BenevolentAI vs Butterfly Network
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Butterfly Network is valued at $957M — more than 3x BenevolentAI's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
BenevolentAI
0 wins
Butterfly Network
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Joanna Shields
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$292M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · John Martin
Valuation
$957M
Total Funding
$370M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Healthcare space, though from different geographies — BenevolentAI in United Kingdom and Butterfly Network in United States. Different stages (Acquired vs Public) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
BenevolentAI and Butterfly Network are direct competitors in AI Healthcare. BenevolentAI applies machine learning to drug discovery, using knowledge graph technology and predictive AI models to identify novel drug candidates and repurpose existing compounds for new therapeutic applications. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging.
Funding & Valuation
Only Butterfly Network has a public valuation on record ($957M); BenevolentAI's has not been disclosed. Both have attracted significant capital — Butterfly Network with $370M and BenevolentAI with $292M.
Growth Stage
Established in 2011, Butterfly Network has a modest 2-year head start over BenevolentAI (2013). BenevolentAI is at Acquired while Butterfly Network stands at Public, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, BenevolentAI reports 100-500 employees and Butterfly Network reports 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
BenevolentAI operates out of 🇬🇧 United Kingdom while Butterfly Network is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Butterfly Network scores 85 on Awaira's composite index versus BenevolentAI's 62, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Joanna Shields and John Martin respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
BenevolentAI
Butterfly Network
Funding History
BenevolentAI has completed 5 funding rounds, while Butterfly Network has gone through 5. BenevolentAI's most recent round was a Series D of $116.8M, compared to Butterfly Network's Series D ($148M). BenevolentAI is at Acquired while Butterfly Network is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Butterfly Network has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 5x the size of BenevolentAI's 100-500. They're close in age — BenevolentAI started in 2013 and Butterfly Network in 2011. Geographically, they're in different markets — BenevolentAI operates out of United Kingdom and Butterfly Network from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BenevolentAI | Butterfly Network |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $957M |
📈Total Funding | $292M | $370MWINS |
📅Founded | 2013WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Acquired | Public |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | United Kingdom | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Healthcare | AI Healthcare |
⭐Awaira Score | 62 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $78M more ($370M vs $292M)
Market experience: Butterfly Network has 2 years more (founded 2011 vs 2013)
Growth stage: BenevolentAI is at Acquired vs Butterfly Network at Public
Team size: BenevolentAI has 100-500 employees vs Butterfly Network's 500-1000
Market base: 🇬🇧 BenevolentAI (United Kingdom) vs 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment
Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs BenevolentAI's 62/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose BenevolentAI if…
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓BenevolentAI applies machine learning to drug discovery, using knowledge graph technology and predictive AI models to identify novel drug candidates and repurpose existing compounds for new therapeutic applications
Choose Butterfly Network if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 62/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($957M)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $370M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging
Funding History
BenevolentAI raised $292M across 5 rounds. Butterfly Network raised $370M across 5 rounds.
BenevolentAI
Series D
Oct 2018
Lead: Temasek Holdings
Series C
Jun 2017
Lead: Temasek Holdings
Series B
Feb 2016
Lead: Woodford Investment Management
Series A
Oct 2014
Lead: Woodford Investment Management
Seed
Jun 2013
Lead: Ken Griffin
Butterfly Network
Series D
Oct 2016
Series C
Jun 2015
Series B
Feb 2014
Series A
Oct 2012
Seed
Jun 2011
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to BenevolentAI
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — BenevolentAI vs Butterfly Network
Is BenevolentAI bigger than Butterfly Network?▾
Which company raised more funding — BenevolentAI or Butterfly Network?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded BenevolentAI vs Butterfly Network?▾
What does BenevolentAI do vs Butterfly Network?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are BenevolentAI and Butterfly Network competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Butterfly Network has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 85 vs BenevolentAI's 62. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Butterfly Network is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But BenevolentAI has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.