Skip to main content

ABEJA vs Grammarly

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Grammarly is valued at $13B — more than 3x ABEJA's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Grammarly leads on 4 of 4 metrics

ABEJA

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Grammarly

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$13B
Total Funding
$50M
$545M
Awaira Score
55/100
88/100
Employees
100-500
2500
Founded
2012
2009
Stage
Series C
Private
ABEJAGrammarly
ABEJA logo
ABEJA

🇯🇵 Japan · Shoichiro Aoyama

Series CEnterprise AIEst. 2012

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$50M

Awaira Score55/100

100-500 employees

Full ABEJA Profile →
Winner
Grammarly logo
Grammarly

🇺🇸 United States · Alex Shevchenko

PrivateEnterprise AIEst. 2009

Valuation

$13B

Total Funding

$545M

Awaira Score88/100

2500 employees

Full Grammarly Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the Enterprise AI space, though from different geographies — ABEJA in Japan and Grammarly in United States. Different stages (Series C vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

ABEJA and Grammarly are direct competitors in Enterprise AI. ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines. Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels.

Funding & Valuation

Only Grammarly has a public valuation on record ($13B); ABEJA's has not been disclosed. Grammarly has amassed $545M in total funding, far exceeding ABEJA's $50M.

Growth Stage

The founding gap is narrow: Grammarly in 2009 versus ABEJA in 2012. Growth stages differ: ABEJA (Series C) versus Grammarly (Private), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, ABEJA reports 100-500 employees and Grammarly reports 2500.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇯🇵 Japan and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, ABEJA and Grammarly tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. Grammarly scores 88 on Awaira's composite index versus ABEJA's 55, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Shoichiro Aoyama and Alex Shevchenko respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

ABEJA

Total Rounds4
Avg. Round Size$12.5M
Funding Span4 yrs

Grammarly

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$170M
Funding Span4.5 yrs

Funding History

ABEJA has completed 4 funding rounds, while Grammarly has gone through 3. ABEJA's most recent round was a Series C of $27.5M, compared to Grammarly's Series E ($200M). ABEJA is at Series C while Grammarly is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Grammarly has the bigger team at roughly 2500 people — 25x the size of ABEJA's 100-500. Grammarly has a 3-year head start, founded in 2009 vs ABEJA's 2012. Geographically, they're in different markets — ABEJA operates out of Japan and Grammarly from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricABEJAGrammarly
💰Valuation
N/A
$13B
📈Total Funding
$50M
$545MWINS
📅Founded
2012WINS
2009
🚀Stage
Series C
Private
👥Employees
100-500
2500
🌍Country
Japan
United States
🏷️Category
Enterprise AI
Enterprise AI
Awaira Score
55
88WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Grammarly has raised $495M more ($545M vs $50M)

📅

Market experience: Grammarly has 3 years more (founded 2009 vs 2012)

🚀

Growth stage: ABEJA is at Series C vs Grammarly at Private

👥

Team size: ABEJA has 100-500 employees vs Grammarly's 2500

🌍

Market base: 🇯🇵 ABEJA (Japan) vs 🇺🇸 Grammarly (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment

Awaira Score: Grammarly scores 88/100 vs ABEJA's 55/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

ABEJA logo

Choose ABEJA if…

  • Japan-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines
Grammarly logo

Choose Grammarly if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 88/100 vs 55/100
  • More established by valuation ($13B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $545M
  • More market experience — founded in 2009
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels

Funding History

ABEJA raised $50M across 4 rounds. Grammarly raised $545M across 3 rounds.

ABEJA

Series C

Jun 2016

$27.5M

Series B

Feb 2015

$14M

Series A

Oct 2013

$6M

Seed

Jun 2012

$2.5M

Grammarly

Series E

Jul 2021

$200M

Series D

Oct 2019

Lead: Dragoneer Growth Investments

$200M

Series C

Jan 2017

Lead: General Catalyst

$110M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Grammarly

General CatalystSequoia CapitalSaudi PIFDragoneer Growth InvestmentsIVP

Users Also Compare

FAQ — ABEJA vs Grammarly

Is ABEJA bigger than Grammarly?
Grammarly has a disclosed valuation of $13B, while ABEJA's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Grammarly employs 2500 people.
Which company raised more funding — ABEJA or Grammarly?
Grammarly has raised more in total funding at $545M, compared to ABEJA's $50M — a gap of $495M. Combined, the two companies have completed 7 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Grammarly leads with an Awaira Score of 88/100, while ABEJA sits at 55/100. That 33-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded ABEJA vs Grammarly?
ABEJA was founded by Shoichiro Aoyama in 2012. Grammarly was founded by Alex Shevchenko in 2009. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does ABEJA do vs Grammarly?
ABEJA: ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines. The Tokyo company has built an enterprise software business serving Japanese retailers and manufacturers seeking to apply AI to operational problems without building internal AI engineering teams.\n\nThe company raised approximately $50 million in venture funding from investors including SBI Investment, SMBC Venture Capital, and KDDI Open Advancement Fund. ABEJA serves major Japanese retailers, convenience store chains, and manufacturing companies with AI analytics that derive insights from existing camera infrastructure in stores and factories. The company ABEJA Platform cloud product allows enterprise clients to build, deploy, and manage computer vision AI applications with managed infrastructure that reduces the AI operations burden.\n\nABEJA competes in the Japanese enterprise AI market alongside Retail AI (a Seven-Eleven Japan subsidiary) and international computer vision vendors. Japan large retail and manufacturing sectors, combined with limited English-language AI vendor support and preference for domestic supplier relationships in enterprise procurement, create a favourable environment for domestic AI platform companies with established enterprise relationships. The company participation in Japan government digital transformation initiatives has provided additional channels for deploying AI in public sector and infrastructure applications. Grammarly: Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels. The company offers both consumer and enterprise products, including browser extensions, desktop applications, and web-based editors that integrate with email clients, messaging platforms, and document editors like Google Docs and Microsoft Office. The platform uses machine learning and natural language processing to analyze writing for clarity, engagement, and delivery. Beyond basic grammar, Grammarly detects tone issues, provides vocabulary suggestions, and offers plagiarism detection in premium tiers. The enterprise version, Grammarly Business, targets organizations seeking to standardize communication quality across teams. As of recent valuations, Grammarly reached a $13.0 billion valuation with $545 million in total funding, positioning it as one of the most heavily funded AI writing tools. The company competes with tools like Microsoft Editor and emerging AI writing assistants powered by large language models. Grammarly serves millions of users globally, including students, professionals, and corporate teams. The platform's growth has accelerated with increasing demand for workplace writing tools and AI-assisted productivity software. The company remains privately held. Its competitive advantage lies in its large user base generating training data and its focused specialization in writing assistance. Grammarly's $13B valuation reflects the substantial market demand for AI-powered writing assistance tools integrated into everyday digital workflows.
Which company was founded first?
Grammarly got there first, launching in 2009 — that's 3 years of extra runway. ABEJA didn't arrive until 2012. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
ABEJA has about 100-500 employees; Grammarly has about 2500. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are ABEJA and Grammarly competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both ABEJA and Grammarly compete in Enterprise AI, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Grammarly has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 88 vs ABEJA's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Grammarly is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But ABEJA has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive