Glean vs Celonis
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Celonis leads in funding with $2B, well ahead of Glean's $770M.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Glean
0 wins
Celonis
5 wins
🇺🇸 United States · Arvind Jain
Valuation
$7.2B
Total Funding
$770M
500 employees
🇩🇪 Germany · Alexander Rinke
Valuation
$13B
Total Funding
$2B
1000+ employees
As Enterprise AI players, Glean and Celonis target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Glean at Series F vs Celonis at Series D — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
The Enterprise AI sector features both Glean and Celonis as key players. Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data. Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow.
Neither company has a decisive valuation edge: Glean at $7.2B and Celonis at $13B. In aggregate funding, Celonis edges ahead at $2B versus Glean's $770M.
Celonis (est. 2011) predates Glean (est. 2019) by 8 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Glean is at Series F while Celonis stands at Series D, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, Glean reports 500 employees and Celonis reports 1000+.
Glean operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Celonis is based in 🇩🇪 Germany, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. The Awaira Score gives Celonis (90) a notable lead over Glean (82). Glean, led by Arvind Jain, and Celonis, led by Alexander Rinke, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Key Numbers
Funding Velocity
Glean
Celonis
Funding History
Glean has completed 5 funding rounds, while Celonis has gone through 3. Glean's most recent round was a Series E of $230M, compared to Celonis's Series D ($1B). Glean is at Series F while Celonis is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Glean has about 500 people and Celonis has around 1000+. Celonis has a 8-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Glean's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Glean operates out of United States and Celonis from Germany.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Glean | Celonis |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $7.2B | $13BWINS |
📈Total Funding | $770M | $2BWINS |
📅Founded | 2019WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Series F | Series D |
👥Employees | 500 | 1000+ |
🌍Country | United States | Germany |
🏷️Category | Enterprise AI | Enterprise AI |
⭐Awaira Score | 82 | 90WINS |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Celonis is valued 1.8x higher ($13B vs $7.2B)
Funding gap: Celonis has raised $1.2B more ($2B vs $770M)
Market experience: Celonis has 8 years more (founded 2011 vs 2019)
Growth stage: Glean is at Series F vs Celonis at Series D
Team size: Glean has 500 employees vs Celonis's 1000+
Market base: 🇺🇸 Glean (United States) vs 🇩🇪 Celonis (Germany)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment
Awaira Score: Celonis scores 90/100 vs Glean's 82/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Glean if…
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data
Choose Celonis if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 90/100 vs 82/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($13B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Germany-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow
Funding History
Glean raised $770M across 5 rounds. Celonis raised $2B across 3 rounds.
Glean
Series E
Jan 2024
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series D
Jan 2023
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series C
Jan 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Jan 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2020
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Celonis
Series D
Jun 2021
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series C
Nov 2020
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series B
Jun 2018
Lead: Accel
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Glean
Unique to Celonis
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Glean vs Celonis
Is Glean bigger than Celonis?▾
Which company raised more funding — Glean or Celonis?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Glean vs Celonis?▾
What does Glean do vs Celonis?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Glean and Celonis competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Celonis edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 90, but Glean (82) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Celonis has a slight edge on paper, but Glean isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.