Skip to main content

Patsnap vs Weights and Biases

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Two AI Data companies going head to head.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Patsnap leads on 3 of 5 metrics

Patsnap

3 wins

-Valuation
+Funding
=Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Weights and Biases

1 win

+Valuation
-Funding
=Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1B
$1.3B
Total Funding
$300M
$250M
Awaira Score
80/100
80/100
Employees
500-1000
300
Founded
2007
2017
Stage
Series E
Acquired
PatsnapWeights and Biases
Winner
Patsnap logo
Patsnap

🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong

Series EAI DataEst. 2007

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$300M

Awaira Score80/100

500-1000 employees

Full Patsnap Profile →
Weights and Biases logo
Weights and Biases

🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald

AcquiredAI DataEst. 2017

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$250M

Awaira Score80/100

300 employees

Full Weights and Biases Profile →
Market Context

As AI Data players, Patsnap and Weights and Biases target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Patsnap at Series E vs Weights and Biases at Acquired — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Patsnap and Weights and Biases both operate in AI Data, though their strategies diverge significantly. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development.

Funding & Valuation

Valuations are in a similar range: Weights and Biases at $1.3B and Patsnap at $1B. In aggregate funding, Patsnap edges ahead at $300M versus Weights and Biases's $250M.

Growth Stage

Patsnap (est. 2007) predates Weights and Biases (est. 2017) by 10 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Patsnap is at Series E while Weights and Biases stands at Acquired, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Patsnap has 500-1000 employees and Weights and Biases has 300.

Geography & Outlook

Patsnap operates out of 🇸🇬 Singapore while Weights and Biases is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. The Awaira Score reflects a tight race: 80 for Patsnap versus 80 for Weights and Biases. Patsnap, led by Jeffrey Tiong, and Weights and Biases, led by Lukas Biewald, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Patsnap

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Weights and Biases

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$49M
Funding Span5.6 yrs

Funding History

Patsnap has completed 1 funding round, while Weights and Biases has gone through 5. Patsnap's most recent round was a Series E of $300M, compared to Weights and Biases's Series C ($50M). Patsnap is at Series E while Weights and Biases is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Patsnap has about 500-1000 people and Weights and Biases has around 300. Patsnap has a 10-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Patsnap operates out of Singapore and Weights and Biases from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricPatsnapWeights and Biases
💰Valuation
$1B
$1.3BWINS
📈Total Funding
$300MWINS
$250M
📅Founded
2007
2017WINS
🚀Stage
Series E
Acquired
👥Employees
500-1000
300
🌍Country
Singapore
United States
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
80
80

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Weights and Biases is valued 1.3x higher ($1.3B vs $1B)

📈

Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $50M more ($300M vs $250M)

📅

Market experience: Patsnap has 10 years more (founded 2007 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: Patsnap is at Series E vs Weights and Biases at Acquired

👥

Team size: Patsnap has 500-1000 employees vs Weights and Biases's 300

🌍

Market base: 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore) vs 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Patsnap logo

Choose Patsnap if…

Top Pick
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
  • More market experience — founded in 2007
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Weights and Biases logo

Choose Weights and Biases if…

  • More established by valuation ($1.3B)
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development

Funding History

Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round. Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds.

Patsnap

Series E

Sep 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Weights and Biases

Series C

Aug 2023

Lead: Daniel Gross

$50M

Series C

Sep 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$125M

Series B

Mar 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$50M

Series A

Apr 2019

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$15M

Series A

Jan 2018

Lead: Google Ventures

$5M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Patsnap

SoftBank Vision Fund 2TencentSequoia Capital China

Unique to Weights and Biases

Daniel GrossSequoia CapitalGoogle VenturesSalesforce VenturesAndreessen Horowitz

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Patsnap vs Weights and Biases

Is Patsnap bigger than Weights and Biases?
By valuation, Weights and Biases is the larger company at $1.3B versus $1B — a 1.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Patsnap employs 500-1000 people while Weights and Biases has 300 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Patsnap or Weights and Biases?
Patsnap has raised more in total funding at $300M, compared to Weights and Biases's $250M — a gap of $50M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
It's a dead heat — both Patsnap and Weights and Biases sit at 80/100 on the Awaira Score. That score factors in valuation, funding, stage, headcount, and category.
Who founded Patsnap vs Weights and Biases?
Patsnap was founded by Jeffrey Tiong in 2007. Weights and Biases was founded by Lukas Biewald in 2017. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Patsnap do vs Weights and Biases?
Patsnap: Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. The Singapore company integrates patent data with scientific literature and chemical structure databases to provide a comprehensive IP and technology intelligence environment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $300 million including a Series E round from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Tencent, and CPE Yunji, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. Patsnap serves over 10,000 companies globally including R&D-intensive organisations in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and consumer electronics that use patent landscape analysis to inform technology strategy and investment decisions.\n\nPatsnap competes in the IP analytics market against Derwent Advancement (Clarivate), Questel Orbit, and Minesoft, as well as general enterprise search platforms that include patent data. Its AI capabilities for patent claim analysis, technology trend extraction, and cross-domain IP search differentiate it from traditional Boolean-search patent databases, enabling R&D strategy questions to be answered through AI-assisted analysis rather than manual patent review. The Singapore base provides access to both the Southeast Asian technology market and a sophisticated legal and financial services market for IP monetisation and licensing analytics. Weights and Biases: Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. The company's core product enables data scientists and ML engineers to log, visualize, and compare machine learning experiments, addressing the reproducibility and collaboration challenges inherent in modern AI workflows. The platform integrates with popular ML frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn, allowing teams to track metrics, parameters, and outputs across training runs. W&B's offering extends to model registry capabilities, enabling organizations to version, document, and deploy models systematically. The company serves enterprises across computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning domains. As of its Series C funding stage, Weights and Biases has raised $250 million at a $1.3 billion valuation, positioning it among well-capitalized AI infrastructure startups. The company competes in the ML operations space alongside platforms like Databricks and Neptune, differentiating through its focus on experiment tracking and accessibility to individual practitioners and teams. Notable adoption spans research institutions and technology companies implementing large-scale ML pipelines. The platform's freemium model has facilitated rapid adoption within the academic and startup ecosystems, while enterprise offerings target organizations requiring advanced governance and integration capabilities. Growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for ML operations infrastructure. Weights and Biases occupies a critical position in the ML operations stack by specializing in experiment tracking and model management, essential infrastructure that bridges individual data scientist workflows and enterprise-scale ML deployment.
Which company was founded first?
Patsnap got there first, launching in 2007 — that's 10 years of extra runway. Weights and Biases didn't arrive until 2017. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Patsnap has about 500-1000 employees; Weights and Biases has about 300. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Patsnap and Weights and Biases competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Patsnap and Weights and Biases compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Patsnap and Weights and Biases are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive