Skip to main content

Qdrant vs CoreWeave

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

CoreWeave is valued at $49B — more than 3x Qdrant's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

CoreWeave leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Qdrant

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

CoreWeave

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$49B
Total Funding
$87.8M
$2.4B
Awaira Score
55/100
95/100
Employees
50-200
1800
Founded
2021
2017
Stage
Series A
Public
QdrantCoreWeave
Qdrant logo
Qdrant

🇩🇪 Germany · Andre Yatskov

Series AAI InfrastructureEst. 2021

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$87.8M

Awaira Score55/100

50-200 employees

Full Qdrant Profile →
Winner
CoreWeave logo
CoreWeave

🇺🇸 United States · Michael Intrator

PublicAI InfrastructureEst. 2017

Valuation

$49B

Total Funding

$2.4B

Awaira Score95/100

1800 employees

Full CoreWeave Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Infrastructure space, though from different geographies — Qdrant in Germany and CoreWeave in United States. Different stages (Series A vs Public) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

In the AI Infrastructure market, Qdrant and CoreWeave represent two distinct approaches. Qdrant builds a high-performance vector similarity search engine and managed vector database service optimized for production AI applications requiring fast nearest-neighbor retrieval at scale. CoreWeave is a specialized AI infrastructure provider founded in 2017 that has become a major player in GPU cloud computing.

Funding & Valuation

Only CoreWeave has a public valuation on record ($49B); Qdrant's has not been disclosed. CoreWeave has amassed $2.4B in total funding, far exceeding Qdrant's $87.8M.

Growth Stage

CoreWeave was founded in 2017, 4 years before Qdrant arrived in 2021. Qdrant is at Series A while CoreWeave stands at Public, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Qdrant employs 50-200 people versus CoreWeave's 1800.

Geography & Outlook

Qdrant operates out of 🇩🇪 Germany while CoreWeave is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, CoreWeave leads decisively at 95 compared to Qdrant's 55. Under Andre Yatskov and Michael Intrator respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Qdrant

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$43.9M
Funding Span1.3 yrs

CoreWeave

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$448.2M
Funding Span4.1 yrs

Funding History

Qdrant has completed 2 funding rounds, while CoreWeave has gone through 5. Qdrant's most recent round was a Series A of $72.9M, compared to CoreWeave's IPO ($1.5B). Qdrant is at Series A while CoreWeave is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

CoreWeave has the bigger team at roughly 1800 people — 36x the size of Qdrant's 50-200. CoreWeave has a 4-year head start, founded in 2017 vs Qdrant's 2021. Geographically, they're in different markets — Qdrant operates out of Germany and CoreWeave from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricQdrantCoreWeave
💰Valuation
N/A
$49B
📈Total Funding
$87.8M
$2.4BWINS
📅Founded
2021WINS
2017
🚀Stage
Series A
Public
👥Employees
50-200
1800
🌍Country
Germany
United States
🏷️Category
AI Infrastructure
AI Infrastructure
Awaira Score
55
95WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: CoreWeave has raised $2.3B more ($2.4B vs $87.8M)

📅

Market experience: CoreWeave has 4 years more (founded 2017 vs 2021)

🚀

Growth stage: Qdrant is at Series A vs CoreWeave at Public

👥

Team size: Qdrant has 50-200 employees vs CoreWeave's 1800

🌍

Market base: 🇩🇪 Qdrant (Germany) vs 🇺🇸 CoreWeave (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Infrastructure market segment

Awaira Score: CoreWeave scores 95/100 vs Qdrant's 55/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Qdrant logo

Choose Qdrant if…

  • Germany-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Qdrant builds a high-performance vector similarity search engine and managed vector database service optimized for production AI applications requiring fast nearest-neighbor retrieval at scale
CoreWeave logo

Choose CoreWeave if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 95/100 vs 55/100
  • More established by valuation ($49B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $2.4B
  • More market experience — founded in 2017
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • CoreWeave is a specialized AI infrastructure provider founded in 2017 that has become a major player in GPU cloud computing

Funding History

Qdrant raised $87.8M across 2 rounds. CoreWeave raised $2.4B across 5 rounds.

Qdrant

Series A

Oct 2022

$72.9M

Seed

Jun 2021

$14.9M

CoreWeave

IPO

Mar 2025

$1.5B

Series B

Apr 2023

Lead: Sapphire Ventures

$221M

Series D

Jan 2023

Lead: Sapphire Ventures

$300M

Series C

Jun 2022

Lead: Sapphire Ventures

$200M

Series A

Mar 2021

Lead: Bessemer Venture Partners

$20M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to CoreWeave

Sapphire VenturesBessemer Venture PartnersZetta Venture PartnersBenchmarkGoldman Sachs

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Qdrant vs CoreWeave

Is Qdrant bigger than CoreWeave?
CoreWeave has a disclosed valuation of $49B, while Qdrant's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. CoreWeave employs 1800 people.
Which company raised more funding — Qdrant or CoreWeave?
CoreWeave has raised more in total funding at $2.4B, compared to Qdrant's $87.8M — a gap of $2.3B. Combined, the two companies have completed 7 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
CoreWeave leads with an Awaira Score of 95/100, while Qdrant sits at 55/100. That 40-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Qdrant vs CoreWeave?
Qdrant was founded by Andre Yatskov in 2021. CoreWeave was founded by Michael Intrator in 2017. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Qdrant do vs CoreWeave?
Qdrant: Qdrant builds a high-performance vector similarity search engine and managed vector database service optimized for production AI applications requiring fast nearest-neighbor retrieval at scale. The engine is implemented in Rust for memory efficiency and throughput, and supports filtered vector search, payload indexing, and hybrid dense-sparse retrieval in a single system.\n\nThe company raised approximately 28 million USD and serves AI engineering teams across Europe and North America building recommendation systems, semantic search, computer vision pipelines, and RAG-based applications that require low-latency retrieval over large embedding collections. Qdrant is open-source with a managed cloud offering, following the commercial open-source model common in developer infrastructure.\n\nThe vector database market is consolidating around a handful of well-funded players as enterprises standardize their AI data stacks and look for production-grade infrastructure with strong SLAs and support. Qdrant differentiates from pure-cloud competitors through its Rust-based performance characteristics and its strong adoption in European markets where data sovereignty concerns make self-hosted options more commercially attractive than US-operated managed services. CoreWeave: CoreWeave is a specialized AI infrastructure provider founded in 2017 that has become a major player in GPU cloud computing. The company operates a global network of data centers optimized for artificial intelligence and machine learning workloads, offering on-demand access to high-performance GPUs and compute resources. CoreWeave's platform enables enterprises and AI developers to train large language models, run inference workloads, and deploy machine learning applications without building proprietary infrastructure. The company serves organizations across industries including enterprise AI, research institutions, and cloud-native startups requiring flexible, scalable compute capacity. CoreWeave distinguishes itself through customized infrastructure solutions tailored to GPU-intensive applications, offering various processor configurations from NVIDIA and AMD architectures. The company went public in 2025 and currently carries a valuation of $42.0 billion with total funding of $2.38 billion, reflecting substantial investor confidence in AI infrastructure demand. CoreWeave competes directly with hyperscalers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure in the GPU compute space, alongside specialized competitors such as Lambda Labs and Crusoe Energy. The company's growth trajectory reflects the accelerating demand for accessible GPU computing as organizations scale their AI capabilities. Its business model capitalizes on the infrastructure bottleneck in AI deployment, positioning it as a critical enabler of AI adoption across enterprise sectors. CoreWeave's public status and $42B valuation reflect recognition of GPU infrastructure as fundamental to AI scaling, distinct from traditional cloud computing markets.
Which company was founded first?
CoreWeave got there first, launching in 2017 — that's 4 years of extra runway. Qdrant didn't arrive until 2021. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Qdrant has about 50-200 employees; CoreWeave has about 1800. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Qdrant and CoreWeave competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Qdrant and CoreWeave compete in AI Infrastructure, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

CoreWeave has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 95 vs Qdrant's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and strategic focus.

Who Should You Watch?

CoreWeave is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Qdrant has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive