Overall Winner: Grammarly·88/ 100
VS
G
GrammarlyWinner

ABEJA vs Grammarly

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

A
ABEJA

🇯🇵 Japan · Shoichiro Aoyama

Series CEnterprise AIEst. 2012

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$50M

55
Awaira Score55/100

100-500 employees

Full ABEJA Profile →
Winner
G
Grammarly

🇺🇸 United States · Alex Shevchenko

PrivateEnterprise AIEst. 2009

Valuation

$13B

Total Funding

$545M

88
Awaira Score88/100

2500 employees

Full Grammarly Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both ABEJA and Grammarly compete directly in the Enterprise AI space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines. Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels.

Grammarly carries a known valuation of $13B, while ABEJA's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Grammarly has raised $545M in total — $495M more than ABEJA's $50M.

Grammarly has 3 years more market experience, having been founded in 2009 compared to ABEJA's 2012 founding. In terms of growth stage, ABEJA is at Series C while Grammarly is at Private — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

ABEJA operates out of 🇯🇵 Japan while Grammarly is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Grammarly leads with a score of 88, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricABEJAGrammarly
💰Valuation
N/A
$13B
📈Total Funding
$50M
$545MWINS
📅Founded
2012WINS
2009
🚀Stage
Series C
Private
👥Employees
100-500
2500
🌍Country
Japan
United States
🏷️Category
Enterprise AI
Enterprise AI
Awaira Score
55
88WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Grammarly has raised $495M more ($545M vs $50M)

📅

Market experience: Grammarly has 3 years more (founded 2009 vs 2012)

🚀

Growth stage: ABEJA is at Series C vs Grammarly at Private

👥

Team size: ABEJA has 100-500 employees vs Grammarly's 2500

🌍

Market base: 🇯🇵 ABEJA (Japan) vs 🇺🇸 Grammarly (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment

Awaira Score: Grammarly scores 88/100 vs ABEJA's 55/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

A

Choose ABEJA if…

  • Japan-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines
G

Choose Grammarly if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 88/100 vs 55/100
  • More established by valuation ($13B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $545M
  • More market experience — founded in 2009
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels

Funding History

ABEJA raised $50M across 0 rounds. Grammarly raised $545M across 6 rounds.

ABEJA

No public funding data available.

Grammarly

Series E

Jul 2021

$200M

Series D

Oct 2019

Lead: Dragoneer Growth Investments

$200M

Series C

Jan 2017

Lead: General Catalyst Partners

$110M

Series B

Jan 2014

Lead: General Catalyst Partners

$20M

Series A

Jan 2012

$3M

Seed

Jan 2009

$1.1M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Grammarly

General Catalyst PartnersSequoia CapitalSaudi PIFDragoneer Growth InvestmentsIVPColler International

Users Also Compare

FAQ — ABEJA vs Grammarly

Is ABEJA bigger than Grammarly?
Grammarly has a disclosed valuation of $13B, while ABEJA's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Grammarly employs 2500 people.
Which company raised more funding — ABEJA or Grammarly?
Grammarly has raised more in total funding at $545M, compared to ABEJA's $50M — a gap of $495M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Grammarly holds the higher Awaira Score at 88/100, compared to ABEJA's 55/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 33-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded ABEJA vs Grammarly?
ABEJA was founded by Shoichiro Aoyama in 2012. Grammarly was founded by Alex Shevchenko in 2009. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does ABEJA do vs Grammarly?
ABEJA: ABEJA develops AI platform products for retail operations and manufacturing quality control, applying computer vision to analyse in-store customer behaviour and product performance in retail environments, and deploying visual inspection AI for defect detection in manufacturing production lines. The Tokyo company has built an enterprise software business serving Japanese retailers and manufacturers seeking to apply AI to operational problems without building internal AI engineering teams.\n\nThe company raised approximately $50 million in venture funding from investors including SBI Investment, SMBC Venture Capital, and KDDI Open Innovation Fund. ABEJA serves major Japanese retailers, convenience store chains, and manufacturing companies with AI analytics that derive insights from existing camera infrastructure in stores and factories. The company ABEJA Platform cloud product allows enterprise clients to build, deploy, and manage computer vision AI applications with managed infrastructure that reduces the AI operations burden.\n\nABEJA competes in the Japanese enterprise AI market alongside Retail AI (a Seven-Eleven Japan subsidiary) and international computer vision vendors. Japan large retail and manufacturing sectors, combined with limited English-language AI vendor support and preference for domestic supplier relationships in enterprise procurement, create a favourable environment for domestic AI platform companies with established enterprise relationships. The company participation in Japan government digital transformation initiatives has provided additional channels for deploying AI in public sector and infrastructure applications. Grammarly: Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels. The company offers both consumer and enterprise products, including browser extensions, desktop applications, and web-based editors that integrate with email clients, messaging platforms, and document editors like Google Docs and Microsoft Office. The platform uses machine learning and natural language processing to analyze writing for clarity, engagement, and delivery. Beyond basic grammar, Grammarly detects tone issues, provides vocabulary suggestions, and offers plagiarism detection in premium tiers. The enterprise version, Grammarly Business, targets organizations seeking to standardize communication quality across teams. As of recent valuations, Grammarly reached a $13.0 billion valuation with $545 million in total funding, positioning it as one of the most heavily funded AI writing tools. The company competes with tools like Microsoft Editor and emerging AI writing assistants powered by large language models. Grammarly serves millions of users globally, including students, professionals, and corporate teams. The platform's growth has accelerated with increasing demand for workplace writing tools and AI-assisted productivity software. The company remains privately held, having declined a reported acquisition offer from Microsoft in 2021. Its competitive advantage lies in its large user base generating training data and its focused specialization in writing assistance. Grammarly's $13B valuation reflects the substantial market demand for AI-powered writing assistance tools integrated into everyday digital workflows.
Which company was founded first?
Grammarly was founded first in 2009, giving it 3 years of additional market experience. ABEJA was founded later in 2012. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
ABEJA has approximately 100-500 employees, while Grammarly has approximately 2500. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are ABEJA and Grammarly competitors?
Yes, ABEJA and Grammarly are direct competitors — both operate in the Enterprise AI space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.