Skip to main content

Helsing vs Celonis

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Neck and neck — Helsing ($12B) and Celonis ($13B) are valued within 20% of each other.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Celonis leads on 5 of 5 metrics

Helsing

0 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Celonis

5 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$12B
$13B
Total Funding
$1.6B
$2B
Awaira Score
68/100
90/100
Employees
100-500
1000+
Founded
2021
2011
Stage
Series D
Series D
HelsingCelonis
Helsing logo
Helsing

🇩🇪 Germany · Gundbert Scherf

Series DEnterprise AIEst. 2021

Valuation

$12B

Total Funding

$1.6B

Awaira Score68/100

100-500 employees

Full Helsing Profile →
Winner
Celonis logo
Celonis

🇩🇪 Germany · Alexander Rinke

Series DEnterprise AIEst. 2011

Valuation

$13B

Total Funding

$2B

Awaira Score90/100

1000+ employees

Full Celonis Profile →
Market Context

This is a head-to-head contest: both operate in Enterprise AI and share a home market in Germany. Both are at the Series D stage, meaning they face similar scaling challenges and investor expectations.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within Enterprise AI, Helsing and Celonis rank among the most closely watched rivals. Helsing develops AI software for defence and intelligence applications, building real-time signal processing and sensor fusion systems that enhance situational awareness for military operators across air, land, and electronic warfare domains. Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow.

Funding & Valuation

The two trade at comparable valuations — Celonis at $13B versus Helsing at $12B. Helsing has raised $1.6B while Celonis has raised $2B, keeping their war chests in the same ballpark.

Growth Stage

Celonis (est. 2011) predates Helsing (est. 2021) by 10 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Each company has reached the Series D stage, placing them at comparable points in their growth trajectories. Headcount tells a story too: Helsing has 100-500 employees and Celonis has 1000+.

Geography & Outlook

Both companies are headquartered in 🇩🇪 Germany, competing for the same regional talent pool and customer base. Celonis scores 90 on Awaira's composite index versus Helsing's 68, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Gundbert Scherf and Alexander Rinke respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Helsing

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$209M

Celonis

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$446.7M
Funding Span2.9 yrs

Funding History

Helsing has completed 1 funding round, while Celonis has gone through 3. Helsing's most recent round was a Series B of $209M, compared to Celonis's Series D ($1B). Both are currently at the Series D stage.

Team & Scale

Celonis has the bigger team at roughly 1000+ people — 10x the size of Helsing's 100-500. Celonis has a 10-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Helsing's 2021. Both are based in Germany.

Metrics Comparison

MetricHelsingCelonis
💰Valuation
$12B
$13BWINS
📈Total Funding
$1.6B
$2BWINS
📅Founded
2021WINS
2011
🚀Stage
Series D
Series D
👥Employees
100-500
1000+
🌍Country
Germany
Germany
🏷️Category
Enterprise AI
Enterprise AI
Awaira Score
68
90WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Celonis is valued 1.1x higher ($13B vs $12B)

📈

Funding gap: Celonis has raised $420M more ($2B vs $1.6B)

📅

Market experience: Celonis has 10 years more (founded 2011 vs 2021)

👥

Team size: Helsing has 100-500 employees vs Celonis's 1000+

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment

Awaira Score: Celonis scores 90/100 vs Helsing's 68/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Helsing logo

Choose Helsing if…

  • Helsing develops AI software for defence and intelligence applications, building real-time signal processing and sensor fusion systems that enhance situational awareness for military operators across air, land, and electronic warfare domains
Celonis logo

Choose Celonis if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 90/100 vs 68/100
  • More established by valuation ($13B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
  • More market experience — founded in 2011
  • Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow

Funding History

Helsing raised $1.6B across 1 round. Celonis raised $2B across 3 rounds.

Helsing

Series B

Sep 2023

Lead: General Catalyst

$209M

Celonis

Series D

Jun 2021

Lead: Arena Holdings

$1B

Series C

Nov 2020

Lead: Arena Holdings

$290M

Series B

Jun 2018

Lead: Accel

$50M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Helsing

General CatalystSpotify foundersDaniel Ek

Unique to Celonis

Arena HoldingsDurable Capital PartnersT. Rowe PriceFranklin TempletonAccel83North

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Helsing vs Celonis

Is Helsing bigger than Celonis?
By valuation, Celonis is the larger company at $13B versus $12B — a 1.1x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Helsing employs 100-500 people while Celonis has 1000+ employees.
Which company raised more funding — Helsing or Celonis?
Celonis has raised more in total funding at $2B, compared to Helsing's $1.6B — a gap of $420M. Combined, the two companies have completed 4 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Celonis leads with an Awaira Score of 90/100, while Helsing sits at 68/100. That 22-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Helsing vs Celonis?
Helsing was founded by Gundbert Scherf in 2021. Celonis was founded by Alexander Rinke in 2011. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Helsing do vs Celonis?
Helsing: Helsing develops AI software for defence and intelligence applications, building real-time signal processing and sensor fusion systems that enhance situational awareness for military operators across air, land, and electronic warfare domains. The Munich and London company applies deep learning to radar, sonar, and other sensor data streams to identify threats, classify targets, and support human decision-making in time-critical operational environments. Helsing has secured contracts with the German Bundeswehr and other NATO member defence ministries, providing AI-enhanced signal processing modules that integrate with existing military sensor infrastructure. The company has attracted substantial funding from investors including General Catalyst, Accel, Lightspeed Ventures, and Prima Materia (Spotify co-founder Daniel Ek's firm), making it one of the most well-funded European defence technology companies. Helsing operates in the European defence AI market, which has expanded rapidly following the Russian invasion of Ukraine as NATO governments accelerated defence modernisation spending and AI integration into military systems. The company competes with Palantir, Anduril, and Shield AI in the broader defence AI space while occupying a specifically European market position that addresses sovereignty concerns about deploying US-based AI systems in sensitive military applications. Helsing's explicitly European identity and compliance with EU data handling requirements give it access to defence contracts where non-European vendors face security vetting barriers. Celonis: Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow. The Munich company platform connects to enterprise software transaction records, reconstructs actual business process flows from data, identifies inefficiencies and compliance deviations, and provides AI-powered recommendations for process improvement.\n\nThe company raised approximately $1.4 billion including a $1 billion Series D round in 2021 from investors including Arena Holdings, Durable Capital, and T. Rowe Price, valuing it at $13 billion and making it one of Germany most valuable private technology companies. Celonis counts over 1,000 enterprise clients including Siemens, Uber, 3M, and Vodafone, with large deployments across order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, and accounts payable processes generating measurable working capital improvements and operational cost reductions.\n\nCelonis created the process mining software category and competes against SAP Signavio, IBM Process Mining, and Minit in a market it largely invented. The company has expanded from analytical process mining tools into execution management, embedding AI recommendations directly into enterprise workflows rather than producing reports for human review. This execution layer differentiates Celonis from pure analytics vendors and creates a stickier product that becomes embedded in operational processes rather than consumed as a standalone analysis tool.
Which company was founded first?
Celonis got there first, launching in 2011 — that's 10 years of extra runway. Helsing didn't arrive until 2021. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Helsing has about 100-500 employees; Celonis has about 1000+. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Helsing and Celonis competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Helsing and Celonis compete in Enterprise AI, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Celonis has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 90 vs Helsing's 68. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.

Who Should You Watch?

Celonis is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Helsing has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive