← Back to Models
⚖️

Claude Opus 4vsGPT-4.5

Anthropic vs OpenAI — Side-by-side model comparison

Claude Opus 4 leads 4/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4GPT-4.5
Provider
Arena Rank
#1
#4
Context Window
200K
128K
Input Pricing
$5.00/1M tokens
$75.00/1M tokens
Output Pricing
$25.00/1M tokens
$150.00/1M tokens
Parameters
Undisclosed
Undisclosed
Open Source
No
No
Best For
Complex reasoning, coding, agentic tasks
Creative writing, nuanced understanding, EQ tasks
Release Date
May 22, 2025
Feb 27, 2025

Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most powerful AI model, holding the #1 position on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard. It represents a breakthrough in extended thinking and agentic capabilities, able to work autonomously on complex multi-step tasks for hours. With a 200K token context window, it excels at analyzing entire codebases, lengthy legal documents, and research papers in a single pass. The model demonstrates exceptional performance in coding (setting new benchmarks on SWE-bench), advanced reasoning, and nuanced writing tasks. Its agentic capabilities allow it to use tools, navigate computers, and execute multi-step workflows with minimal human oversight. Opus 4 is the preferred choice for enterprises requiring the highest quality output on mission-critical tasks where accuracy and depth matter more than speed or cost.

View Anthropic profile →

GPT-4.5

GPT-4.5 is OpenAI's largest and most knowledge-rich model, designed to excel at creative, nuanced, and emotionally intelligent tasks. Unlike the reasoning-focused o-series models, GPT-4.5 was trained with a massive amount of data to develop deep world knowledge and conversational sophistication. It produces more natural, human-like responses and demonstrates improved understanding of context, tone, and subtext. The model is particularly strong at creative writing, brainstorming, open-ended exploration, and tasks requiring emotional intelligence. However, its premium pricing ($75/1M input tokens) makes it the most expensive OpenAI model, positioning it for use cases where the highest quality creative output justifies the cost. It represents OpenAI's investment in making AI more relatable and conversationally capable.

View OpenAI profile →

Key Differences: Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4.5

1

Claude Opus 4 ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#1) indicating stronger overall performance.

2

Claude Opus 4 is 7.5x cheaper on average, making it the better choice for high-volume applications.

3

Claude Opus 4 supports a larger context window (200K), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.

C

When to use Claude Opus 4

  • +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
  • +Budget is a concern and you need cost efficiency
  • +You need to process long documents (200K context)
  • +Your use case involves complex reasoning, coding, agentic tasks
View full Claude Opus 4 specs →
G

When to use GPT-4.5

  • +Quality matters more than cost
  • +Your use case involves creative writing, nuanced understanding, eq tasks
View full GPT-4.5 specs →

Cost Analysis

At current pricing, Claude Opus 4 is 7.5x more affordable than GPT-4.5. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Claude Opus 4 monthly cost

$1,500

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

GPT-4.5 monthly cost

$11,250

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Claude Opus 4 wins our head-to-head comparison with 4 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for complex reasoning, coding, agentic tasks, though GPT-4.5 holds an edge in creative writing, nuanced understanding, eq tasks.

Last compared: March 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-4.5?
In our head-to-head comparison, Claude Opus 4 leads in 4 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Claude Opus 4 excels at complex reasoning, coding, agentic tasks, while GPT-4.5 is better suited for creative writing, nuanced understanding, eq tasks. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Claude Opus 4 pricing compare to GPT-4.5?
Claude Opus 4 charges $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-4.5 charges $75.00 per 1M input tokens and $150.00 per 1M output tokens. Claude Opus 4 is the more affordable option, approximately 7.5x cheaper on average. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4.5?
Claude Opus 4 supports a 200K token context window, while GPT-4.5 supports 128K tokens. Claude Opus 4 can process longer documents, codebases, and conversations in a single request. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Claude Opus 4 or GPT-4.5 for free?
Claude Opus 4 is a paid API model starting at $5.00 per 1M input tokens. GPT-4.5 is a paid API model starting at $75.00 per 1M input tokens.
Which model has better benchmarks, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-4.5?
Claude Opus 4 holds arena rank #1, while GPT-4.5 holds rank #4. Claude Opus 4 performs better in overall arena benchmarks, which aggregate human preference ratings across coding, reasoning, and general tasks. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Claude Opus 4 or GPT-4.5 better for coding?
Claude Opus 4 is specifically optimized for coding tasks. GPT-4.5's primary strength is creative writing, nuanced understanding, eq tasks. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.