Skip to main content

Anodot vs Databricks

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Anodot's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Databricks leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Anodot

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Databricks

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$134B
Total Funding
$66M
$20.2B
Awaira Score
55/100
93/100
Employees
100-500
6,000
Founded
2014
2013
Stage
Series C
Private
AnodotDatabricks
Anodot logo
Anodot

🇮🇱 Israel · David Drai

Series CAI DataEst. 2014

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$66M

Awaira Score55/100

100-500 employees

Full Anodot Profile →
Winner
Databricks logo
Databricks

🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi

PrivateAI DataEst. 2013

Valuation

$134B

Total Funding

$20.2B

Awaira Score93/100

6,000 employees

Full Databricks Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Anodot in Israel and Databricks in United States. Different stages (Series C vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

In the AI Data market, Anodot and Databricks represent two distinct approaches. Anodot provides autonomous business monitoring powered by AI, using time-series anomaly detection algorithms to continuously monitor business metrics including revenue, usage, and operational KPIs across enterprise data sources and alert teams to significant deviations before they become customer-visible incidents. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning.

Funding & Valuation

Only Databricks has a public valuation on record ($134B); Anodot's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Databricks has secured $20.2B, outpacing Anodot's $66M by $20.1B.

Growth Stage

The founding gap is narrow: Databricks in 2013 versus Anodot in 2014. Anodot is at Series C while Databricks stands at Private, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, Anodot reports 100-500 employees and Databricks reports 6,000.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: Anodot in 🇮🇱 Israel and Databricks in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. A 38-point gap on the Awaira Score (Databricks: 93, Anodot: 55) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Under David Drai and Ali Ghodsi respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Anodot

Total Rounds4
Avg. Round Size$16.5M
Funding Span4 yrs

Databricks

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$111.4M
Funding Span6.9 yrs

Funding History

Anodot has completed 4 funding rounds, while Databricks has gone through 5. Anodot's most recent round was a Series C of $36.3M, compared to Databricks's Series E ($250M). Anodot is at Series C while Databricks is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Databricks has the bigger team at roughly 6,000 people — 60x the size of Anodot's 100-500. They're close in age — Anodot started in 2014 and Databricks in 2013. Geographically, they're in different markets — Anodot operates out of Israel and Databricks from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricAnodotDatabricks
💰Valuation
N/A
$134B
📈Total Funding
$66M
$20.2BWINS
📅Founded
2014WINS
2013
🚀Stage
Series C
Private
👥Employees
100-500
6,000
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
55
93WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Databricks has raised $20.1B more ($20.2B vs $66M)

📅

Market experience: Databricks has 1 year more (founded 2013 vs 2014)

🚀

Growth stage: Anodot is at Series C vs Databricks at Private

👥

Team size: Anodot has 100-500 employees vs Databricks's 6,000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 Anodot (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Databricks (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Anodot's 55/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Anodot logo

Choose Anodot if…

  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Anodot provides autonomous business monitoring powered by AI, using time-series anomaly detection algorithms to continuously monitor business metrics including revenue, usage, and operational KPIs across enterprise data sources and alert teams to significant deviations before they become customer-visible incidents
Databricks logo

Choose Databricks if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 55/100
  • More established by valuation ($134B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
  • More market experience — founded in 2013
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning

Funding History

Anodot raised $66M across 4 rounds. Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds.

Anodot

Series C

Jun 2018

$36.3M

Series B

Feb 2017

$18.5M

Series A

Oct 2015

$7.9M

Seed

Jun 2014

$3.3M

Databricks

Series E

Aug 2020

$250M

Series D

Apr 2019

$200M

Series C

Dec 2016

$60M

Series B

Jun 2014

$33M

Series A

Sep 2013

Lead: Andreessen Horowitz

$13.9M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Databricks

Andreessen HorowitzSequoia CapitalSalesforce Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Anodot vs Databricks

Is Anodot bigger than Databricks?
Databricks has a disclosed valuation of $134B, while Anodot's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Databricks employs 6,000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Anodot or Databricks?
Databricks has raised more in total funding at $20.2B, compared to Anodot's $66M — a gap of $20.1B. Combined, the two companies have completed 9 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Databricks leads with an Awaira Score of 93/100, while Anodot sits at 55/100. That 38-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Anodot vs Databricks?
Anodot was founded by David Drai in 2014. Databricks was founded by Ali Ghodsi in 2013. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Anodot do vs Databricks?
Anodot: Anodot provides autonomous business monitoring powered by AI, using time-series anomaly detection algorithms to continuously monitor business metrics including revenue, usage, and operational KPIs across enterprise data sources and alert teams to significant deviations before they become customer-visible incidents. The Herzliya company machine learning models learn seasonality, trends, and normal variance patterns for each metric automatically, reducing alert noise by filtering out expected variation and surfacing only genuine anomalies.\n\nThe company raised approximately $66 million in venture funding including a Series C from investors including Aleph VC, Redline Capital, and Transformative AI. Anodot serves telecommunications, fintech, gaming, and digital media clients including T-Mobile, Pandora, and Wix, deploying monitoring across billions of data points daily across client environments. The platform connects to data warehouses, streaming pipelines, and cloud monitoring sources through native integrations.\n\nAnodot competes in the AIOps and business monitoring market against Datadog, New Relic, and Sumo Logic for infrastructure monitoring use cases, and against business intelligence anomaly detection features in Tableau, Looker, and Power BI for business metric monitoring. Its focus on business-layer metric anomaly detection rather than infrastructure-layer monitoring differentiates it in the revenue operations and product analytics segments, where engineering-focused monitoring tools are insufficient for the metric breadth and business context that business operations teams require. Databricks: Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning. The company developed Databricks Lakehouse, which combines data lake and data warehouse capabilities, built on Apache Spark technology. Its platform enables organizations to process large-scale data, build machine learning models, and deploy AI applications through a single interface. The company offers several core products: Databricks SQL for analytics, Databricks Machine Learning for model development, and Databricks Jobs for workflow automation. The platform supports multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Databricks serves enterprises across various industries, with customers including organizations in financial services, technology, and healthcare sectors. As of its latest funding round, Databricks has raised $11.2 billion in total funding and maintains a valuation of $134 billion, positioning it among the highest-valued private AI and data companies. The company achieved Series J funding status, indicating significant capital accumulation and investor confidence. Databricks competes with platforms like Snowflake, Teradata, and cloud-native data solutions from major hyperscalers. The company's growth trajectory reflects strong market demand for integrated data and AI infrastructure, driven by increasing enterprise adoption of machine learning and data-driven decision-making. Databricks unified the traditionally separate data warehouse and data lake approaches through its Lakehouse architecture, creating a single platform for analytics and AI workflows.
Which company was founded first?
Databricks got there first, launching in 2013 — that's 1 year of extra runway. Anodot didn't arrive until 2014. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Anodot has about 100-500 employees; Databricks has about 6,000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Anodot and Databricks competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Anodot and Databricks compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Databricks has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 93 vs Anodot's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Databricks is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Anodot has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive