← Back to Models
⚖️

Gemma 2vsGemma 3

Google DeepMind vs Google DeepMind — Side-by-side model comparison

Gemma 3 leads 2/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricGemma 2Gemma 3
Provider
Arena Rank
#26
#19
Context Window
8K
128K
Input Pricing
Free/1M tokens
Free/1M tokens
Output Pricing
Free/1M tokens
Free/1M tokens
Parameters
27B
27B
Open Source
Yes
Yes
Best For
On-device AI, research, fine-tuning
Open source, on-device, research
Release Date
Jun 27, 2024
Mar 12, 2025

Gemma 2

Gemma 2 is Google's previous generation open-source model family, available in 2B, 9B, and 27B parameter sizes. Designed for researchers and developers, it provides strong performance for its size class on reasoning, coding, and general knowledge tasks. The model can be fine-tuned for specific domains and runs efficiently on consumer GPUs. Gemma 2 has been widely adopted in the research community for experiments in alignment, efficiency, and domain adaptation. Its permissive license allows commercial use.

View Google DeepMind profile →

Gemma 3

Gemma 3 is Google's latest open-source model built from Gemini research, available in multiple sizes from 1B to 27B parameters. It supports multimodal inputs (text and images) and over 140 languages, making it one of the most versatile open-source models available. Gemma 3 is designed to run efficiently on consumer hardware, from laptops to mobile devices, democratizing access to capable AI. The model achieves competitive performance with much larger models through efficient architecture design and training techniques derived from the Gemini program.

View Google DeepMind profile →

Key Differences: Gemma 2 vs Gemma 3

1

Gemma 3 ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#19) indicating stronger overall performance.

2

Gemma 3 supports a larger context window (128K), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.

3

Gemma 2 has 27B parameters vs Gemma 3's 27B, which affects inference speed and capability.

G

When to use Gemma 2

  • +Your use case involves on-device ai, research, fine-tuning
View full Gemma 2 specs →
G

When to use Gemma 3

  • +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
  • +You need to process long documents (128K context)
  • +Your use case involves open source, on-device, research
View full Gemma 3 specs →

Cost Analysis

Both models have similar pricing. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Gemma 2 monthly cost

$0

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

Gemma 3 monthly cost

$0

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Gemma 3 wins our head-to-head comparison with 2 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for open source, on-device, research, though Gemma 2 holds an edge in on-device ai, research, fine-tuning.

Last compared: March 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Gemma 2 or Gemma 3?
In our head-to-head comparison, Gemma 3 leads in 2 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Gemma 3 excels at open source, on-device, research, while Gemma 2 is better suited for on-device ai, research, fine-tuning. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Gemma 2 pricing compare to Gemma 3?
Gemma 2 charges Free per 1M input tokens and Free per 1M output tokens. Gemma 3 charges Free per 1M input tokens and Free per 1M output tokens. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Gemma 2 and Gemma 3?
Gemma 2 supports a 8K token context window, while Gemma 3 supports 128K tokens. Gemma 3 can process longer documents, codebases, and conversations in a single request. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Gemma 2 or Gemma 3 for free?
Gemma 2 is available for free (open-source). Gemma 3 is available for free (open-source). Open-source models can be self-hosted for free but require your own GPU infrastructure.
Which model has better benchmarks, Gemma 2 or Gemma 3?
Gemma 2 holds arena rank #26, while Gemma 3 holds rank #19. Gemma 3 performs better in overall arena benchmarks, which aggregate human preference ratings across coding, reasoning, and general tasks. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Gemma 2 or Gemma 3 better for coding?
Gemma 2's primary strength is on-device ai, research, fine-tuning. Gemma 3's primary strength is open source, on-device, research. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.