Skip to main content
Overall Winner: Celonis·90/ 100
VS
Celonis logo
CelonisWinner

Glean vs Celonis

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Celonis leads in funding with $2B, well ahead of Glean's $770M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Celonis leads on 5 of 5 metrics

Glean

0 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Celonis

5 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience
Glean logo
Glean

🇺🇸 United States · Arvind Jain

Series FEnterprise AIEst. 2019

Valuation

$7.2B

Total Funding

$770M

Awaira Score82/100

500 employees

Full Glean Profile →
Winner
Celonis logo
Celonis

🇩🇪 Germany · Alexander Rinke

Series DEnterprise AIEst. 2011

Valuation

$13B

Total Funding

$2B

Awaira Score90/100

1000+ employees

Full Celonis Profile →
Market Context

As Enterprise AI players, Glean and Celonis target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Glean at Series F vs Celonis at Series D — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

The Enterprise AI sector features both Glean and Celonis as key players. Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data. Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow.

Neither company has a decisive valuation edge: Glean at $7.2B and Celonis at $13B. In aggregate funding, Celonis edges ahead at $2B versus Glean's $770M.

Celonis (est. 2011) predates Glean (est. 2019) by 8 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Glean is at Series F while Celonis stands at Series D, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, Glean reports 500 employees and Celonis reports 1000+.

Glean operates out of 🇺🇸 United States while Celonis is based in 🇩🇪 Germany, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. The Awaira Score gives Celonis (90) a notable lead over Glean (82). Glean, led by Arvind Jain, and Celonis, led by Alexander Rinke, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$7.2B
$13B
Total Funding
$770M
$2B
Awaira Score
82/100
90/100
Employees
500
1000+
Founded
2019
2011
Stage
Series F
Series D
GleanCelonis

Funding Velocity

Glean

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$120M
Funding Span4 yrs

Celonis

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$446.7M
Funding Span2.9 yrs

Funding History

Glean has completed 5 funding rounds, while Celonis has gone through 3. Glean's most recent round was a Series E of $230M, compared to Celonis's Series D ($1B). Glean is at Series F while Celonis is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Glean has about 500 people and Celonis has around 1000+. Celonis has a 8-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Glean's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Glean operates out of United States and Celonis from Germany.

Metrics Comparison

MetricGleanCelonis
💰Valuation
$7.2B
$13BWINS
📈Total Funding
$770M
$2BWINS
📅Founded
2019WINS
2011
🚀Stage
Series F
Series D
👥Employees
500
1000+
🌍Country
United States
Germany
🏷️Category
Enterprise AI
Enterprise AI
Awaira Score
82
90WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Celonis is valued 1.8x higher ($13B vs $7.2B)

📈

Funding gap: Celonis has raised $1.2B more ($2B vs $770M)

📅

Market experience: Celonis has 8 years more (founded 2011 vs 2019)

🚀

Growth stage: Glean is at Series F vs Celonis at Series D

👥

Team size: Glean has 500 employees vs Celonis's 1000+

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Glean (United States) vs 🇩🇪 Celonis (Germany)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment

Awaira Score: Celonis scores 90/100 vs Glean's 82/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Glean logo

Choose Glean if…

  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data
Celonis logo

Choose Celonis if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 90/100 vs 82/100
  • More established by valuation ($13B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Germany-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow

Funding History

Glean raised $770M across 5 rounds. Celonis raised $2B across 3 rounds.

Glean

Series E

Jan 2024

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$230M

Series D

Jan 2023

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$200M

Series C

Jan 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$100M

Series B

Jan 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$40M

Series A

Jan 2020

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$30M

Celonis

Series D

Jun 2021

Lead: Arena Holdings

$1B

Series C

Nov 2020

Lead: Arena Holdings

$290M

Series B

Jun 2018

Lead: Accel

$50M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Glean

Sequoia CapitalSalesforce VenturesKleiner Perkins

Unique to Celonis

Arena HoldingsDurable Capital PartnersT. Rowe PriceFranklin TempletonAccel83North

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Glean vs Celonis

Is Glean bigger than Celonis?
By valuation, Celonis is the larger company at $13B versus $7.2B — a 1.8x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Glean employs 500 people while Celonis has 1000+ employees.
Which company raised more funding — Glean or Celonis?
Celonis has raised more in total funding at $2B, compared to Glean's $770M — a gap of $1.2B. Combined, the two companies have completed 8 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Celonis leads with an Awaira Score of 90/100, while Glean sits at 82/100. That 8-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Glean vs Celonis?
Glean was founded by Arvind Jain in 2019. Celonis was founded by Alexander Rinke in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Glean do vs Celonis?
Glean: Glean is an enterprise AI search and discovery platform founded in 2019 that helps organizations extract actionable insights from internal data. The company operates in the enterprise AI category, providing AI-powered search capabilities across fragmented corporate information systems including documents, emails, chat messages, and databases. Glean's core technology uses machine learning to understand context and intent, enabling employees to find relevant information and answers across previously disconnected data sources. The platform serves large enterprises seeking to improve productivity and knowledge accessibility. Glean competes in the growing enterprise search and generative AI market alongside companies like Perplexity and traditional search providers adapting to AI. The company has raised $600 million across multiple funding rounds, reaching a valuation of $4.6 billion as of its Series E stage. This funding positions Glean among well-capitalized AI startups addressing enterprise information retrieval challenges. The company targets mid-to-large organizations where data silos and information discovery present operational inefficiencies. Glean's growth trajectory reflects broader enterprise adoption of AI-powered search solutions as organizations increasingly prioritize knowledge worker productivity and unified information access across their technology stacks. Glean specializes in enterprise-specific AI search that unifies fragmented internal data sources rather than external web indexing. Glean operates in the Enterprise AI sector and is headquartered in United States. Founded in 2019 by Arvind Jain, Glean has raised $770M in total funding, achieving a valuation of $7.2B as of its latest round. The company's funding journey includes a Series A of $30M in 2020, a Series B of $40M in 2021, a Series C of $100M in 2022, a Series D of $200M in 2023, a Series E of $230M in 2024. The most recent round was led by Sequoia Capital. With approximately 500 employees, Glean has established itself as a Series F-stage player in the Enterprise AI market. The company holds an Awaira Score of 82/100, reflecting its strong position across valuation, funding trajectory, team scale, and market influence. Glean competes in a rapidly evolving segment alongside other Enterprise AI companies. Based in United States, Glean is part of a growing international AI ecosystem attracting talent and investment. The Enterprise AI space has attracted significant investment in recent years, with companies racing to capture enterprise and consumer demand for AI-powered solutions. Celonis: Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow. The Munich company platform connects to enterprise software transaction records, reconstructs actual business process flows from data, identifies inefficiencies and compliance deviations, and provides AI-powered recommendations for process improvement.\n\nThe company raised approximately $1.4 billion including a $1 billion Series D round in 2021 from investors including Arena Holdings, Durable Capital, and T. Rowe Price, valuing it at $13 billion and making it one of Germany most valuable private technology companies. Celonis counts over 1,000 enterprise clients including Siemens, Uber, 3M, and Vodafone, with large deployments across order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, and accounts payable processes generating measurable working capital improvements and operational cost reductions.\n\nCelonis created the process mining software category and competes against SAP Signavio, IBM Process Mining, and Minit in a market it largely invented. The company has expanded from analytical process mining tools into execution management, embedding AI recommendations directly into enterprise workflows rather than producing reports for human review. This execution layer differentiates Celonis from pure analytics vendors and creates a stickier product that becomes embedded in operational processes rather than consumed as a standalone analysis tool.
Which company was founded first?
Celonis got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 8 years of extra runway. Glean didn't arrive until 2019. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Glean has about 500 employees; Celonis has about 1000+. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Glean and Celonis competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Glean and Celonis compete in Enterprise AI, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Celonis edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 90, but Glean (82) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Celonis has a slight edge on paper, but Glean isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive