Captions vs Grammarly
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Grammarly is valued at $13B — more than 3x Captions's $500M.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Captions
0 wins
Grammarly
5 wins
Key Numbers
🇺🇸 United States · Gaurav Misra
Valuation
$500M
Total Funding
$100M
150 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Alex Shevchenko
Valuation
$13B
Total Funding
$545M
2500 employees
This is a head-to-head contest: both operate in Enterprise AI and share a home market in United States. Different stages (Series C vs Private) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within Enterprise AI, Captions and Grammarly rank among the most closely watched rivals. Captions is an enterprise AI company founded in 2021 that develops video understanding and analysis technology. Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels.
Funding & Valuation
Grammarly commands a $13B valuation — roughly 26x that of Captions at $500M, a gap that underscores their different scales. Grammarly has amassed $545M in total funding, far exceeding Captions's $100M.
Growth Stage
Grammarly (est. 2009) predates Captions (est. 2021) by 12 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Growth stages differ: Captions (Series C) versus Grammarly (Private), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Captions reports 150 employees and Grammarly reports 2500.
Geography & Outlook
Captions and Grammarly share a home market in 🇺🇸 United States, intensifying their competitive overlap. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Grammarly leads decisively at 88 compared to Captions's 67. Under Gaurav Misra and Alex Shevchenko respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Captions
Grammarly
Funding History
Captions has completed 2 funding rounds, while Grammarly has gone through 3. Captions's most recent round was a Series C of $60M, compared to Grammarly's Series E ($200M). Captions is at Series C while Grammarly is at Private — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Grammarly has the bigger team at roughly 2500 people — 17x the size of Captions's 150. Grammarly has a 12-year head start, founded in 2009 vs Captions's 2021. Both are based in United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Captions | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $500M | $13BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $100M | $545MWINS |
📅Founded | 2021WINS | 2009 |
🚀Stage | Series C | Private |
👥Employees | 150 | 2500 |
🌍Country | United States | United States |
🏷️Category | Enterprise AI | Enterprise AI |
⭐Awaira Score | 67 | 88WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Grammarly is valued 26x higher ($13B vs $500M)
Funding gap: Grammarly has raised $445M more ($545M vs $100M)
Market experience: Grammarly has 12 years more (founded 2009 vs 2021)
Growth stage: Captions is at Series C vs Grammarly at Private
Team size: Captions has 150 employees vs Grammarly's 2500
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment
Awaira Score: Grammarly scores 88/100 vs Captions's 67/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Captions if…
- ✓Captions is an enterprise AI company founded in 2021 that develops video understanding and analysis technology
Choose Grammarly if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 88/100 vs 67/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($13B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $545M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2009
- ✓Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistance platform founded in 2009 that provides real-time grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style corrections across digital communication channels
Funding History
Captions raised $100M across 2 rounds. Grammarly raised $545M across 3 rounds.
Captions
Series C
Jun 2024
Lead: Kleiner Perkins
Series B
Jun 2023
Lead: Andreessen Horowitz
Grammarly
Series E
Jul 2021
Series D
Oct 2019
Lead: Dragoneer Growth Investments
Series C
Jan 2017
Lead: General Catalyst
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Captions
Unique to Grammarly
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Captions vs Grammarly
Is Captions bigger than Grammarly?▾
Which company raised more funding — Captions or Grammarly?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Captions vs Grammarly?▾
What does Captions do vs Grammarly?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Captions and Grammarly competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Grammarly has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 88 vs Captions's 67. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Grammarly is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Captions has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.