BreezoMeter vs Weights and Biases
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Weights and Biases is valued at $1.3B — more than 3x BreezoMeter's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
BreezoMeter
1 win
Weights and Biases
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Ran Korber
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$21M
1-50 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$250M
300 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — BreezoMeter in Israel and Weights and Biases in United States. Different stages (Series B vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Data, BreezoMeter and Weights and Biases rank among the most closely watched rivals. BreezoMeter provides AI-powered environmental data APIs covering air quality, pollen, weather, and wildfire risk, aggregating data from government monitoring stations, satellite imagery, and IoT sensors and applying machine learning models to produce street-level resolution environmental intelligence that application developers and enterprises integrate into health, insurance, and mobility products. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development.
Funding & Valuation
Only Weights and Biases has a public valuation on record ($1.3B); BreezoMeter's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Weights and Biases has secured $250M, outpacing BreezoMeter's $21M by $229M.
Growth Stage
BreezoMeter was founded in 2014, 3 years before Weights and Biases arrived in 2017. Growth stages differ: BreezoMeter (Series B) versus Weights and Biases (Acquired), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: BreezoMeter employs 1-50 people versus Weights and Biases's 300.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: BreezoMeter in 🇮🇱 Israel and Weights and Biases in 🇺🇸 United States, each benefiting from local ecosystems. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Weights and Biases leads decisively at 80 compared to BreezoMeter's 42. Under Ran Korber and Lukas Biewald respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
BreezoMeter
Weights and Biases
Funding History
BreezoMeter has completed 3 funding rounds, while Weights and Biases has gone through 5. BreezoMeter's most recent round was a Series B of $14.7M, compared to Weights and Biases's Series C ($50M). BreezoMeter is at Series B while Weights and Biases is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Weights and Biases has the bigger team at roughly 300 people — 300x the size of BreezoMeter's 1-50. BreezoMeter has a 3-year head start, founded in 2014 vs Weights and Biases's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — BreezoMeter operates out of Israel and Weights and Biases from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BreezoMeter | Weights and Biases |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1.3B |
📈Total Funding | $21M | $250MWINS |
📅Founded | 2014 | 2017WINS |
🚀Stage | Series B | Acquired |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 300 |
🌍Country | Israel | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 42 | 80WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Weights and Biases has raised $229M more ($250M vs $21M)
Market experience: BreezoMeter has 3 years more (founded 2014 vs 2017)
Growth stage: BreezoMeter is at Series B vs Weights and Biases at Acquired
Team size: BreezoMeter has 1-50 employees vs Weights and Biases's 300
Market base: 🇮🇱 BreezoMeter (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Weights and Biases scores 80/100 vs BreezoMeter's 42/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose BreezoMeter if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2014
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓BreezoMeter provides AI-powered environmental data APIs covering air quality, pollen, weather, and wildfire risk, aggregating data from government monitoring stations, satellite imagery, and IoT sensors and applying machine learning models to produce street-level resolution environmental intelligence that application developers and enterprises integrate into health, insurance, and mobility products
Choose Weights and Biases if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 42/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.3B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $250M
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Funding History
BreezoMeter raised $21M across 3 rounds. Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds.
BreezoMeter
Series B
Feb 2017
Series A
Oct 2015
Seed
Jun 2014
Weights and Biases
Series C
Aug 2023
Lead: Daniel Gross
Series C
Sep 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Mar 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Apr 2019
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2018
Lead: Google Ventures
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Weights and Biases
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — BreezoMeter vs Weights and Biases
Is BreezoMeter bigger than Weights and Biases?▾
Which company raised more funding — BreezoMeter or Weights and Biases?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded BreezoMeter vs Weights and Biases?▾
What does BreezoMeter do vs Weights and Biases?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are BreezoMeter and Weights and Biases competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Weights and Biases has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs BreezoMeter's 42. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Weights and Biases is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But BreezoMeter has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.