Overall Winner: Improbable·68/ 100

Secondmind vs Improbable

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

S
Secondmind

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Eric Bax

Series AML PlatformEst. 2019

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$25M

45
Awaira Score45/100

1-50 employees

Full Secondmind Profile →
Winner
I
Improbable

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Herman Narula

Series CML PlatformEst. 2012

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$700M

68
Awaira Score68/100

500-1000 employees

Full Improbable Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Secondmind and Improbable compete directly in the ML Platform space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Secondmind develops Bayesian machine learning optimisation technology for engineering applications, with a primary focus on automotive powertrain and vehicle systems calibration. Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development.

Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation at this time. On the funding side, Improbable has raised $700M in total — $675M more than Secondmind's $25M.

Improbable has 7 years more market experience, having been founded in 2012 compared to Secondmind's 2019 founding. In terms of growth stage, Secondmind is at Series A while Improbable is at Series C — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Both companies are headquartered in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, competing for the same regional talent and customer base. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Improbable leads with a score of 68, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricSecondmindImprobable
💰Valuation
N/A
N/A
📈Total Funding
$25M
$700MWINS
📅Founded
2019WINS
2012
🚀Stage
Series A
Series C
👥Employees
1-50
500-1000
🌍Country
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
ML Platform
ML Platform
Awaira Score
45
68WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Improbable has raised $675M more ($700M vs $25M)

📅

Market experience: Improbable has 7 years more (founded 2012 vs 2019)

🚀

Growth stage: Secondmind is at Series A vs Improbable at Series C

👥

Team size: Secondmind has 1-50 employees vs Improbable's 500-1000

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the ML Platform market segment

Awaira Score: Improbable scores 68/100 vs Secondmind's 45/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

S

Choose Secondmind if…

  • Secondmind develops Bayesian machine learning optimisation technology for engineering applications, with a primary focus on automotive powertrain and vehicle systems calibration
I

Choose Improbable if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 45/100
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
  • More market experience — founded in 2012
  • Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Secondmind vs Improbable

Is Secondmind bigger than Improbable?
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation, making a definitive size comparison difficult. Secondmind employs 1-50 people, while Improbable has 500-1000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Secondmind or Improbable?
Improbable has raised more in total funding at $700M, compared to Secondmind's $25M — a gap of $675M.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Improbable holds the higher Awaira Score at 68/100, compared to Secondmind's 45/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 23-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Secondmind vs Improbable?
Secondmind was founded by Eric Bax in 2019. Improbable was founded by Herman Narula in 2012. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Secondmind do vs Improbable?
Secondmind: Secondmind develops Bayesian machine learning optimisation technology for engineering applications, with a primary focus on automotive powertrain and vehicle systems calibration. The Cambridge company builds probabilistic machine learning tools that help automotive engineers optimise complex, multi-variable systems such as engine management, transmission control, and electrification systems with fewer physical experiments and less calibration time than traditional approaches.\n\nThe company raised approximately $25 million in a Series A round and acquired Prowler.io, a multi-agent reinforcement learning startup from Cambridge, in 2021 to expand its AI research capabilities. Secondmind customers include major automotive OEMs using the platform to reduce the number of dyno tests required for powertrain calibration, translating directly into reduced development costs and faster time-to-production for new vehicle programmes.\n\nSeconmind operates in the engineering AI optimisation market, competing with specialist automotive AI vendors and general-purpose Bayesian optimisation tools. The automotive calibration market is driven by increasing powertrain complexity as the industry transitions to hybrid and electric architectures, which require calibrating interactions between internal combustion engines, electric motors, and battery management systems that generate dramatically more control parameters than traditional powertrains. Cambridge University research partnerships provide the company a continuing source of methodological development in Bayesian and probabilistic machine learning. Improbable: Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development. The London company built SpatialOS, a cloud platform for running distributed simulations of large, persistent virtual worlds, and has applied simulation capabilities to defence, urban planning, and entertainment applications.\n\nThe company raised approximately $700 million including a landmark $502 million SoftBank round in 2017 that was one of the largest venture rounds in European technology history. Improbable has undergone multiple strategic pivots, moving from gaming infrastructure to defence simulation contracts with clients including the UK Ministry of Defence, which uses simulation environments for training and wargaming. The company also built MSquared, a metaverse interoperability network, before refocusing on defence and AI simulation work.\n\nImprobable operates in an AI simulation market where demand from defence agencies, autonomous vehicle companies, and robotics firms has grown substantially. The company competes with simulation platforms from Epic Games (Unreal Engine), NVIDIA (Omniverse), and specialist defence simulation vendors. Its SoftBank backing and large cash reserves have enabled it to survive multiple market pivot cycles that would have ended less well-funded companies, and its current focus on AI-powered synthetic data generation for defence represents a growing government budget category.
Which company was founded first?
Improbable was founded first in 2012, giving it 7 years of additional market experience. Secondmind was founded later in 2019. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Secondmind has approximately 1-50 employees, while Improbable has approximately 500-1000. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Secondmind and Improbable competitors?
Yes, Secondmind and Improbable are direct competitors — both operate in the ML Platform space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.