Skip to main content

BreezoMeter vs Weights and Biases

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Weights and Biases is valued at $1.3B — more than 3x BreezoMeter's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Weights and Biases leads on 3 of 4 metrics

BreezoMeter

1 win

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Weights and Biases

3 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$1.3B
Total Funding
$21M
$250M
Awaira Score
42/100
80/100
Employees
1-50
300
Founded
2014
2017
Stage
Series B
Acquired
BreezoMeterWeights and Biases
BreezoMeter logo
BreezoMeter

🇮🇱 Israel · Ran Korber

Series BAI DataEst. 2014

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$21M

Awaira Score42/100

1-50 employees

Full BreezoMeter Profile →
Winner
Weights and Biases logo
Weights and Biases

🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald

AcquiredAI DataEst. 2017

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$250M

Awaira Score80/100

300 employees

Full Weights and Biases Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — BreezoMeter in Israel and Weights and Biases in United States. Different stages (Series B vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within AI Data, BreezoMeter and Weights and Biases rank among the most closely watched rivals. BreezoMeter provides AI-powered environmental data APIs covering air quality, pollen, weather, and wildfire risk, aggregating data from government monitoring stations, satellite imagery, and IoT sensors and applying machine learning models to produce street-level resolution environmental intelligence that application developers and enterprises integrate into health, insurance, and mobility products. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development.

Funding & Valuation

Only Weights and Biases has a public valuation on record ($1.3B); BreezoMeter's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Weights and Biases has secured $250M, outpacing BreezoMeter's $21M by $229M.

Growth Stage

BreezoMeter was founded in 2014, 3 years before Weights and Biases arrived in 2017. Growth stages differ: BreezoMeter (Series B) versus Weights and Biases (Acquired), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: BreezoMeter employs 1-50 people versus Weights and Biases's 300.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: BreezoMeter in 🇮🇱 Israel and Weights and Biases in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Weights and Biases leads decisively at 80 compared to BreezoMeter's 42. Under Ran Korber and Lukas Biewald respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

BreezoMeter

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$7M
Funding Span2.7 yrs

Weights and Biases

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$49M
Funding Span5.6 yrs

Funding History

BreezoMeter has completed 3 funding rounds, while Weights and Biases has gone through 5. BreezoMeter's most recent round was a Series B of $14.7M, compared to Weights and Biases's Series C ($50M). BreezoMeter is at Series B while Weights and Biases is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Weights and Biases has the bigger team at roughly 300 people — 300x the size of BreezoMeter's 1-50. BreezoMeter has a 3-year head start, founded in 2014 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — BreezoMeter operates out of Israel and Weights and Biases from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricBreezoMeterWeights and Biases
💰Valuation
N/A
$1.3B
📈Total Funding
$21M
$250MWINS
📅Founded
2014
2017WINS
🚀Stage
Series B
Acquired
👥Employees
1-50
300
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
42
80WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Weights and Biases has raised $229M more ($250M vs $21M)

📅

Market experience: BreezoMeter has 3 years more (founded 2014 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: BreezoMeter is at Series B vs Weights and Biases at Acquired

👥

Team size: BreezoMeter has 1-50 employees vs Weights and Biases's 300

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 BreezoMeter (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Weights and Biases scores 80/100 vs BreezoMeter's 42/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

BreezoMeter logo

Choose BreezoMeter if…

  • More market experience — founded in 2014
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • BreezoMeter provides AI-powered environmental data APIs covering air quality, pollen, weather, and wildfire risk, aggregating data from government monitoring stations, satellite imagery, and IoT sensors and applying machine learning models to produce street-level resolution environmental intelligence that application developers and enterprises integrate into health, insurance, and mobility products
Weights and Biases logo

Choose Weights and Biases if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 42/100
  • More established by valuation ($1.3B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $250M
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development

Funding History

BreezoMeter raised $21M across 3 rounds. Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds.

BreezoMeter

Series B

Feb 2017

$14.7M

Series A

Oct 2015

$4.6M

Seed

Jun 2014

$1.7M

Weights and Biases

Series C

Aug 2023

Lead: Daniel Gross

$50M

Series C

Sep 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$125M

Series B

Mar 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$50M

Series A

Apr 2019

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$15M

Series A

Jan 2018

Lead: Google Ventures

$5M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Weights and Biases

Daniel GrossSequoia CapitalGoogle VenturesSalesforce VenturesAndreessen Horowitz

Users Also Compare

FAQ — BreezoMeter vs Weights and Biases

Is BreezoMeter bigger than Weights and Biases?
Weights and Biases has a disclosed valuation of $1.3B, while BreezoMeter's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Weights and Biases employs 300 people.
Which company raised more funding — BreezoMeter or Weights and Biases?
Weights and Biases has raised more in total funding at $250M, compared to BreezoMeter's $21M — a gap of $229M. Combined, the two companies have completed 8 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Weights and Biases leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while BreezoMeter sits at 42/100. That 38-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded BreezoMeter vs Weights and Biases?
BreezoMeter was founded by Ran Korber in 2014. Weights and Biases was founded by Lukas Biewald in 2017. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does BreezoMeter do vs Weights and Biases?
BreezoMeter: BreezoMeter provides AI-powered environmental data APIs covering air quality, pollen, weather, and wildfire risk, aggregating data from government monitoring stations, satellite imagery, and IoT sensors and applying machine learning models to produce street-level resolution environmental intelligence that application developers and enterprises integrate into health, insurance, and mobility products. The Haifa company delivers real-time and forecast environmental data at hyperlocal granularity that government monitoring networks cannot match.\n\nThe company raised approximately $21 million in venture funding and was acquired by Google in 2022, integrating its environmental data capabilities into Google Maps, Google Search, and Google Nest products. Prior to acquisition, BreezoMeter had built API customers including insurance companies for climate risk underwriting, asthma and respiratory health applications for personalised air quality alerts, and HVAC companies for air filtration product recommendations tied to local pollution levels.\n\nBreezoMeter competed in the environmental data and climate intelligence market alongside AirVisual (IQAir), PurpleAir, and government air quality data portals. The acquisition by Google reflected the strategic value of hyperlocal environmental data as an enrichment layer for mapping, local search, and home automation products where air quality and pollen information enhances the relevance of location-based recommendations. The combination of machine learning interpolation and sensor fusion to generate street-level environmental data from sparse monitoring networks represented a technically defensible approach that aligned with Google investment in location data quality. Weights and Biases: Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. The company's core product enables data scientists and ML engineers to log, visualize, and compare machine learning experiments, addressing the reproducibility and collaboration challenges inherent in modern AI workflows. The platform integrates with popular ML frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn, allowing teams to track metrics, parameters, and outputs across training runs. W&B's offering extends to model registry capabilities, enabling organizations to version, document, and deploy models systematically. The company serves enterprises across computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning domains. As of its Series C funding stage, Weights and Biases has raised $250 million at a $1.3 billion valuation, positioning it among well-capitalized AI infrastructure startups. The company competes in the ML operations space alongside platforms like Databricks and Neptune, differentiating through its focus on experiment tracking and accessibility to individual practitioners and teams. Notable adoption spans research institutions and technology companies implementing large-scale ML pipelines. The platform's freemium model has facilitated rapid adoption within the academic and startup ecosystems, while enterprise offerings target organizations requiring advanced governance and integration capabilities. Growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for ML operations infrastructure. Weights and Biases occupies a critical position in the ML operations stack by specializing in experiment tracking and model management, essential infrastructure that bridges individual data scientist workflows and enterprise-scale ML deployment.
Which company was founded first?
BreezoMeter got there first, launching in 2014 — that's 3 years of extra runway. Weights and Biases didn't arrive until 2017. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
BreezoMeter has about 1-50 employees; Weights and Biases has about 300. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are BreezoMeter and Weights and Biases competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both BreezoMeter and Weights and Biases compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Weights and Biases has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs BreezoMeter's 42. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Weights and Biases is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But BreezoMeter has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive