AgNext Technologies vs Patsnap
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Patsnap is valued at $1B — more than 3x AgNext Technologies's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
AgNext Technologies
0 wins
Patsnap
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇳 India · Taranjeet Singh Bhamra
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$10M
50-200 employees
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
As AI Data players, AgNext Technologies and Patsnap target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — AgNext Technologies at Series B vs Patsnap at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
AgNext Technologies and Patsnap both operate in AI Data, though their strategies diverge significantly. AgNext Technologies develops AI-powered quality assessment solutions for the agriculture and food supply chain industry, using near-infrared spectroscopy, computer vision, and machine learning to deliver rapid, non-destructive grading of grains, oilseeds, spices, and other agricultural commodities at procurement centers, ports, and processing facilities. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.
Funding & Valuation
Patsnap carries a disclosed valuation of $1B, while AgNext Technologies remains privately valued. Capital raised tells a clear story: Patsnap at $300M versus AgNext Technologies at $10M — a $290M difference.
Growth Stage
Patsnap (est. 2007) predates AgNext Technologies (est. 2016) by 9 years, a significant head start in building market presence. AgNext Technologies is at Series B while Patsnap stands at Series E, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: AgNext Technologies has 50-200 employees and Patsnap has 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: AgNext Technologies in 🇮🇳 India and Patsnap in 🇸🇬 Singapore, each benefiting from local ecosystems. A 25-point gap on the Awaira Score (Patsnap: 80, AgNext Technologies: 55) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. AgNext Technologies, led by Taranjeet Singh Bhamra, and Patsnap, led by Jeffrey Tiong, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
AgNext Technologies
Patsnap
Funding History
AgNext Technologies has completed 3 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. AgNext Technologies's most recent round was a Series B of $7M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). AgNext Technologies is at Series B while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Patsnap has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 10x the size of AgNext Technologies's 50-200. Patsnap has a 9-year head start, founded in 2007 vs AgNext Technologies's 2016. Geographically, they're in different markets — AgNext Technologies operates out of India and Patsnap from Singapore.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | AgNext Technologies | Patsnap |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1B |
📈Total Funding | $10M | $300MWINS |
📅Founded | 2016WINS | 2007 |
🚀Stage | Series B | Series E |
👥Employees | 50-200 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | India | Singapore |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 55 | 80WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $290M more ($300M vs $10M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 9 years more (founded 2007 vs 2016)
Growth stage: AgNext Technologies is at Series B vs Patsnap at Series E
Team size: AgNext Technologies has 50-200 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000
Market base: 🇮🇳 AgNext Technologies (India) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Patsnap scores 80/100 vs AgNext Technologies's 55/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose AgNext Technologies if…
- ✓India-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓AgNext Technologies develops AI-powered quality assessment solutions for the agriculture and food supply chain industry, using near-infrared spectroscopy, computer vision, and machine learning to deliver rapid, non-destructive grading of grains, oilseeds, spices, and other agricultural commodities at procurement centers, ports, and processing facilities
Choose Patsnap if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 55/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Funding History
AgNext Technologies raised $10M across 3 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.
AgNext Technologies
Series B
Feb 2019
Series A
Oct 2017
Seed
Jun 2016
Patsnap
Series E
Sep 2021
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Patsnap
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — AgNext Technologies vs Patsnap
Is AgNext Technologies bigger than Patsnap?▾
Which company raised more funding — AgNext Technologies or Patsnap?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded AgNext Technologies vs Patsnap?▾
What does AgNext Technologies do vs Patsnap?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are AgNext Technologies and Patsnap competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Patsnap has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs AgNext Technologies's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Patsnap is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But AgNext Technologies has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.