Anodot vs Databricks
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Databricks is valued at $134B — more than 3x Anodot's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Anodot
0 wins
Databricks
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · David Drai
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$66M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Ali Ghodsi
Valuation
$134B
Total Funding
$20.2B
6,000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Anodot in Israel and Databricks in United States. Different stages (Series C vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
In the AI Data market, Anodot and Databricks represent two distinct approaches. Anodot provides autonomous business monitoring powered by AI, using time-series anomaly detection algorithms to continuously monitor business metrics including revenue, usage, and operational KPIs across enterprise data sources and alert teams to significant deviations before they become customer-visible incidents. Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning.
Funding & Valuation
Only Databricks has a public valuation on record ($134B); Anodot's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Databricks has secured $20.2B, outpacing Anodot's $66M by $20.1B.
Growth Stage
The founding gap is narrow: Databricks in 2013 versus Anodot in 2014. Anodot is at Series C while Databricks stands at Private, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, Anodot reports 100-500 employees and Databricks reports 6,000.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: Anodot in 🇮🇱 Israel and Databricks in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. A 38-point gap on the Awaira Score (Databricks: 93, Anodot: 55) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Under David Drai and Ali Ghodsi respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Anodot
Databricks
Funding History
Anodot has completed 4 funding rounds, while Databricks has gone through 5. Anodot's most recent round was a Series C of $36.3M, compared to Databricks's Series E ($250M). Anodot is at Series C while Databricks is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Databricks has the bigger team at roughly 6,000 people — 60x the size of Anodot's 100-500. They're close in age — Anodot started in 2014 and Databricks in 2013. Geographically, they're in different markets — Anodot operates out of Israel and Databricks from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Anodot | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $134B |
📈Total Funding | $66M | $20.2BWINS |
📅Founded | 2014WINS | 2013 |
🚀Stage | Series C | Private |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 6,000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 55 | 93WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Databricks has raised $20.1B more ($20.2B vs $66M)
Market experience: Databricks has 1 year more (founded 2013 vs 2014)
Growth stage: Anodot is at Series C vs Databricks at Private
Team size: Anodot has 100-500 employees vs Databricks's 6,000
Market base: 🇮🇱 Anodot (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Databricks (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Databricks scores 93/100 vs Anodot's 55/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Anodot if…
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Anodot provides autonomous business monitoring powered by AI, using time-series anomaly detection algorithms to continuously monitor business metrics including revenue, usage, and operational KPIs across enterprise data sources and alert teams to significant deviations before they become customer-visible incidents
Choose Databricks if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 93/100 vs 55/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($134B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $20.2B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2013
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Databricks is an AI and data platform founded in 2013 that provides a unified analytics workspace for data engineering, data science, and machine learning
Funding History
Anodot raised $66M across 4 rounds. Databricks raised $20.2B across 5 rounds.
Anodot
Series C
Jun 2018
Series B
Feb 2017
Series A
Oct 2015
Seed
Jun 2014
Databricks
Series E
Aug 2020
Series D
Apr 2019
Series C
Dec 2016
Series B
Jun 2014
Series A
Sep 2013
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Databricks
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Anodot vs Databricks
Is Anodot bigger than Databricks?▾
Which company raised more funding — Anodot or Databricks?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Anodot vs Databricks?▾
What does Anodot do vs Databricks?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Anodot and Databricks competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Databricks has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 93 vs Anodot's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Databricks is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Anodot has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.