Skip to main content

Cropin vs Patsnap

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Patsnap is valued at $1B — more than 3x Cropin's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Patsnap leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Cropin

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Patsnap

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$1B
Total Funding
$110M
$300M
Awaira Score
70/100
80/100
Employees
200-500
500-1000
Founded
2010
2007
Stage
Series C
Series E
CropinPatsnap
Cropin logo
Cropin

🇮🇳 India · Krishna Kumar

Series CAI DataEst. 2010

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$110M

Awaira Score70/100

200-500 employees

Full Cropin Profile →
Winner
Patsnap logo
Patsnap

🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong

Series EAI DataEst. 2007

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$300M

Awaira Score80/100

500-1000 employees

Full Patsnap Profile →
Market Context

As AI Data players, Cropin and Patsnap target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Cropin at Series C vs Patsnap at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Cropin and Patsnap both operate in AI Data, though their strategies diverge significantly. Cropin is a digital agriculture and crop intelligence platform that collects, processes, and analyzes data from satellite imagery, weather systems, IoT sensors, and farm management records to generate AI-powered crop performance analytics and risk assessments for agribusinesses, food companies, governments, and financial institutions with agricultural exposure. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.

Funding & Valuation

Patsnap carries a disclosed valuation of $1B, while Cropin remains privately valued. Funding totals are closer: Patsnap at $300M compared to Cropin's $110M.

Growth Stage

Established in 2007, Patsnap has a modest 3-year head start over Cropin (2010). Stage-wise, Cropin is classified as Series C and Patsnap as Series E, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Team sizes also differ: Cropin employs 200-500 people versus Patsnap's 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇮🇳 India and 🇸🇬 Singapore respectively, Cropin and Patsnap tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. The Awaira Score gives Patsnap (80) a notable lead over Cropin (70). Cropin, led by Krishna Kumar, and Patsnap, led by Jeffrey Tiong, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Funding Velocity

Cropin

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$20M

Patsnap

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Funding History

Cropin has completed 1 funding round, while Patsnap has gone through 1. Cropin's most recent round was a Series C of $20M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). Cropin is at Series C while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Patsnap has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 3x the size of Cropin's 200-500. Patsnap has a 3-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Cropin's 2010. Geographically, they're in different markets — Cropin operates out of India and Patsnap from Singapore.

Metrics Comparison

MetricCropinPatsnap
💰Valuation
N/A
$1B
📈Total Funding
$110M
$300MWINS
📅Founded
2010WINS
2007
🚀Stage
Series C
Series E
👥Employees
200-500
500-1000
🌍Country
India
Singapore
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
70
80WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $190M more ($300M vs $110M)

📅

Market experience: Patsnap has 3 years more (founded 2007 vs 2010)

🚀

Growth stage: Cropin is at Series C vs Patsnap at Series E

👥

Team size: Cropin has 200-500 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇳 Cropin (India) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Patsnap scores 80/100 vs Cropin's 70/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Cropin logo

Choose Cropin if…

  • India-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Cropin is a digital agriculture and crop intelligence platform that collects, processes, and analyzes data from satellite imagery, weather systems, IoT sensors, and farm management records to generate AI-powered crop performance analytics and risk assessments for agribusinesses, food companies, governments, and financial institutions with agricultural exposure
Patsnap logo

Choose Patsnap if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 70/100
  • More established by valuation ($1B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
  • More market experience — founded in 2007
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents

Funding History

Cropin raised $110M across 1 round. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.

Cropin

Series C

Jan 2022

Lead: ABC World Asia

$20M

Patsnap

Series E

Sep 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Cropin

ABC World AsiaGoogleChiratae Ventures

Unique to Patsnap

SoftBank Vision Fund 2TencentSequoia Capital China

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Cropin vs Patsnap

Is Cropin bigger than Patsnap?
Patsnap has a disclosed valuation of $1B, while Cropin's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Patsnap employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Cropin or Patsnap?
Patsnap has raised more in total funding at $300M, compared to Cropin's $110M — a gap of $190M. Combined, the two companies have completed 2 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Patsnap leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while Cropin sits at 70/100. That 10-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Cropin vs Patsnap?
Cropin was founded by Krishna Kumar in 2010. Patsnap was founded by Jeffrey Tiong in 2007. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Cropin do vs Patsnap?
Cropin: Cropin is a digital agriculture and crop intelligence platform that collects, processes, and analyzes data from satellite imagery, weather systems, IoT sensors, and farm management records to generate AI-powered crop performance analytics and risk assessments for agribusinesses, food companies, governments, and financial institutions with agricultural exposure. The platform enables enterprise-level visibility into crop production, supply chain traceability, and climate risk across large farmer networks.\n\nThe company raised approximately $110M in funding from investors including Google, ABC World Asia, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and has built a platform covering tens of millions of acres of farmland across 60 countries. Cropin's satellite-based crop monitoring capabilities are used by multinational food companies to track sustainability commitments and supply chain traceability requirements.\n\nCropin occupies a unique position as a global agri-intelligence platform with deep roots in India and emerging market agriculture. The combination of Google investment and Gates Foundation support signals both commercial and development impact relevance, and the company's scale of farmland coverage creates a satellite and AI training data advantage that will be difficult for new entrants to replicate. Patsnap: Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. The Singapore company integrates patent data with scientific literature and chemical structure databases to provide a comprehensive IP and technology intelligence environment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $300 million including a Series E round from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Tencent, and CPE Yunji, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. Patsnap serves over 10,000 companies globally including R&D-intensive organisations in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and consumer electronics that use patent landscape analysis to inform technology strategy and investment decisions.\n\nPatsnap competes in the IP analytics market against Derwent Advancement (Clarivate), Questel Orbit, and Minesoft, as well as general enterprise search platforms that include patent data. Its AI capabilities for patent claim analysis, technology trend extraction, and cross-domain IP search differentiate it from traditional Boolean-search patent databases, enabling R&D strategy questions to be answered through AI-assisted analysis rather than manual patent review. The Singapore base provides access to both the Southeast Asian technology market and a sophisticated legal and financial services market for IP monetisation and licensing analytics.
Which company was founded first?
Patsnap got there first, launching in 2007 — that's 3 years of extra runway. Cropin didn't arrive until 2010. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Cropin has about 200-500 employees; Patsnap has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Cropin and Patsnap competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Cropin and Patsnap compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Patsnap edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 80, but Cropin (70) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Patsnap has a slight edge on paper, but Cropin isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive