Adept vs Kore.ai

By valuation, Kore.ai is the larger company at $1B versus $1B — a 1x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Adept employs 200 people while Kore.ai has 1000+ employees.

Adept has raised more in total funding at $415M, compared to Kore.ai's $250M — a gap of $165M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.

Kore.ai holds the higher Awaira Score at 90/100, compared to Adept's 76/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 14-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.

Adept was founded by David Luan in 2022. Kore.ai was founded by Raj Koneru in 2014. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.

Adept: Adept is an AI company founded in 2022 that develops AI agents capable of performing complex tasks across digital environments. The company specializes in creating AI systems that can interact with software applications, browsers, and APIs to automate workflows and assist with knowledge work. Adept's core technology focuses on large language models combined with reinforcement learning to enable agents that learn from user interactions and improve over time. The company raised $415 million in total funding and achieved a $1 billion valuation, securing investment from prominent venture capital firms including Khosla Ventures and others. Adept's approach targets enterprise automation, aiming to create agents that can handle tasks like data entry, research, customer support, and business process automation. The company positioned itself in the competitive AI agents landscape alongside other startups and established tech companies building autonomous systems. Adept was subsequently acquired, marking a significant exit in the AI sector. The acquisition reflected growing enterprise demand for AI automation tools and validated the market opportunity for agent-based systems. The company's focus on practical automation applications rather than consumer-facing AI differentiated its positioning. Adept's trajectory from founding through acquisition occurred during rapid expansion in generative AI investment and adoption across industries. Adept pioneered enterprise-focused AI agents designed to autonomously execute complex digital workflows through direct software interaction. Kore.ai: Kore.ai is an enterprise conversational AI platform that enables organizations to build, deploy, and manage intelligent virtual assistants across customer service, employee experience, and business process automation use cases. The platform offers a no-code builder, pre-built industry templates, and a proprietary natural language processing engine that supports more than 100 languages and dialects.\n\nThe company has raised approximately $250M across multiple funding rounds and serves over 200 Fortune 500 customers including major banks, telecom operators, healthcare systems, and retailers globally. Kore.ai processes billions of interactions annually and has expanded its product suite to include an AI agent management layer for orchestrating multi-agent workflows.\n\nWith a unicorn-level valuation and deep enterprise penetration, Kore.ai is one of the most commercially mature conversational AI platforms globally. The company competes directly with ServiceNow, Salesforce Einstein, and Microsoft Copilot in the enterprise AI assistant market, with a differentiated strength in omnichannel deployment and regulated industry compliance.

Kore.ai was founded first in 2014, giving it 8 years of additional market experience. Adept was founded later in 2022. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.

Adept has approximately 200 employees, while Kore.ai has approximately 1000+. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.

Yes, Adept and Kore.ai are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Agents space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.