Dataloop vs Weights and Biases
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Weights and Biases is valued at $1.3B — more than 3x Dataloop's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Dataloop
0 wins
Weights and Biases
3 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Eran Shlomo
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$49M
100-500 employees
🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$250M
300 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Dataloop in Israel and Weights and Biases in United States. Different stages (Series B vs Acquired) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Data, Dataloop and Weights and Biases rank among the most closely watched rivals. Dataloop builds an AI data management and annotation platform that covers the full data pipeline for computer vision and NLP model development, combining data labelling tools, annotation workflow management, quality assurance automation, and model training integration in a single platform. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development.
Funding & Valuation
Only Weights and Biases has a public valuation on record ($1.3B); Dataloop's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Weights and Biases has secured $250M, outpacing Dataloop's $49M by $201M.
Growth Stage
Founded the same year (2017), Dataloop and Weights and Biases have operated on parallel timelines. Growth stages differ: Dataloop (Series B) versus Weights and Biases (Acquired), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Headcount tells a story too: Dataloop has 100-500 employees and Weights and Biases has 300.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇮🇱 Israel and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Dataloop and Weights and Biases tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. A 25-point gap on the Awaira Score (Weights and Biases: 80, Dataloop: 55) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Under Eran Shlomo and Lukas Biewald respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Dataloop
Weights and Biases
Funding History
Dataloop has completed 3 funding rounds, while Weights and Biases has gone through 5. Dataloop's most recent round was a Series B of $34.3M, compared to Weights and Biases's Series C ($50M). Dataloop is at Series B while Weights and Biases is at Acquired — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Weights and Biases has the bigger team at roughly 300 people — 3x the size of Dataloop's 100-500. Both companies were founded in 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Dataloop operates out of Israel and Weights and Biases from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Dataloop | Weights and Biases |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1.3B |
📈Total Funding | $49M | $250MWINS |
📅Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
🚀Stage | Series B | Acquired |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 300 |
🌍Country | Israel | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 55 | 80WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Weights and Biases has raised $201M more ($250M vs $49M)
Growth stage: Dataloop is at Series B vs Weights and Biases at Acquired
Team size: Dataloop has 100-500 employees vs Weights and Biases's 300
Market base: 🇮🇱 Dataloop (Israel) vs 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Weights and Biases scores 80/100 vs Dataloop's 55/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Dataloop if…
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Dataloop builds an AI data management and annotation platform that covers the full data pipeline for computer vision and NLP model development, combining data labelling tools, annotation workflow management, quality assurance automation, and model training integration in a single platform
Choose Weights and Biases if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 55/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.3B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $250M
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Funding History
Dataloop raised $49M across 3 rounds. Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds.
Dataloop
Series B
Feb 2020
Series A
Oct 2018
Seed
Jun 2017
Weights and Biases
Series C
Aug 2023
Lead: Daniel Gross
Series C
Sep 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Mar 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Apr 2019
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2018
Lead: Google Ventures
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Weights and Biases
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Dataloop vs Weights and Biases
Is Dataloop bigger than Weights and Biases?▾
Which company raised more funding — Dataloop or Weights and Biases?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Dataloop vs Weights and Biases?▾
What does Dataloop do vs Weights and Biases?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Dataloop and Weights and Biases competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Weights and Biases has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs Dataloop's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Weights and Biases is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Dataloop has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.