Hivery vs Celonis
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Celonis is valued at $13B — more than 3x Hivery's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Hivery
0 wins
Celonis
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇦🇺 Australia · Jason Hosking
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$35M
100-500 employees
🇩🇪 Germany · Alexander Rinke
Valuation
$13B
Total Funding
$2B
1000+ employees
As Enterprise AI players, Hivery and Celonis target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Hivery at Series C vs Celonis at Series D — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Enterprise AI remains a contested market, with Hivery and Celonis among its most prominent entrants. Hivery builds AI retail category management and space optimisation software that uses machine learning to recommend which products to stock, in what quantities, and in which planogram positions to maximise sales and profitability at the individual store level across retail networks. Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow.
Funding & Valuation
Celonis carries a disclosed valuation of $13B, while Hivery remains privately valued. Capital raised tells a clear story: Celonis at $2B versus Hivery at $35M — a $2B difference.
Growth Stage
Celonis was founded in 2011, 4 years before Hivery arrived in 2015. Hivery is at Series C while Celonis stands at Series D, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, Hivery reports 100-500 employees and Celonis reports 1000+.
Geography & Outlook
Hivery operates out of 🇦🇺 Australia while Celonis is based in 🇩🇪 Germany, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Celonis scores 90 on Awaira's composite index versus Hivery's 55, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Hivery, led by Jason Hosking, and Celonis, led by Alexander Rinke, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
Hivery
Celonis
Funding History
Hivery has completed 4 funding rounds, while Celonis has gone through 3. Hivery's most recent round was a Series C of $19.3M, compared to Celonis's Series D ($1B). Hivery is at Series C while Celonis is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Celonis has the bigger team at roughly 1000+ people — 10x the size of Hivery's 100-500. Celonis has a 4-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Hivery's 2015. Geographically, they're in different markets — Hivery operates out of Australia and Celonis from Germany.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Hivery | Celonis |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $13B |
📈Total Funding | $35M | $2BWINS |
📅Founded | 2015WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Series C | Series D |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1000+ |
🌍Country | Australia | Germany |
🏷️Category | Enterprise AI | Enterprise AI |
⭐Awaira Score | 55 | 90WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Celonis has raised $2B more ($2B vs $35M)
Market experience: Celonis has 4 years more (founded 2011 vs 2015)
Growth stage: Hivery is at Series C vs Celonis at Series D
Team size: Hivery has 100-500 employees vs Celonis's 1000+
Market base: 🇦🇺 Hivery (Australia) vs 🇩🇪 Celonis (Germany)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment
Awaira Score: Celonis scores 90/100 vs Hivery's 55/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Hivery if…
- ✓Australia-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Hivery builds AI retail category management and space optimisation software that uses machine learning to recommend which products to stock, in what quantities, and in which planogram positions to maximise sales and profitability at the individual store level across retail networks
Choose Celonis if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 90/100 vs 55/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($13B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Germany-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow
Funding History
Hivery raised $35M across 4 rounds. Celonis raised $2B across 3 rounds.
Hivery
Series C
Jun 2019
Series B
Feb 2018
Series A
Oct 2016
Seed
Jun 2015
Celonis
Series D
Jun 2021
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series C
Nov 2020
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series B
Jun 2018
Lead: Accel
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Celonis
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Hivery vs Celonis
Is Hivery bigger than Celonis?▾
Which company raised more funding — Hivery or Celonis?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Hivery vs Celonis?▾
What does Hivery do vs Celonis?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Hivery and Celonis competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Celonis has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 90 vs Hivery's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Celonis is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Hivery has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.