Baraja vs Figure AI
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Figure AI is valued at $39B — more than 3x Baraja's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Baraja
1 win
Figure AI
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇦🇺 Australia · Federico Collarte
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$32M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Brett Adcock
Valuation
$39B
Total Funding
$1.9B
450 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Robotics space, though from different geographies — Baraja in Australia and Figure AI in United States. Different stages (Series B vs Series C) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Robotics, Baraja and Figure AI rank among the most closely watched rivals. Baraja develops a novel lidar technology called Spectrum-Scan that steers laser beams using the natural dispersion of light through a prism rather than mechanical rotating mirrors or solid-state optical phased arrays, producing a solid-state lidar architecture that is more reliable and cost-effective than mechanical lidar alternatives for autonomous vehicle and robotics applications. Figure AI is a robotics company founded in 2022 that develops humanoid robots designed for industrial and commercial applications.
Funding & Valuation
Only Figure AI has a public valuation on record ($39B); Baraja's has not been disclosed. Figure AI has amassed $1.9B in total funding, far exceeding Baraja's $32M.
Growth Stage
Figure AI is the younger company by 6 years, having launched in 2022 compared to Baraja's 2016 founding. Growth stages differ: Baraja (Series B) versus Figure AI (Series C), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Baraja reports 100-500 employees and Figure AI reports 450.
Geography & Outlook
Baraja operates out of 🇦🇺 Australia while Figure AI is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Figure AI scores 95 on Awaira's composite index versus Baraja's 50, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Federico Collarte and Brett Adcock respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Baraja
Figure AI
Funding History
Baraja has completed 3 funding rounds, while Figure AI has gone through 4. Baraja's most recent round was a Series B of $22.4M, compared to Figure AI's Series C ($1B). Baraja is at Series B while Figure AI is at Series C — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Figure AI has the bigger team at roughly 450 people — 5x the size of Baraja's 100-500. Baraja has a 6-year head start, founded in 2016 vs Figure AI's 2022. Geographically, they're in different markets — Baraja operates out of Australia and Figure AI from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Baraja | Figure AI |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $39B |
📈Total Funding | $32M | $1.9BWINS |
📅Founded | 2016 | 2022WINS |
🚀Stage | Series B | Series C |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 450 |
🌍Country | Australia | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Robotics | AI Robotics |
⭐Awaira Score | 50 | 95WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Figure AI has raised $1.9B more ($1.9B vs $32M)
Market experience: Baraja has 6 years more (founded 2016 vs 2022)
Growth stage: Baraja is at Series B vs Figure AI at Series C
Team size: Baraja has 100-500 employees vs Figure AI's 450
Market base: 🇦🇺 Baraja (Australia) vs 🇺🇸 Figure AI (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Robotics market segment
Awaira Score: Figure AI scores 95/100 vs Baraja's 50/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Baraja if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2016
- ✓Australia-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Baraja develops a novel lidar technology called Spectrum-Scan that steers laser beams using the natural dispersion of light through a prism rather than mechanical rotating mirrors or solid-state optical phased arrays, producing a solid-state lidar architecture that is more reliable and cost-effective than mechanical lidar alternatives for autonomous vehicle and robotics applications
Choose Figure AI if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 95/100 vs 50/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($39B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $1.9B
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Figure AI is a robotics company founded in 2022 that develops humanoid robots designed for industrial and commercial applications
Funding History
Baraja raised $32M across 3 rounds. Figure AI raised $1.9B across 4 rounds.
Baraja
Series B
Feb 2019
Series A
Oct 2017
Seed
Jun 2016
Figure AI
Series C
Sep 2025
Lead: Parkway Venture Capital
Series B
Feb 2024
Lead: Microsoft
Series A
May 2023
Lead: Parkway Venture Capital
Seed
Sep 2022
Lead: Brett Adcock
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Figure AI
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Baraja vs Figure AI
Is Baraja bigger than Figure AI?▾
Which company raised more funding — Baraja or Figure AI?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Baraja vs Figure AI?▾
What does Baraja do vs Figure AI?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Baraja and Figure AI competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Figure AI has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 95 vs Baraja's 50. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Figure AI is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Baraja has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.