Weights and Biases vs Databricks
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Weights and Biases's $1.3B.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Weights and Biases
0 wins
Databricks
5 wins
Key Numbers
🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$250M
300 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi
Valuation
$134B
Total Funding
$20.2B
6,000 employees
This is a head-to-head contest: both operate in AI Data and share a home market in United States. Different stages (Acquired vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the AI Data market, Weights and Biases and Databricks represent two distinct approaches. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning.
Funding & Valuation
Databricks commands a $134B valuation — roughly 107.2x that of Weights and Biases at $1.3B, a gap that underscores their different scales. Databricks has amassed $20.2B in total funding, far exceeding Weights and Biases's $250M.
Growth Stage
Databricks was founded in 2013, 4 years before Weights and Biases arrived in 2017. Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Databricks stands at Private, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Weights and Biases employs 300 people versus Databricks's 6,000.
Geography & Outlook
Both companies are headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, competing for the same regional talent pool and customer base. Awaira rates Databricks at 93 and Weights and Biases at 80, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Under Lukas Biewald and Ali Ghodsi respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Weights and Biases
Databricks
Funding History
Weights and Biases has completed 5 funding rounds, while Databricks has gone through 5. Weights and Biases's most recent round was a Series C of $50M, compared to Databricks's Series E ($250M). Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Databricks is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Databricks has the bigger team at roughly 6,000 people — 20x the size of Weights and Biases's 300. Databricks has a 4-year head start, founded in 2013 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Both are based in United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Weights and Biases | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1.3B | $134BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $250M | $20.2BWINS |
📅Founded | 2017WINS | 2013 |
🚀Stage | Acquired | Private |
👥Employees | 300 | 6,000 |
🌍Country | United States | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 93WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Databricks is valued 107.2x higher ($134B vs $1.3B)
Funding gap: Databricks has raised $20B more ($20.2B vs $250M)
Market experience: Databricks has 4 years more (founded 2013 vs 2017)
Growth stage: Weights and Biases is at Acquired vs Databricks at Private
Team size: Weights and Biases has 300 employees vs Databricks's 6,000
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Weights and Biases's 80/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Weights and Biases if…
- ✓Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Choose Databricks if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 80/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($134B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2013
- ✓Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning
Funding History
Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds. Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds.
Weights and Biases
Series C
Aug 2023
Lead: Daniel Gross
Series C
Sep 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Mar 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Apr 2019
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2018
Lead: Google Ventures
Databricks
Series E
Aug 2020
Series D
Apr 2019
Series C
Dec 2016
Series B
Jun 2014
Series A
Sep 2013
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Investor Comparison
Unique to Weights and Biases
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Weights and Biases vs Databricks
Is Weights and Biases bigger than Databricks?▾
Which company raised more funding — Weights and Biases or Databricks?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Weights and Biases vs Databricks?▾
What does Weights and Biases do vs Databricks?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Weights and Biases and Databricks competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Databricks edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 93, but Weights and Biases (80) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Databricks is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Weights and Biases has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.