Skip to main content

Coralogix vs Weights and Biases

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Two AI Data companies going head to head.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Weights and Biases leads on 3 of 5 metrics

Coralogix

2 wins

-Valuation
+Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
+Experience

Weights and Biases

3 wins

+Valuation
-Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1B
$1.3B
Total Funding
$350M
$250M
Awaira Score
68/100
80/100
Employees
100-500
300
Founded
2015
2017
Stage
Series E
Acquired
CoralogixWeights and Biases
Coralogix logo
Coralogix

🇮🇱 Israel · Ariel Assaraf

Series EAI DataEst. 2015

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$350M

Awaira Score68/100

100-500 employees

Full Coralogix Profile →
Winner
Weights and Biases logo
Weights and Biases

🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald

AcquiredAI DataEst. 2017

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$250M

Awaira Score80/100

300 employees

Full Weights and Biases Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Coralogix in Israel and Weights and Biases in United States. Different stages (Series E vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within AI Data, Coralogix and Weights and Biases rank among the most closely watched rivals. Coralogix provides a machine learning-powered log analytics and observability platform that uses AI to reduce the volume of logs requiring full indexing and storage, applying streaming ML analysis to detect patterns, anomalies, and insights in log data without requiring all data to be indexed at query time. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development.

Funding & Valuation

Weights and Biases ($1.3B) is valued slightly above Coralogix ($1B), keeping them in the same tier. Coralogix has raised $350M while Weights and Biases has raised $250M, keeping their war chests in the same ballpark.

Growth Stage

Established in 2015, Coralogix has a modest 2-year head start over Weights and Biases (2017). Stage-wise, Coralogix is classified as Series E and Weights and Biases as Acquired, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. On headcount, Coralogix reports 100-500 employees and Weights and Biases reports 300.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇮🇱 Israel and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Coralogix and Weights and Biases tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. Awaira rates Weights and Biases at 80 and Coralogix at 68, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Under Ariel Assaraf and Lukas Biewald respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Coralogix

Total Rounds6
Avg. Round Size$57.9M
Funding Span10.5 yrs

Weights and Biases

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$49M
Funding Span5.6 yrs

Funding History

Coralogix has completed 6 funding rounds, while Weights and Biases has gone through 5. Coralogix's most recent round was a Series E of $115M, compared to Weights and Biases's Series C ($50M). Coralogix is at Series E while Weights and Biases is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Weights and Biases has the bigger team at roughly 300 people — 3x the size of Coralogix's 100-500. They're close in age — Coralogix started in 2015 and Weights and Biases in 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Coralogix operates out of Israel and Weights and Biases from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricCoralogixWeights and Biases
💰Valuation
$1B
$1.3BWINS
📈Total Funding
$350MWINS
$250M
📅Founded
2015
2017WINS
🚀Stage
Series E
Acquired
👥Employees
100-500
300
🌍Country
Israel
United States
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
68
80WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Weights and Biases is valued 1.3x higher ($1.3B vs $1B)

📈

Funding gap: Coralogix has raised $100M more ($350M vs $250M)

📅

Market experience: Coralogix has 2 years more (founded 2015 vs 2017)

🚀

Growth stage: Coralogix is at Series E vs Weights and Biases at Acquired

👥

Team size: Coralogix has 100-500 employees vs Weights and Biases's 300

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 Coralogix (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Weights and Biases scores 80/100 vs Coralogix's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Coralogix logo

Choose Coralogix if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $350M
  • More market experience — founded in 2015
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Coralogix provides a machine learning-powered log analytics and observability platform that uses AI to reduce the volume of logs requiring full indexing and storage, applying streaming ML analysis to detect patterns, anomalies, and insights in log data without requiring all data to be indexed at query time
Weights and Biases logo

Choose Weights and Biases if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 68/100
  • More established by valuation ($1.3B)
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development

Funding History

Coralogix raised $350M across 6 rounds. Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds.

Coralogix

Series E

Jun 2025

Lead: NewView Capital

$115M

Series D

Jun 2022

Lead: Greenfield Partners

$142M

Series C

Jul 2021

Lead: Greenfield Partners

$55M

Series B

Sep 2020

Lead: Red Dot Capital Partners

$25M

Series A

Nov 2019

Lead: Aleph

$10M

Seed

Jan 2015

$500K

Weights and Biases

Series C

Aug 2023

Lead: Daniel Gross

$50M

Series C

Sep 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$125M

Series B

Mar 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$50M

Series A

Apr 2019

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$15M

Series A

Jan 2018

Lead: Google Ventures

$5M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Coralogix

NewView CapitalGreenfield PartnersSoftBank Vision Fund 2Red Dot Capital PartnersAleph

Unique to Weights and Biases

Daniel GrossSequoia CapitalGoogle VenturesSalesforce VenturesAndreessen Horowitz

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Coralogix vs Weights and Biases

Is Coralogix bigger than Weights and Biases?
By valuation, Weights and Biases is the larger company at $1.3B versus $1B — a 1.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Coralogix employs 100-500 people while Weights and Biases has 300 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Coralogix or Weights and Biases?
Coralogix has raised more in total funding at $350M, compared to Weights and Biases's $250M — a gap of $100M. Combined, the two companies have completed 11 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Weights and Biases leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while Coralogix sits at 68/100. That 12-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Coralogix vs Weights and Biases?
Coralogix was founded by Ariel Assaraf in 2015. Weights and Biases was founded by Lukas Biewald in 2017. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Coralogix do vs Weights and Biases?
Coralogix: Coralogix provides a machine learning-powered log analytics and observability platform that uses AI to reduce the volume of logs requiring full indexing and storage, applying streaming ML analysis to detect patterns, anomalies, and insights in log data without requiring all data to be indexed at query time. The Tel Aviv and San Francisco company stateful streaming approach reduces observability costs significantly compared to traditional log management tools that index and store all data regardless of utility.\n\nThe company raised approximately $270 000 000 including a Series D round from investors including Brighton Park Capital, Greenfield Partners, and Telstra Ventures. Coralogix counts technology companies and enterprises across cloud-native software development, fintech, and SaaS as clients, competing on cost efficiency relative to Datadog, Splunk, and New Relic for engineering teams with high log ingestion volumes and constrained observability budgets.\n\nCoralogix competes in the log management and observability market where Datadog, Elastic, and Grafana hold dominant positions. Its cost optimization positioning resonates with engineering teams managing rapid data growth who face steeply rising observability bills from usage-based pricing models at incumbent vendors. The company TCO reduction messaging is backed by architectural decisions that trade query flexibility at indexing time for streaming ML analysis that surfaces issues without storing all log data, a trade-off that appeals to cost-conscious engineering operations teams at high-growth software companies. Weights and Biases: Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. The company's core product enables data scientists and ML engineers to log, visualize, and compare machine learning experiments, addressing the reproducibility and collaboration challenges inherent in modern AI workflows. The platform integrates with popular ML frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn, allowing teams to track metrics, parameters, and outputs across training runs. W&B's offering extends to model registry capabilities, enabling organizations to version, document, and deploy models systematically. The company serves enterprises across computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning domains. As of its Series C funding stage, Weights and Biases has raised $250 million at a $1.3 billion valuation, positioning it among well-capitalized AI infrastructure startups. The company competes in the ML operations space alongside platforms like Databricks and Neptune, differentiating through its focus on experiment tracking and accessibility to individual practitioners and teams. Notable adoption spans research institutions and technology companies implementing large-scale ML pipelines. The platform's freemium model has facilitated rapid adoption within the academic and startup ecosystems, while enterprise offerings target organizations requiring advanced governance and integration capabilities. Growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for ML operations infrastructure. Weights and Biases occupies a critical position in the ML operations stack by specializing in experiment tracking and model management, essential infrastructure that bridges individual data scientist workflows and enterprise-scale ML deployment.
Which company was founded first?
Coralogix got there first, launching in 2015 — that's 2 years of extra runway. Weights and Biases didn't arrive until 2017. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Coralogix has about 100-500 employees; Weights and Biases has about 300. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Coralogix and Weights and Biases competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Coralogix and Weights and Biases compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Weights and Biases edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 80, but Coralogix (68) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Weights and Biases has a slight edge on paper, but Coralogix isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive