Overall Winner: Apptronik·88/ 100

Apptronik vs Locus Robotics

In-depth comparison — valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Winner
A
Apptronik

🇺🇸 United States · Jeff Cardenas

Series AAI RoboticsEst. 2016

Valuation

$5.5B

Total Funding

$935M

88
Awaira Score88/100

300 employees

Full Apptronik Profile →
L
Locus Robotics

🇺🇸 United States · Rick Faulk

Series FAI RoboticsEst. 2014

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$426M

75
Awaira Score75/100

500-1000 employees

Full Locus Robotics Profile →
🔬

Analyst Summary

Generated from real data · No AI hallucinations

Both Apptronik and Locus Robotics compete directly in the AI Robotics space, making this a head-to-head matchup within the same market segment. Apptronik, founded in 2016, develops humanoid robots designed for industrial and commercial applications. Locus Robotics develops autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and an AI-powered fleet management system for warehouse fulfillment operations.

Apptronik carries a known valuation of $5.5B, while Locus Robotics's valuation has not been publicly disclosed. On the funding side, Apptronik has raised $935M in total — $509M more than Locus Robotics's $426M.

Locus Robotics has 2 years more market experience, having been founded in 2014 compared to Apptronik's 2016 founding. In terms of growth stage, Apptronik is at Series A while Locus Robotics is at Series F — a meaningful difference for investors evaluating risk and upside.

Both companies are headquartered in 🇺🇸 United States, competing for the same regional talent and customer base. On Awaira's 0–100 composite score, Apptronik leads with a score of 88, reflecting stronger overall fundamentals across valuation, funding, and growth signals.

Metrics Comparison

MetricApptronikLocus Robotics
💰Valuation
$5.5B
N/A
📈Total Funding
$935MWINS
$426M
📅Founded
2016WINS
2014
🚀Stage
Series A
Series F
👥Employees
300
500-1000
🌍Country
United States
United States
🏷️Category
AI Robotics
AI Robotics
Awaira Score
88WINS
75

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Apptronik has raised $509M more ($935M vs $426M)

📅

Market experience: Locus Robotics has 2 years more (founded 2014 vs 2016)

🚀

Growth stage: Apptronik is at Series A vs Locus Robotics at Series F

👥

Team size: Apptronik has 300 employees vs Locus Robotics's 500-1000

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Robotics market segment

Awaira Score: Apptronik scores 88/100 vs Locus Robotics's 75/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

A

Choose Apptronik if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 88/100 vs 75/100
  • More established by valuation ($5.5B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $935M
  • Apptronik, founded in 2016, develops humanoid robots designed for industrial and commercial applications
L

Choose Locus Robotics if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2014
  • Locus Robotics develops autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and an AI-powered fleet management system for warehouse fulfillment operations

Funding History

Apptronik raised $935M across 2 rounds. Locus Robotics raised $426M across 0 rounds.

Apptronik

Series A

Jan 2024

$350M

Series A

Jan 2024

$350M

Locus Robotics

No public funding data available.

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Apptronik

OpenAI Startup FundKleiner PerkinsSpark CapitalNvidiaFoxconn

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Apptronik vs Locus Robotics

Is Apptronik bigger than Locus Robotics?
Apptronik has a disclosed valuation of $5.5B, while Locus Robotics's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Apptronik employs 300 people.
Which company raised more funding — Apptronik or Locus Robotics?
Apptronik has raised more in total funding at $935M, compared to Locus Robotics's $426M — a gap of $509M. Combined, the two companies have completed 2 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Apptronik holds the higher Awaira Score at 88/100, compared to Locus Robotics's 75/100. The Awaira Score is a composite metric factoring in valuation, funding, stage, team size, and market presence — a 13-point gap that reflects meaningful differences in scale or traction.
Who founded Apptronik vs Locus Robotics?
Apptronik was founded by Jeff Cardenas in 2016. Locus Robotics was founded by Rick Faulk in 2014. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Apptronik do vs Locus Robotics?
Apptronik: Apptronik, founded in 2016, develops humanoid robots designed for industrial and commercial applications. The company's flagship product is Apollo, a general-purpose humanoid robot engineered to perform tasks in warehouses, manufacturing facilities, and other enterprise environments. Apollo stands approximately 5'8" tall and is designed to handle repetitive, dangerous, or physically demanding work alongside human workers. The robot integrates advanced computer vision, machine learning, and autonomous navigation systems to operate in dynamic environments with minimal human intervention. Apptronik's technology emphasizes dexterous manipulation and adaptive learning, enabling robots to perform tasks including material handling, assembly, inspection, and logistics operations. The company positions itself in the growing humanoid robotics sector, competing with firms like Boston Dynamics, Tesla's Optimus division, and other robotics startups targeting industrial automation. As of its most recent valuation, Apptronik reached $5.5 billion in company value with $935 million in total funding. The company remains in Series A stage, indicating early-stage growth with significant capital deployment ahead. Apptronik has attracted investment from prominent venture capital firms and strategic investors focused on robotics and automation technologies. The company's growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for autonomous solutions to address labor shortages and workplace safety concerns across manufacturing and logistics sectors. Apptronik's focus on general-purpose humanoid robots designed specifically for enterprise task automation differentiates it in a sector where most competitors emphasize research or consumer applications. Locus Robotics: Locus Robotics develops autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and an AI-powered fleet management system for warehouse fulfillment operations. The platform deploys collaborative robots that work alongside human pickers, dynamically optimizing pick paths, task assignment, and robot routing to increase units-per-hour productivity without full warehouse automation replacement.\n\nThe company raised approximately 426 million USD and has deployed its systems in hundreds of fulfillment centers for customers including DHL, Levi Strauss, and Crate and Barrel, demonstrating enterprise-scale operational deployments with measurable throughput improvements. Locus differentiates through its human-robot collaboration model, which allows customers to scale automation incrementally without the capital expenditure of complete facility redesign.\n\nWarehouse automation is accelerating as e-commerce volume grows and labor costs rise in fulfillment markets globally. Locus competes with 6 River Systems (acquired by Shopify), Fetch Robotics (acquired by Zebra), and Geek Plus, in a market where established operators with large deployed robot fleets benefit from operational data advantages that improve routing and task optimization algorithms over time.
Which company was founded first?
Locus Robotics was founded first in 2014, giving it 2 years of additional market experience. Apptronik was founded later in 2016. In AI, even a year or two of head start can translate into significantly more training data, customer relationships, and institutional knowledge.
Which company has more employees?
Apptronik has approximately 300 employees, while Locus Robotics has approximately 500-1000. A larger team often signals higher revenue or venture backing, but in AI, smaller teams are increasingly capable of building at scale.
Are Apptronik and Locus Robotics competitors?
Yes, Apptronik and Locus Robotics are direct competitors — both operate in the AI Robotics space and likely target overlapping customer segments. This comparison is especially relevant for buyers evaluating both platforms.