Skip to main content

Weights and Biases vs Patsnap

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Two AI Data companies going head to head.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Patsnap leads on 3 of 5 metrics

Weights and Biases

1 win

+Valuation
-Funding
=Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Patsnap

3 wins

-Valuation
+Funding
=Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$1B
Total Funding
$250M
$300M
Awaira Score
80/100
80/100
Employees
300
500-1000
Founded
2017
2007
Stage
Acquired
Series E
Weights and BiasesPatsnap
Winner
Weights and Biases logo
Weights and Biases

🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald

AcquiredAI DataEst. 2017

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$250M

Awaira Score80/100

300 employees

Full Weights and Biases Profile →
Patsnap logo
Patsnap

🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong

Series EAI DataEst. 2007

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$300M

Awaira Score80/100

500-1000 employees

Full Patsnap Profile →
Market Context

As AI Data players, Weights and Biases and Patsnap target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Weights and Biases at Acquired vs Patsnap at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

The AI Data sector features both Weights and Biases and Patsnap as key players. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.

Funding & Valuation

Valuations are in a similar range: Weights and Biases at $1.3B and Patsnap at $1B. Funding totals are closer: Patsnap at $300M compared to Weights and Biases's $250M.

Growth Stage

With a 10-year head start, Patsnap (founded 2007) has had considerably more time to mature than Weights and Biases (2017). Stage-wise, Weights and Biases is classified as Acquired and Patsnap as Series E, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. On headcount, Weights and Biases reports 300 employees and Patsnap reports 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇺🇸 United States and 🇸🇬 Singapore respectively, Weights and Biases and Patsnap tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, the gap is minimal — Weights and Biases scores 80 and Patsnap scores 80. Weights and Biases, led by Lukas Biewald, and Patsnap, led by Jeffrey Tiong, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Weights and Biases

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$49M
Funding Span5.6 yrs

Patsnap

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Funding History

Weights and Biases has completed 5 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. Weights and Biases's most recent round was a Series C of $50M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Weights and Biases has about 300 people and Patsnap has around 500-1000. Patsnap has a 10-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Weights and Biases operates out of United States and Patsnap from Singapore.

Metrics Comparison

MetricWeights and BiasesPatsnap
💰Valuation
$1.3BWINS
$1B
📈Total Funding
$250M
$300MWINS
📅Founded
2017WINS
2007
🚀Stage
Acquired
Series E
👥Employees
300
500-1000
🌍Country
United States
Singapore
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
80
80

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Weights and Biases is valued 1.3x higher ($1.3B vs $1B)

📈

Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $50M more ($300M vs $250M)

📅

Market experience: Patsnap has 10 years more (founded 2007 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: Weights and Biases is at Acquired vs Patsnap at Series E

👥

Team size: Weights and Biases has 300 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Weights and Biases logo

Choose Weights and Biases if…

Top Pick
  • More established by valuation ($1.3B)
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Patsnap logo

Choose Patsnap if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
  • More market experience — founded in 2007
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents

Funding History

Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.

Weights and Biases

Series C

Aug 2023

Lead: Daniel Gross

$50M

Series C

Sep 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$125M

Series B

Mar 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$50M

Series A

Apr 2019

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$15M

Series A

Jan 2018

Lead: Google Ventures

$5M

Patsnap

Series E

Sep 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Weights and Biases

Daniel GrossSequoia CapitalGoogle VenturesSalesforce VenturesAndreessen Horowitz

Unique to Patsnap

SoftBank Vision Fund 2TencentSequoia Capital China

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Weights and Biases vs Patsnap

Is Weights and Biases bigger than Patsnap?
By valuation, Weights and Biases is the larger company at $1.3B versus $1B — a 1.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Weights and Biases employs 300 people while Patsnap has 500-1000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Weights and Biases or Patsnap?
Patsnap has raised more in total funding at $300M, compared to Weights and Biases's $250M — a gap of $50M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
It's a dead heat — both Weights and Biases and Patsnap sit at 80/100 on the Awaira Score. That score factors in valuation, funding, stage, headcount, and category.
Who founded Weights and Biases vs Patsnap?
Weights and Biases was founded by Lukas Biewald in 2017. Patsnap was founded by Jeffrey Tiong in 2007. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Weights and Biases do vs Patsnap?
Weights and Biases: Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. The company's core product enables data scientists and ML engineers to log, visualize, and compare machine learning experiments, addressing the reproducibility and collaboration challenges inherent in modern AI workflows. The platform integrates with popular ML frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn, allowing teams to track metrics, parameters, and outputs across training runs. W&B's offering extends to model registry capabilities, enabling organizations to version, document, and deploy models systematically. The company serves enterprises across computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning domains. As of its Series C funding stage, Weights and Biases has raised $250 million at a $1.3 billion valuation, positioning it among well-capitalized AI infrastructure startups. The company competes in the ML operations space alongside platforms like Databricks and Neptune, differentiating through its focus on experiment tracking and accessibility to individual practitioners and teams. Notable adoption spans research institutions and technology companies implementing large-scale ML pipelines. The platform's freemium model has facilitated rapid adoption within the academic and startup ecosystems, while enterprise offerings target organizations requiring advanced governance and integration capabilities. Growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for ML operations infrastructure. Weights and Biases occupies a critical position in the ML operations stack by specializing in experiment tracking and model management, essential infrastructure that bridges individual data scientist workflows and enterprise-scale ML deployment. Patsnap: Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. The Singapore company integrates patent data with scientific literature and chemical structure databases to provide a comprehensive IP and technology intelligence environment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $300 million including a Series E round from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Tencent, and CPE Yunji, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. Patsnap serves over 10,000 companies globally including R&D-intensive organisations in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and consumer electronics that use patent landscape analysis to inform technology strategy and investment decisions.\n\nPatsnap competes in the IP analytics market against Derwent Advancement (Clarivate), Questel Orbit, and Minesoft, as well as general enterprise search platforms that include patent data. Its AI capabilities for patent claim analysis, technology trend extraction, and cross-domain IP search differentiate it from traditional Boolean-search patent databases, enabling R&D strategy questions to be answered through AI-assisted analysis rather than manual patent review. The Singapore base provides access to both the Southeast Asian technology market and a sophisticated legal and financial services market for IP monetisation and licensing analytics.
Which company was founded first?
Patsnap got there first, launching in 2007 — that's 10 years of extra runway. Weights and Biases didn't arrive until 2017. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Weights and Biases has about 300 employees; Patsnap has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Weights and Biases and Patsnap competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Weights and Biases and Patsnap compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

It's close. Both Weights and Biases and Patsnap are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.

Who Should You Watch?

This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive