Secondmind vs Improbable
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Improbable leads in funding with $700M, well ahead of Secondmind's $25M.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Secondmind
0 wins
Improbable
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Eric Bax
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$25M
1-50 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Herman Narula
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$700M
500-1000 employees
This is a head-to-head contest: both operate in ML Platform and share a home market in United Kingdom. Different stages (Series A vs Series C) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Secondmind and Improbable are direct competitors in ML Platform. Secondmind develops Bayesian machine learning optimisation technology for engineering applications, with a primary focus on automotive powertrain and vehicle systems calibration. Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development.
Funding & Valuation
Neither company has publicly disclosed a valuation. Improbable has amassed $700M in total funding, far exceeding Secondmind's $25M.
Growth Stage
With a 7-year head start, Improbable (founded 2012) has had considerably more time to mature than Secondmind (2019). Growth stages differ: Secondmind (Series A) versus Improbable (Series C), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: Secondmind employs 1-50 people versus Improbable's 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Headquartered in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, both Secondmind and Improbable draw from the same local ecosystem of talent and capital. A 23-point gap on the Awaira Score (Improbable: 68, Secondmind: 45) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Under Eric Bax and Herman Narula respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Secondmind
Improbable
Funding History
Secondmind has completed 2 funding rounds, while Improbable has gone through 2. Secondmind's most recent round was a Series A of $20.8M, compared to Improbable's Series B ($502M). Secondmind is at Series A while Improbable is at Series C — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Improbable has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 500x the size of Secondmind's 1-50. Improbable has a 7-year head start, founded in 2012 vs Secondmind's 2019. Both are based in United Kingdom.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Secondmind | Improbable |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | N/A |
📈Total Funding | $25M | $700MWINS |
📅Founded | 2019WINS | 2012 |
🚀Stage | Series A | Series C |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | United Kingdom | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | ML Platform | ML Platform |
⭐Awaira Score | 45 | 68WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Improbable has raised $675M more ($700M vs $25M)
Market experience: Improbable has 7 years more (founded 2012 vs 2019)
Growth stage: Secondmind is at Series A vs Improbable at Series C
Team size: Secondmind has 1-50 employees vs Improbable's 500-1000
Direct competitors: Both operate in the ML Platform market segment
Awaira Score: Improbable scores 68/100 vs Secondmind's 45/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Secondmind if…
- ✓Secondmind develops Bayesian machine learning optimisation technology for engineering applications, with a primary focus on automotive powertrain and vehicle systems calibration
Choose Improbable if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 68/100 vs 45/100
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $700M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2012
- ✓Improbable develops large-scale simulation technology and virtual world infrastructure, originally focused on cloud-distributed game server simulation and subsequently pivoting to AI-powered synthetic environment generation and metaverse platform development
Funding History
Secondmind raised $25M across 2 rounds. Improbable raised $700M across 2 rounds.
Secondmind
Series A
Oct 2020
Seed
Jun 2019
Improbable
Series B
May 2017
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund
Series A
Mar 2015
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Improbable
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Secondmind vs Improbable
Is Secondmind bigger than Improbable?▾
Which company raised more funding — Secondmind or Improbable?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Secondmind vs Improbable?▾
What does Secondmind do vs Improbable?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Secondmind and Improbable competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Improbable has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 68 vs Secondmind's 45. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Improbable is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Secondmind has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.