Weights and Biases vs Patsnap
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Two AI Data companies going head to head.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Weights and Biases
1 win
Patsnap
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$250M
300 employees
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
As AI Data players, Weights and Biases and Patsnap target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Weights and Biases at Acquired vs Patsnap at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
The AI Data sector features both Weights and Biases and Patsnap as key players. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.
Funding & Valuation
Valuations are in a similar range: Weights and Biases at $1.3B and Patsnap at $1B. Funding totals are closer: Patsnap at $300M compared to Weights and Biases's $250M.
Growth Stage
With a 10-year head start, Patsnap (founded 2007) has had considerably more time to mature than Weights and Biases (2017). Stage-wise, Weights and Biases is classified as Acquired and Patsnap as Series E, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. On headcount, Weights and Biases reports 300 employees and Patsnap reports 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇺🇸 United States and 🇸🇬 Singapore respectively, Weights and Biases and Patsnap tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, the gap is minimal — Weights and Biases scores 80 and Patsnap scores 80. Weights and Biases, led by Lukas Biewald, and Patsnap, led by Jeffrey Tiong, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
Weights and Biases
Patsnap
Funding History
Weights and Biases has completed 5 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. Weights and Biases's most recent round was a Series C of $50M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Weights and Biases has about 300 people and Patsnap has around 500-1000. Patsnap has a 10-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Weights and Biases operates out of United States and Patsnap from Singapore.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Weights and Biases | Patsnap |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1.3BWINS | $1B |
📈Total Funding | $250M | $300MWINS |
📅Founded | 2017WINS | 2007 |
🚀Stage | Acquired | Series E |
👥Employees | 300 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | United States | Singapore |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 80 | 80 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Weights and Biases is valued 1.3x higher ($1.3B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $50M more ($300M vs $250M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 10 years more (founded 2007 vs 2017)
Growth stage: Weights and Biases is at Acquired vs Patsnap at Series E
Team size: Weights and Biases has 300 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000
Market base: 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Weights and Biases if…
Top Pick- ✓More established by valuation ($1.3B)
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Choose Patsnap if…
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Funding History
Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.
Weights and Biases
Series C
Aug 2023
Lead: Daniel Gross
Series C
Sep 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Mar 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Apr 2019
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2018
Lead: Google Ventures
Patsnap
Series E
Sep 2021
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Weights and Biases
Unique to Patsnap
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Weights and Biases vs Patsnap
Is Weights and Biases bigger than Patsnap?▾
Which company raised more funding — Weights and Biases or Patsnap?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Weights and Biases vs Patsnap?▾
What does Weights and Biases do vs Patsnap?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Weights and Biases and Patsnap competitors?▾
Bottom Line
It's close. Both Weights and Biases and Patsnap are strong players, and picking a winner depends on what you're looking for. Check each profile for the full picture.
Who Should You Watch?
This one's genuinely too close to call. Both companies are competitive, and the winner will likely come down to execution over the next 12-18 months. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.