Skip to main content

Weights and Biases vs Databricks

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Weights and Biases's $1.3B.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Databricks leads on 5 of 5 metrics

Weights and Biases

0 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Databricks

5 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$134B
Total Funding
$250M
$20.2B
Awaira Score
80/100
93/100
Employees
300
6,000
Founded
2017
2013
Stage
Acquired
Private
Weights and BiasesDatabricks
Weights and Biases logo
Weights and Biases

🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald

AcquiredAI DataEst. 2017

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$250M

Awaira Score80/100

300 employees

Full Weights and Biases Profile →
Winner
Databricks logo
Databricks

🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi

PrivateAI DataEst. 2013

Valuation

$134B

Total Funding

$20.2B

Awaira Score93/100

6,000 employees

Full Databricks Profile →
Market Context

This is a head-to-head contest: both operate in AI Data and share a home market in United States. Different stages (Acquired vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

In the AI Data market, Weights and Biases and Databricks represent two distinct approaches. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning.

Funding & Valuation

Databricks commands a $134B valuation — roughly 107.2x that of Weights and Biases at $1.3B, a gap that underscores their different scales. Databricks has amassed $20.2B in total funding, far exceeding Weights and Biases's $250M.

Growth Stage

Databricks was founded in 2013, 4 years before Weights and Biases arrived in 2017. Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Databricks stands at Private, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Weights and Biases employs 300 people versus Databricks's 6,000.

Geography & Outlook

Both companies are headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, competing for the same regional talent pool and customer base. Awaira rates Databricks at 93 and Weights and Biases at 80, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Under Lukas Biewald and Ali Ghodsi respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Weights and Biases

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$49M
Funding Span5.6 yrs

Databricks

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$111.4M
Funding Span6.9 yrs

Funding History

Weights and Biases has completed 5 funding rounds, while Databricks has gone through 5. Weights and Biases's most recent round was a Series C of $50M, compared to Databricks's Series E ($250M). Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Databricks is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Databricks has the bigger team at roughly 6,000 people — 20x the size of Weights and Biases's 300. Databricks has a 4-year head start, founded in 2013 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Both are based in United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricWeights and BiasesDatabricks
💰Valuation
$1.3B
$134BWINS
📈Total Funding
$250M
$20.2BWINS
📅Founded
2017WINS
2013
🚀Stage
Acquired
Private
👥Employees
300
6,000
🌍Country
United States
United States
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
80
93WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 107.2x higher ($134B vs $1.3B)

📈

Funding gap: Databricks has raised $20B more ($20.2B vs $250M)

📅

Market experience: Databricks has 4 years more (founded 2013 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: Weights and Biases is at Acquired vs Databricks at Private

👥

Team size: Weights and Biases has 300 employees vs Databricks's 6,000

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Weights and Biases's 80/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Weights and Biases logo

Choose Weights and Biases if…

  • Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Databricks logo

Choose Databricks if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
  • More established by valuation ($134B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
  • More market experience — founded in 2013
  • Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning

Funding History

Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds. Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds.

Weights and Biases

Series C

Aug 2023

Lead: Daniel Gross

$50M

Series C

Sep 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$125M

Series B

Mar 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$50M

Series A

Apr 2019

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$15M

Series A

Jan 2018

Lead: Google Ventures

$5M

Databricks

Series E

Aug 2020

$250M

Series D

Apr 2019

$200M

Series C

Dec 2016

$60M

Series B

Jun 2014

$33M

Series A

Sep 2013

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$13.9M

Investor Comparison

Shared Investors3
Sequoia CapitalSalesforce VenturesAndreessen Horowitz

Unique to Weights and Biases

Daniel GrossGoogle Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Weights and Biases vs Databricks

Is Weights and Biases bigger than Databricks?
By valuation, Databricks is the larger company at $134B versus $1.3B — a 107.2x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Weights and Biases employs 300 people while Databricks has 6,000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Weights and Biases or Databricks?
Databricks has raised more in total funding at $20.2B, compared to Weights and Biases's $250M — a gap of $20B. Combined, the two companies have completed 10 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Databricks leads with an Awaira Score of 93/100, while Weights and Biases sits at 80/100. That 13-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Weights and Biases vs Databricks?
Weights and Biases was founded by Lukas Biewald in 2017. Databricks was founded by Ali Ghodsi in 2013. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Weights and Biases do vs Databricks?
Weights and Biases: Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. The company's core product enables data scientists and ML engineers to log, visualize, and compare machine learning experiments, addressing the reproducibility and collaboration challenges inherent in modern AI workflows. The platform integrates with popular ML frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn, allowing teams to track metrics, parameters, and outputs across training runs. W&B's offering extends to model registry capabilities, enabling organizations to version, document, and deploy models systematically. The company serves enterprises across computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning domains. As of its Series C funding stage, Weights and Biases has raised $250 million at a $1.3 billion valuation, positioning it among well-capitalized AI infrastructure startups. The company competes in the ML operations space alongside platforms like Databricks and Neptune, differentiating through its focus on experiment tracking and accessibility to individual practitioners and teams. Notable adoption spans research institutions and technology companies implementing large-scale ML pipelines. The platform's freemium model has facilitated rapid adoption within the academic and startup ecosystems, while enterprise offerings target organizations requiring advanced governance and integration capabilities. Growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for ML operations infrastructure. Weights and Biases occupies a critical position in the ML operations stack by specializing in experiment tracking and model management, essential infrastructure that bridges individual data scientist workflows and enterprise-scale ML deployment. Databricks: Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. The company developed Databricks Lakehouse, which combines data lake and data warehouse capabilities, built on Apache Spark technology. Its platform enables organizations to process large-scale data, build machine learning models, and deploy AI applications through a single interface. The company offers several core products: Databricks SQL for analytics, Databricks Machine Learning for model development, and Databricks Jobs for workflow automation. The platform supports multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Databricks serves enterprises across various industries, with customers including organizations in financial services, technology, and healthcare sectors. As of its latest funding round, Databricks has raised $11.2 billion in total funding and maintains a valuation of $134 billion, positioning it among the highest-valued private AI and data companies. The company achieved Series J funding status, indicating significant capital accumulation and investor confidence. Databricks competes with platforms like Snowflake, Teradata, and cloud-native data solutions from major hyperscalers. The company's growth trajectory reflects strong market demand for integrated data and AI infrastructure, driven by increasing enterprise adoption of machine learning and data-driven decision-making. Databricks unified the traditionally separate data warehouse and data lake approaches through its Lakehouse architecture, creating a single platform for analytics and AI workflows.
Which company was founded first?
Databricks got there first, launching in 2013 — that's 4 years of extra runway. Weights and Biases didn't arrive until 2017. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Weights and Biases has about 300 employees; Databricks has about 6,000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Weights and Biases and Databricks competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Weights and Biases and Databricks compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Databricks edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 93, but Weights and Biases (80) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Databricks is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Weights and Biases has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive