ABEJA vs Grammarly
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Grammarly is valued at $13B — more than 3x ABEJA's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
ABEJA
0 wins
Grammarly
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇯🇵 Japan · Shoichiro Aoyama
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$50M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Alex Shevchenko
Valuation
$13B
Total Funding
$545M
2500 employees
Both companies compete in the Enterprise AI space, though from different geographies — ABEJA in Japan and Grammarly in United States. Different stages (Series C vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
ABEJA and Grammarly are direct competitors in Enterprise AI. ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines. Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels.
Funding & Valuation
Only Grammarly has a public valuation on record ($13B); ABEJA's has not been disclosed. Grammarly has amassed $545M in total funding, far exceeding ABEJA's $50M.
Growth Stage
The founding gap is narrow: Grammarly in 2009 versus ABEJA in 2012. Growth stages differ: ABEJA (Series C) versus Grammarly (Private), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, ABEJA reports 100-500 employees and Grammarly reports 2500.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇯🇵 Japan and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, ABEJA and Grammarly tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. Grammarly scores 88 on Awaira's composite index versus ABEJA's 55, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Shoichiro Aoyama and Alex Shevchenko respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
ABEJA
Grammarly
Funding History
ABEJA has completed 4 funding rounds, while Grammarly has gone through 3. ABEJA's most recent round was a Series C of $27.5M, compared to Grammarly's Series E ($200M). ABEJA is at Series C while Grammarly is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Grammarly has the bigger team at roughly 2500 people — 25x the size of ABEJA's 100-500. Grammarly has a 3-year head start, founded in 2009 vs ABEJA's 2012. Geographically, they're in different markets — ABEJA operates out of Japan and Grammarly from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ABEJA | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $13B |
📈Total Funding | $50M | $545MWINS |
📅Founded | 2012WINS | 2009 |
🚀Stage | Series C | Private |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 2500 |
🌍Country | Japan | United States |
🏷️Category | Enterprise AI | Enterprise AI |
⭐Awaira Score | 55 | 88WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Grammarly has raised $495M more ($545M vs $50M)
Market experience: Grammarly has 3 years more (founded 2009 vs 2012)
Growth stage: ABEJA is at Series C vs Grammarly at Private
Team size: ABEJA has 100-500 employees vs Grammarly's 2500
Market base: 🇯🇵 ABEJA (Japan) vs 🇺🇸 Grammarly (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment
Awaira Score: Grammarly scores 88/100 vs ABEJA's 55/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose ABEJA if…
- ✓Japan-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines
Choose Grammarly if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 88/100 vs 55/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($13B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $545M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2009
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels
Funding History
ABEJA raised $50M across 4 rounds. Grammarly raised $545M across 3 rounds.
ABEJA
Series C
Jun 2016
Series B
Feb 2015
Series A
Oct 2013
Seed
Jun 2012
Grammarly
Series E
Jul 2021
Series D
Oct 2019
Lead: Dragoneer Growth Investments
Series C
Jan 2017
Lead: General Catalyst
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Grammarly
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — ABEJA vs Grammarly
Is ABEJA bigger than Grammarly?▾
Which company raised more funding — ABEJA or Grammarly?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded ABEJA vs Grammarly?▾
What does ABEJA do vs Grammarly?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are ABEJA and Grammarly competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Grammarly has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 88 vs ABEJA's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Grammarly is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But ABEJA has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.