Scatter Lab vs Cogent Labs
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Cogent Labs leads in funding with $50M, well ahead of Scatter Lab's $15M.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Scatter Lab
1 win
Cogent Labs
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇰🇷 South Korea · Kim Jong-yoon
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$15M
1-50 employees
🇯🇵 Japan · Andrew Hall
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$50M
100-500 employees
Both companies compete in the NLP space, though from different geographies — Scatter Lab in South Korea and Cogent Labs in Japan. Different stages (Series B vs Series C) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the NLP market, Scatter Lab and Cogent Labs represent two distinct approaches. Scatter Lab develops emotional AI and conversational applications in Korean, most notably Luda, a social chatbot designed for conversational companionship that engages users in casual, emotionally warm dialogue. Cogent Labs develops AI document processing and text analysis software with specialised capabilities in Japanese character recognition, handwritten text, and structured document data extraction, targeting the Japanese financial services, insurance, and government sectors where large volumes of handwritten and mixed-format documents require processing with high accuracy in Japanese scripts including kanji, hiragana, and katakana.
Funding & Valuation
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation. On the funding front, Cogent Labs has secured $50M, outpacing Scatter Lab's $15M by $35M.
Growth Stage
Scatter Lab was founded in 2014, 2 years before Cogent Labs arrived in 2016. Growth stages differ: Scatter Lab (Series B) versus Cogent Labs (Series C), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: Scatter Lab employs 1-50 people versus Cogent Labs's 100-500.
Geography & Outlook
Scatter Lab operates out of 🇰🇷 South Korea while Cogent Labs is based in 🇯🇵 Japan, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Cogent Labs leads decisively at 55 compared to Scatter Lab's 38. Under Kim Jong-yoon and Andrew Hall respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Scatter Lab
Cogent Labs
Funding History
Scatter Lab has completed 3 funding rounds, while Cogent Labs has gone through 4. Scatter Lab's most recent round was a Series B of $10.5M, compared to Cogent Labs's Series C ($27.5M). Scatter Lab is at Series B while Cogent Labs is at Series C — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Cogent Labs has the bigger team at roughly 100-500 people — 100x the size of Scatter Lab's 1-50. They're close in age — Scatter Lab started in 2014 and Cogent Labs in 2016. Geographically, they're in different markets — Scatter Lab operates out of South Korea and Cogent Labs from Japan.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Scatter Lab | Cogent Labs |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $15M | $50MWINS |
📅Founded | 2014 | 2016WINS |
🚀Stage | Series B | Series C |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 100-500 |
🌍Country | South Korea | Japan |
🏷️Category | NLP | NLP |
⭐Awaira Score | 38 | 55WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Cogent Labs has raised $35M more ($50M vs $15M)
Market experience: Scatter Lab has 2 years more (founded 2014 vs 2016)
Growth stage: Scatter Lab is at Series B vs Cogent Labs at Series C
Team size: Scatter Lab has 1-50 employees vs Cogent Labs's 100-500
Market base: 🇰🇷 Scatter Lab (South Korea) vs 🇯🇵 Cogent Labs (Japan)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the NLP market segment
Awaira Score: Cogent Labs scores 55/100 vs Scatter Lab's 38/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Scatter Lab if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2014
- ✓South Korea-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Scatter Lab develops emotional AI and conversational applications in Korean, most notably Luda, a social chatbot designed for conversational companionship that engages users in casual, emotionally warm dialogue
Choose Cogent Labs if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 55/100 vs 38/100
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $50M
- ✓Japan-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Cogent Labs develops AI document processing and text analysis software with specialised capabilities in Japanese character recognition, handwritten text, and structured document data extraction, targeting the Japanese financial services, insurance, and government sectors where large volumes of handwritten and mixed-format documents require processing with high accuracy in Japanese scripts including kanji, hiragana, and katakana
Funding History
Scatter Lab raised $15M across 3 rounds. Cogent Labs raised $50M across 4 rounds.
Scatter Lab
Series B
Feb 2017
Series A
Oct 2015
Seed
Jun 2014
Cogent Labs
Series C
Jun 2020
Series B
Feb 2019
Series A
Oct 2017
Seed
Jun 2016
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Scatter Lab vs Cogent Labs
Is Scatter Lab bigger than Cogent Labs?▾
Which company raised more funding — Scatter Lab or Cogent Labs?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Scatter Lab vs Cogent Labs?▾
What does Scatter Lab do vs Cogent Labs?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Scatter Lab and Cogent Labs competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Cogent Labs has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 55 vs Scatter Lab's 38. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Cogent Labs is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Scatter Lab has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.