Skip to main content

Harrison.ai vs Butterfly Network

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Butterfly Network is valued at $957M — more than 3x Harrison.ai's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Butterfly Network leads on 4 of 4 metrics

Harrison.ai

0 wins

-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Butterfly Network

4 wins

+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$957M
Total Funding
$129M
$370M
Awaira Score
68/100
85/100
Employees
100-500
500-1000
Founded
2018
2011
Stage
Series C
Public
Harrison.aiButterfly Network
Harrison.ai logo
Harrison.ai

🇦🇺 Australia · Aengus Tran

Series CAI HealthcareEst. 2018

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$129M

Awaira Score68/100

100-500 employees

Full Harrison.ai Profile →
Winner
Butterfly Network logo
Butterfly Network

🇺🇸 United States · John Martin

PublicAI HealthcareEst. 2011

Valuation

$957M

Total Funding

$370M

Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Butterfly Network Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Healthcare space, though from different geographies — Harrison.ai in Australia and Butterfly Network in United States. Different stages (Series C vs Public) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

In the AI Healthcare market, Harrison.ai and Butterfly Network represent two distinct approaches. Harrison. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging.

Funding & Valuation

Only Butterfly Network has a public valuation on record ($957M); Harrison.ai's has not been disclosed. Harrison.ai has raised $129M while Butterfly Network has raised $370M, keeping their war chests in the same ballpark.

Growth Stage

Butterfly Network (est. 2011) predates Harrison.ai (est. 2018) by 7 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Growth stages differ: Harrison.ai (Series C) versus Butterfly Network (Public), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. On headcount, Harrison.ai reports 100-500 employees and Butterfly Network reports 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇦🇺 Australia and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Harrison.ai and Butterfly Network tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. A 17-point gap on the Awaira Score (Butterfly Network: 85, Harrison.ai: 68) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Under Aengus Tran and John Martin respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Harrison.ai

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$112M

Butterfly Network

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$74M
Funding Span5.3 yrs

Funding History

Harrison.ai has completed 1 funding round, while Butterfly Network has gone through 5. Harrison.ai's most recent round was a Series C of $112M, compared to Butterfly Network's Series D ($148M). Harrison.ai is at Series C while Butterfly Network is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Butterfly Network has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 5x the size of Harrison.ai's 100-500. Butterfly Network has a 7-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Harrison.ai's 2018. Geographically, they're in different markets — Harrison.ai operates out of Australia and Butterfly Network from United States.

Metrics Comparison

MetricHarrison.aiButterfly Network
💰Valuation
N/A
$957M
📈Total Funding
$129M
$370MWINS
📅Founded
2018WINS
2011
🚀Stage
Series C
Public
👥Employees
100-500
500-1000
🌍Country
Australia
United States
🏷️Category
AI Healthcare
AI Healthcare
Awaira Score
68
85WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $241M more ($370M vs $129M)

📅

Market experience: Butterfly Network has 7 years more (founded 2011 vs 2018)

🚀

Growth stage: Harrison.ai is at Series C vs Butterfly Network at Public

👥

Team size: Harrison.ai has 100-500 employees vs Butterfly Network's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇦🇺 Harrison.ai (Australia) vs 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment

Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Harrison.ai's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Harrison.ai logo

Choose Harrison.ai if…

  • Australia-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Harrison
Butterfly Network logo

Choose Butterfly Network if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 68/100
  • More established by valuation ($957M)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $370M
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging

Funding History

Harrison.ai raised $129M across 1 round. Butterfly Network raised $370M across 5 rounds.

Harrison.ai

Series C

Feb 2025

Lead: HESTA

$112M

Butterfly Network

Series D

Oct 2016

$148M

Series C

Jun 2015

$114.7M

Series B

Feb 2014

$66.6M

Series A

Oct 2012

$29.6M

Seed

Jun 2011

$11.1M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Harrison.ai

HESTABlackbird VenturesSkip Capital

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Harrison.ai vs Butterfly Network

Is Harrison.ai bigger than Butterfly Network?
Butterfly Network has a disclosed valuation of $957M, while Harrison.ai's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Butterfly Network employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Harrison.ai or Butterfly Network?
Butterfly Network has raised more in total funding at $370M, compared to Harrison.ai's $129M — a gap of $241M. Combined, the two companies have completed 6 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Butterfly Network leads with an Awaira Score of 85/100, while Harrison.ai sits at 68/100. That 17-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Harrison.ai vs Butterfly Network?
Harrison.ai was founded by Aengus Tran in 2018. Butterfly Network was founded by John Martin in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Harrison.ai do vs Butterfly Network?
Harrison.ai: Harrison.ai develops AI radiology and pathology analysis software for clinical deployment, building FDA-cleared and TGA-registered algorithms for chest X-ray abnormality detection, CT pulmonary angiography analysis, and mammography screening under its Annalise.ai product brand. The Sydney company focuses on AI clinical decision support that helps radiologists prioritise worklists, detect abnormalities, and reduce reporting errors in high-volume radiology departments.\n\nThe company raised approximately $129 million including a Series C from investors including Blackbird Ventures, Skip Capital, and Telstra Ventures. Harrison.ai has deployed its Annalise.ai platform across Australian hospital networks and has received US FDA clearance for its chest X-ray AI product, enabling international commercial expansion beyond Australia. The company has published clinical validation studies demonstrating AI performance that is non-inferior to specialist radiologist reads on chest X-ray abnormality detection across multiple institutions.\n\nHarrison.ai competes in the AI radiology market against Aidoc, Lunit, Qure.ai, and Behold.ai, which all target radiologist workflow assistance and clinical alerting. The Australian healthcare market provides a strong home base given the National Health Service framework and centrally coordinated radiology procurement, while FDA clearance opens the substantially larger US radiology AI market. The company is considered one of Australia most promising medical AI companies and a flagship for the Australian healthcare technology ecosystem. Butterfly Network: Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging. The AI software layer provides real-time image interpretation guidance, enabling clinicians with limited ultrasound training to perform diagnostic scans at the bedside.\n\nThe company is publicly traded on the NYSE under the ticker BFLY and raised over 700 million USD prior to and through its public listing. Butterfly has deployed devices across hospitals, emergency rooms, and point-of-care settings in over 50 countries, with particular penetration in resource-limited healthcare settings where traditional ultrasound equipment is prohibitively expensive or unavailable.\n\nPortable AI-assisted diagnostic imaging represents a structural shift in how and where medical imaging is performed. Butterfly Network has created a defensible position through its proprietary chip architecture, which competitors cannot easily replicate, and through its growing library of AI-assisted clinical guidance tools. The transition from hospital-based imaging to point-of-care diagnostics powered by AI guidance is a multi-decade trend that positions Butterfly at the center of a fundamental change in diagnostic medicine. Butterfly Network operates in the AI Healthcare sector and is headquartered in United States. Founded in 2011 by John Martin, Butterfly Network has raised $370M in total funding, achieving a valuation of $957M as of its latest round. The company's funding journey includes a Seed of $11.1M in 2011, a Series A of $29.6M in 2012, a Series B of $66.6M in 2014, a Series C of $114.7M in 2015, a Series D of $148M in 2016. With approximately 500-1000 employees, Butterfly Network has established itself as a Public-stage player in the AI Healthcare market. The company holds an Awaira Score of 85/100, reflecting its strong position across valuation, funding trajectory, team scale, and market influence. Butterfly Network competes in a rapidly evolving segment alongside other AI Healthcare companies. Based in United States, Butterfly Network is part of a growing international AI ecosystem attracting talent and investment. The AI Healthcare space has attracted significant investment in recent years, with companies racing to capture enterprise and consumer demand for AI-powered solutions.
Which company was founded first?
Butterfly Network got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 7 years of extra runway. Harrison.ai didn't arrive until 2018. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Harrison.ai has about 100-500 employees; Butterfly Network has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Harrison.ai and Butterfly Network competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Harrison.ai and Butterfly Network compete in AI Healthcare, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Butterfly Network has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 85 vs Harrison.ai's 68. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Butterfly Network is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Harrison.ai has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive