Skip to main content

AgNext Technologies vs Patsnap

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Patsnap is valued at $1B — more than 3x AgNext Technologies's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Patsnap leads on 4 of 4 metrics

AgNext Technologies

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Patsnap

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$1B
Total Funding
$10M
$300M
Awaira Score
55/100
80/100
Employees
50-200
500-1000
Founded
2016
2007
Stage
Series B
Series E
AgNext TechnologiesPatsnap
AgNext Technologies logo
AgNext Technologies

🇮🇳 India · Taranjeet Singh Bhamra

Series BAI DataEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$10M

Awaira Score55/100

50-200 employees

Full AgNext Technologies Profile →
Winner
Patsnap logo
Patsnap

🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong

Series EAI DataEst. 2007

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$300M

Awaira Score80/100

500-1000 employees

Full Patsnap Profile →
Market Context

As AI Data players, AgNext Technologies and Patsnap target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — AgNext Technologies at Series B vs Patsnap at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

AgNext Technologies and Patsnap both operate in AI Data, though their strategies diverge significantly. AgNext Technologies develops AI-powered quality assessment solutions for the agriculture and food supply chain industry, using near-infrared spectroscopy, computer vision, and machine learning to deliver rapid, non-destructive grading of grains, oilseeds, spices, and other agricultural commodities at procurement centers, ports, and processing facilities. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.

Funding & Valuation

Patsnap carries a disclosed valuation of $1B, while AgNext Technologies remains privately valued. Capital raised tells a clear story: Patsnap at $300M versus AgNext Technologies at $10M — a $290M difference.

Growth Stage

Patsnap (est. 2007) predates AgNext Technologies (est. 2016) by 9 years, a significant head start in building market presence. AgNext Technologies is at Series B while Patsnap stands at Series E, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: AgNext Technologies has 50-200 employees and Patsnap has 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: AgNext Technologies in 🇮🇳 India and Patsnap in 🇸🇬 Singapore, each benefiting from local ecosystems. A 25-point gap on the Awaira Score (Patsnap: 80, AgNext Technologies: 55) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. AgNext Technologies, led by Taranjeet Singh Bhamra, and Patsnap, led by Jeffrey Tiong, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

AgNext Technologies

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$3.3M
Funding Span2.7 yrs

Patsnap

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Funding History

AgNext Technologies has completed 3 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. AgNext Technologies's most recent round was a Series B of $7M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). AgNext Technologies is at Series B while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Patsnap has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 10x the size of AgNext Technologies's 50-200. Patsnap has a 9-year head start, founded in 2007 vs AgNext Technologies's 2016. Geographically, they're in different markets — AgNext Technologies operates out of India and Patsnap from Singapore.

Metrics Comparison

MetricAgNext TechnologiesPatsnap
💰Valuation
N/A
$1B
📈Total Funding
$10M
$300MWINS
📅Founded
2016WINS
2007
🚀Stage
Series B
Series E
👥Employees
50-200
500-1000
🌍Country
India
Singapore
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
55
80WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $290M more ($300M vs $10M)

📅

Market experience: Patsnap has 9 years more (founded 2007 vs 2016)

🚀

Growth stage: AgNext Technologies is at Series B vs Patsnap at Series E

👥

Team size: AgNext Technologies has 50-200 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇳 AgNext Technologies (India) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Patsnap scores 80/100 vs AgNext Technologies's 55/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

AgNext Technologies logo

Choose AgNext Technologies if…

  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • AgNext Technologies develops AI-powered quality assessment solutions for the agriculture and food supply chain industry, using near-infrared spectroscopy, computer vision, and machine learning to deliver rapid, non-destructive grading of grains, oilseeds, spices, and other agricultural commodities at procurement centers, ports, and processing facilities
Patsnap logo

Choose Patsnap if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 55/100
  • More established by valuation ($1B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
  • More market experience — founded in 2007
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents

Funding History

AgNext Technologies raised $10M across 3 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.

AgNext Technologies

Series B

Feb 2019

$7M

Series A

Oct 2017

$2.2M

Seed

Jun 2016

$800K

Patsnap

Series E

Sep 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Patsnap

SoftBank Vision Fund 2TencentSequoia Capital China

Users Also Compare

FAQ — AgNext Technologies vs Patsnap

Is AgNext Technologies bigger than Patsnap?
Patsnap has a disclosed valuation of $1B, while AgNext Technologies's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Patsnap employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — AgNext Technologies or Patsnap?
Patsnap has raised more in total funding at $300M, compared to AgNext Technologies's $10M — a gap of $290M. Combined, the two companies have completed 4 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Patsnap leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while AgNext Technologies sits at 55/100. That 25-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded AgNext Technologies vs Patsnap?
AgNext Technologies was founded by Taranjeet Singh Bhamra in 2016. Patsnap was founded by Jeffrey Tiong in 2007. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does AgNext Technologies do vs Patsnap?
AgNext Technologies: AgNext Technologies develops AI-powered quality assessment solutions for the agriculture and food supply chain industry, using near-infrared spectroscopy, computer vision, and machine learning to deliver rapid, non-destructive grading of grains, oilseeds, spices, and other agricultural commodities at procurement centers, ports, and processing facilities. The platform enables buyers and processors to standardize quality assessment and reduce adulteration across complex supply chains.\n\nThe company raised approximately $10M in Series B funding and has deployed its AgriSpec and QualEx products at government procurement agencies, commodity exchanges, large agri-processors, and export-oriented food companies across India and internationally. AgNext's devices replace subjective manual inspection with objective, data-driven quality measurements.\n\nFood quality and adulteration are persistent problems in India's agricultural supply chain, with significant economic and public health consequences. AgNext's technology addresses a regulatory and commercial imperative, and its deployments at government procurement operations provide both revenue stability and strong validation of the technology's accuracy in field conditions. Patsnap: Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. The Singapore company integrates patent data with scientific literature and chemical structure databases to provide a comprehensive IP and technology intelligence environment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $300 million including a Series E round from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Tencent, and CPE Yunji, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. Patsnap serves over 10,000 companies globally including R&D-intensive organisations in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and consumer electronics that use patent landscape analysis to inform technology strategy and investment decisions.\n\nPatsnap competes in the IP analytics market against Derwent Advancement (Clarivate), Questel Orbit, and Minesoft, as well as general enterprise search platforms that include patent data. Its AI capabilities for patent claim analysis, technology trend extraction, and cross-domain IP search differentiate it from traditional Boolean-search patent databases, enabling R&D strategy questions to be answered through AI-assisted analysis rather than manual patent review. The Singapore base provides access to both the Southeast Asian technology market and a sophisticated legal and financial services market for IP monetisation and licensing analytics.
Which company was founded first?
Patsnap got there first, launching in 2007 — that's 9 years of extra runway. AgNext Technologies didn't arrive until 2016. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
AgNext Technologies has about 50-200 employees; Patsnap has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are AgNext Technologies and Patsnap competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both AgNext Technologies and Patsnap compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Patsnap has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs AgNext Technologies's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Patsnap is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But AgNext Technologies has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive