Tabnine vs Cursor
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Cursor is valued at $29.3B — more than 3x Tabnine's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Tabnine
2 wins
Cursor
2 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Dror Weiss
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$102M
75 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Michael Truell
Valuation
$29.3B
Total Funding
$3.4B
50 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Dev Tools space, though from different geographies — Tabnine in Israel and Cursor in United States. Different stages (Series B vs Series D) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the AI Dev Tools market, Tabnine and Cursor represent two distinct approaches. Tabnine is an AI-powered code completion platform founded in 2013 and based in Israel. Cursor is an AI-powered code editor founded in 2022 that has rapidly become a significant player in the AI developer tools market.
Funding & Valuation
Only Cursor has a public valuation on record ($29.3B); Tabnine's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Cursor has secured $3.4B, outpacing Tabnine's $102M by $3.3B.
Growth Stage
With a 9-year head start, Tabnine (founded 2013) has had considerably more time to mature than Cursor (2022). Tabnine is at Series B while Cursor stands at Series D, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, Tabnine reports 75 employees and Cursor reports 50.
Geography & Outlook
Tabnine operates out of 🇮🇱 Israel while Cursor is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Cursor scores 87 on Awaira's composite index versus Tabnine's 62, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Dror Weiss and Michael Truell respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Tabnine
Cursor
Funding History
Tabnine has completed 2 funding rounds, while Cursor has gone through 3. Tabnine's most recent round was a Series B of $35M, compared to Cursor's Series D ($2.3B). Tabnine is at Series B while Cursor is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Tabnine has about 75 people and Cursor has around 50. Tabnine has a 9-year head start, founded in 2013 vs Cursor's 2022. Geographically, they're in different markets — Tabnine operates out of Israel and Cursor from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Tabnine | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $29.3B |
📈Total Funding | $102M | $3.4BWINS |
📅Founded | 2013 | 2022WINS |
🚀Stage | Series B | Series D |
👥Employees | 75 | 50 |
🌍Country | Israel | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Dev Tools | AI Dev Tools |
⭐Awaira Score | 62 | 87WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Cursor has raised $3.3B more ($3.4B vs $102M)
Market experience: Tabnine has 9 years more (founded 2013 vs 2022)
Growth stage: Tabnine is at Series B vs Cursor at Series D
Team size: Tabnine has 75 employees vs Cursor's 50
Market base: 🇮🇱 Tabnine (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Cursor (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Dev Tools market segment
Awaira Score: Cursor scores 87/100 vs Tabnine's 62/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Tabnine if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2013
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Tabnine is an AI-powered code completion platform founded in 2013 and based in Israel
Choose Cursor if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 87/100 vs 62/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($29.3B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $3.4B
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Cursor is an AI-powered code editor founded in 2022 that has rapidly become a significant player in the AI developer tools market
Funding History
Tabnine raised $102M across 2 rounds. Cursor raised $3.4B across 3 rounds.
Tabnine
Series B
Jan 2022
Lead: Bessemer Venture Partners
Series A
Jun 2021
Lead: Accel
Cursor
Series D
Nov 2025
Series A
Aug 2024
Lead: Thrive Capital
Seed
Jan 2022
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Tabnine
Unique to Cursor
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Tabnine vs Cursor
Is Tabnine bigger than Cursor?▾
Which company raised more funding — Tabnine or Cursor?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Tabnine vs Cursor?▾
What does Tabnine do vs Cursor?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Tabnine and Cursor competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Cursor has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 87 vs Tabnine's 62. The difference comes down to funding depth and strategic focus.
Who Should You Watch?
Cursor is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Tabnine has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.