Cervest vs Patsnap
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Patsnap is valued at $1B — more than 3x Cervest's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Cervest
0 wins
Patsnap
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Iggy Bassi
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$32M
1-50 employees
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Cervest in United Kingdom and Patsnap in Singapore. Different stages (Series A vs Series E) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Cervest and Patsnap are direct competitors in AI Data. Cervest builds a climate intelligence platform that quantifies climate risk for physical assets including agricultural land, commercial real estate, and infrastructure, using AI models that integrate climate science projections with asset-level data to produce probabilistic risk scores across multiple climate scenarios and time horizons. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.
Funding & Valuation
Only Patsnap has a public valuation on record ($1B); Cervest's has not been disclosed. Patsnap has amassed $300M in total funding, far exceeding Cervest's $32M.
Growth Stage
Patsnap (est. 2007) predates Cervest (est. 2016) by 9 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Stage-wise, Cervest is classified as Series A and Patsnap as Series E, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. On headcount, Cervest reports 1-50 employees and Patsnap reports 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: Cervest in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom and Patsnap in 🇸🇬 Singapore, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Patsnap scores 80 on Awaira's composite index versus Cervest's 45, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Iggy Bassi and Jeffrey Tiong respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Cervest
Patsnap
Funding History
Cervest has completed 2 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. Cervest's most recent round was a Series A of $26.6M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). Cervest is at Series A while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Patsnap has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 500x the size of Cervest's 1-50. Patsnap has a 9-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Cervest's 2016. Geographically, they're in different markets — Cervest operates out of United Kingdom and Patsnap from Singapore.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Cervest | Patsnap |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1B |
📈Total Funding | $32M | $300MWINS |
📅Founded | 2016WINS | 2007 |
🚀Stage | Series A | Series E |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | United Kingdom | Singapore |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 45 | 80WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $268M more ($300M vs $32M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 9 years more (founded 2007 vs 2016)
Growth stage: Cervest is at Series A vs Patsnap at Series E
Team size: Cervest has 1-50 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000
Market base: 🇬🇧 Cervest (United Kingdom) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Patsnap scores 80/100 vs Cervest's 45/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Cervest if…
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Cervest builds a climate intelligence platform that quantifies climate risk for physical assets including agricultural land, commercial real estate, and infrastructure, using AI models that integrate climate science projections with asset-level data to produce probabilistic risk scores across multiple climate scenarios and time horizons
Choose Patsnap if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 45/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Funding History
Cervest raised $32M across 2 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.
Cervest
Series A
Oct 2017
Seed
Jun 2016
Patsnap
Series E
Sep 2021
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Patsnap
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Cervest vs Patsnap
Is Cervest bigger than Patsnap?▾
Which company raised more funding — Cervest or Patsnap?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Cervest vs Patsnap?▾
What does Cervest do vs Patsnap?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Cervest and Patsnap competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Patsnap has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs Cervest's 45. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Patsnap is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Cervest has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.