ABEJA vs Celonis
In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
🇯🇵 Japan · Shoichiro Aoyama
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$50M
100-500 employees
🇩🇪 Germany · Alexander Rinke
Valuation
$13B
Total Funding
$1.4B
1000+ employees
Analyst Summary
Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations
Both ABEJA and Celonis compete directly in the Enterprise AI space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines. Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow.
Celonis carries a known valuation of $13B, while ABEJA's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Celonis has raised $1.4B in total — $1.4B more than ABEJA's $50M.
Celonis has 1 year more market experience, having been founded in 2011 compared to ABEJA's 2012 founding. In terms of growth stage, ABEJA is at Series C while Celonis is at Series D — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.
ABEJA operates out of 🇯🇵 Japan while Celonis is based in 🇩🇪 Germany, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Celonis leads with a score of 90, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ABEJA | Celonis |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $13B |
📈Total Funding | $50M | $1.4BWINS |
📅Founded | 2012WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Series C | Series D |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1000+ |
🌍Country | Japan | Germany |
🏷️Category | Enterprise AI | Enterprise AI |
⭐Awaira Score | 55 | 90WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Celonis has raised $1.4B more ($1.4B vs $50M)
Market experience: Celonis has 1 year more (founded 2011 vs 2012)
Growth stage: ABEJA is at Series C vs Celonis at Series D
Team size: ABEJA has 100-500 employees vs Celonis's 1000+
Market base: 🇯🇵 ABEJA (Japan) vs 🇩🇪 Celonis (Germany)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment
Awaira Score: Celonis scores 90/100 vs ABEJA's 55/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose ABEJA if…
- ✓Japan-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines
Choose Celonis if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 90/100 vs 55/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($13B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $1.4B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Germany-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow