Celonis vs Glean
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Celonis has raised $2B — double what Glean has pulled in.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Celonis
5 wins
Glean
0 wins
Key Numbers
🇩🇪 Germany · Alexander Rinke
Valuation
$13B
Total Funding
$2B
1000+ employees
🇺🇸 United States · Arvind Jain
Valuation
$7.2B
Total Funding
$770M
500 employees
As Enterprise AI players, Celonis and Glean target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Celonis at Series D vs Glean at Series F — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Enterprise AI remains a contested market, with Celonis and Glean among its most prominent entrants. Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow. Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data.
Funding & Valuation
Valuations are in a similar range: Celonis at $13B and Glean at $7.2B. In aggregate funding, Celonis edges ahead at $2B versus Glean's $770M.
Growth Stage
With a 8-year head start, Celonis (founded 2011) has had considerably more time to mature than Glean (2019). Celonis is at Series D while Glean stands at Series F, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Celonis has 1000+ employees and Glean has 500.
Geography & Outlook
Celonis operates out of 🇩🇪 Germany while Glean is based in 🇺🇸 United States, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. The Awaira Score gives Celonis (90) a notable lead over Glean (82). Celonis, led by Alexander Rinke, and Glean, led by Arvind Jain, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
Celonis
Glean
Funding History
Celonis has completed 3 funding rounds, while Glean has gone through 5. Celonis's most recent round was a Series D of $1B, compared to Glean's Series E ($230M). Celonis is at Series D while Glean is at Series F — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Celonis has about 1000+ people and Glean has around 500. Celonis has a 8-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Glean's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Celonis operates out of Germany and Glean from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Celonis | Glean |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $13BWINS | $7.2B |
📈Total Funding | $2BWINS | $770M |
📅Founded | 2011 | 2019WINS |
🚀Stage | Series D | Series F |
👥Employees | 1000+ | 500 |
🌍Country | Germany | United States |
🏷️Category | Enterprise AI | Enterprise AI |
⭐Awaira Score | 90WINS | 82 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Celonis is valued 1.8x higher ($13B vs $7.2B)
Funding gap: Celonis has raised $1.2B more ($2B vs $770M)
Market experience: Celonis has 8 years more (founded 2011 vs 2019)
Growth stage: Celonis is at Series D vs Glean at Series F
Team size: Celonis has 1000+ employees vs Glean's 500
Market base: 🇩🇪 Celonis (Germany) vs 🇺🇸 Glean (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment
Awaira Score: Celonis scores 90/100 vs Glean's 82/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Celonis if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 90/100 vs 82/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($13B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Germany-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow
Choose Glean if…
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data
Funding History
Celonis raised $2B across 3 rounds. Glean raised $770M across 5 rounds.
Celonis
Series D
Jun 2021
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series C
Nov 2020
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series B
Jun 2018
Lead: Accel
Glean
Series E
Jan 2024
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series D
Jan 2023
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series C
Jan 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Jan 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2020
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Celonis
Unique to Glean
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Celonis vs Glean
Is Celonis bigger than Glean?▾
Which company raised more funding — Celonis or Glean?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Celonis vs Glean?▾
What does Celonis do vs Glean?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Celonis and Glean competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Celonis edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 90, but Glean (82) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Celonis has a slight edge on paper, but Glean isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.