsnap if…
Top Pick- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Choose Weights and Biases if…
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.3B)
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Funding History
Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round. Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds.
Patsnap
Series E
Sep 2021
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2
Weights and Biases
Series C
Aug 2023
Lead: Daniel Gross
Series C
Sep 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Mar 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Apr 2019
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2018
Lead: Google Ventures
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Patsnap
Unique to Weights and Biases
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Patsnap vs Weights and Biases
Is Patsnap bigger than Weights and Biases?▾
Which company raised more funding — Patsnap or Weights and Biases?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Patsnap vs Weights and Biases?▾
What does Patsnap do vs Weights and Biases?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Patsnap and Weights and Biases competitors?▾
Bottom Line
It's close. Both Patsnap and Weights and Biases are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.
Who Should You Watch?
This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.