01.AI vs Anthropic
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Anthropic is valued at $380B — more than 3x 01.AI's $1B.
Head-to-Head Verdict
01.AI
0 wins
Anthropic
5 wins
Key Numbers
🇨🇳 China · Kai-Fu Lee
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
150 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Dario Amodei
Valuation
$380B
Total Funding
$67B
3,000 employees
Both companies compete in the Foundation Models space, though from different geographies — 01.AI in China and Anthropic in United States. Different stages (Series D vs Series G) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
01.AI and Anthropic are direct competitors in Foundation Models. 01. Anthropic is an AI safety company founded in 2021 that develops large language models and AI systems.
Funding & Valuation
The valuation disparity is stark: Anthropic at $380B versus 01.AI at $1B, a 380x difference. On the funding front, Anthropic has secured $67B, outpacing 01.AI's $300M by $66.7B.
Growth Stage
The founding gap is narrow: Anthropic in 2021 versus 01.AI in 2023. Stage-wise, 01.AI is classified as Series D and Anthropic as Series G, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Team sizes also differ: 01.AI employs 150 people versus Anthropic's 3,000.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: 01.AI in 🇨🇳 China and Anthropic in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Anthropic scores 95 on Awaira's composite index versus 01.AI's 64, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Kai-Fu Lee and Dario Amodei respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
01.AI
Anthropic
Funding History
01.AI has completed 4 funding rounds, while Anthropic has gone through 8. 01.AI's most recent round was a Series D of $80M, compared to Anthropic's Series G ($30B). 01.AI is at Series D while Anthropic is at Series G — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Anthropic has the bigger team at roughly 3,000 people — 20x the size of 01.AI's 150. They're close in age — 01.AI started in 2023 and Anthropic in 2021. Geographically, they're in different markets — 01.AI operates out of China and Anthropic from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | 01.AI | Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1B | $380BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $300M | $67BWINS |
📅Founded | 2023WINS | 2021 |
🚀Stage | Series D | Series G |
👥Employees | 150 | 3,000 |
🌍Country | China | United States |
🏷️Category | Foundation Models | Foundation Models |
⭐Awaira Score | 64 | 95WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Anthropic is valued 380x higher ($380B vs $1B)
Funding gap: Anthropic has raised $66.7B more ($67B vs $300M)
Market experience: Anthropic has 2 years more (founded 2021 vs 2023)
Growth stage: 01.AI is at Series D vs Anthropic at Series G
Team size: 01.AI has 150 employees vs Anthropic's 3,000
Market base: 🇨🇳 01.AI (China) vs 🇺🇸 Anthropic (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Foundation Models market segment
Awaira Score: Anthropic scores 95/100 vs 01.AI's 64/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose 01.AI if…
- ✓China-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓01
Choose Anthropic if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 95/100 vs 64/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($380B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $67B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2021
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Anthropic is an AI safety company founded in 2021 that develops large language models and AI systems
Funding History
01.AI raised $300M across 4 rounds. Anthropic raised $67B across 8 rounds.
01.AI
Series D
Sep 2024
Lead: Sequoia Capital China
Series C
Jun 2024
Series B
Jan 2024
Lead: Sequoia Capital China
Series A
Sep 2023
Lead: Sequoia Capital China
Anthropic
Series G
Feb 2026
Lead: GIC
Series F
Aug 2025
Lead: ICONIQ
Series E
Mar 2025
Lead: Lightspeed Venture Partners
Series D
Oct 2023
Lead: Google
Corporate
Sep 2023
Lead: Amazon
Series C
Mar 2023
Lead: Google
Series B
Apr 2022
Lead: Google
Series A
May 2021
Lead: Google
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to 01.AI
Unique to Anthropic
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — 01.AI vs Anthropic
Is 01.AI bigger than Anthropic?▾
Which company raised more funding — 01.AI or Anthropic?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded 01.AI vs Anthropic?▾
What does 01.AI do vs Anthropic?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are 01.AI and Anthropic competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Anthropic has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 95 vs 01.AI's 64. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Anthropic is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But 01.AI has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.