iMerit vs Patsnap
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Patsnap is valued at $1B — more than 3x iMerit's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
iMerit
1 win
Patsnap
3 wins
🇮🇳 India · Radha Basu
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$24.3M
5000 employees
🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$300M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — iMerit in India and Patsnap in Singapore. Different stages (Series B vs Series E) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
In the AI Data market, iMerit and Patsnap represent two distinct approaches. iMerit is an India-based data AI company founded in 2012 that specializes in providing high-quality training data for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.
Only Patsnap has a public valuation on record ($1B); iMerit's has not been disclosed. On the funding front, Patsnap has secured $300M, outpacing iMerit's $24.3M by $275.7M.
With a 5-year head start, Patsnap (founded 2007) has had considerably more time to mature than iMerit (2012). iMerit is at Series B while Patsnap stands at Series E, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. On headcount, iMerit reports 5000 employees and Patsnap reports 500-1000.
iMerit operates out of 🇮🇳 India while Patsnap is based in 🇸🇬 Singapore, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Patsnap scores 80 on Awaira's composite index versus iMerit's 55, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. Under Radha Basu and Jeffrey Tiong respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Key Numbers
Funding Velocity
iMerit
Patsnap
Funding History
iMerit has completed 3 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. iMerit's most recent round was a Series B of $17M, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). iMerit is at Series B while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
iMerit is significantly larger with about 5000 employees, compared to Patsnap's 500-1000. That's a 10x difference in headcount. Patsnap has a 5-year head start, founded in 2007 vs iMerit's 2012. Geographically, they're in different markets — iMerit operates out of India and Patsnap from Singapore.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | iMerit | Patsnap |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1B |
📈Total Funding | $24.3M | $300MWINS |
📅Founded | 2012WINS | 2007 |
🚀Stage | Series B | Series E |
👥Employees | 5000 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | India | Singapore |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 55 | 80WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $275.7M more ($300M vs $24.3M)
Market experience: Patsnap has 5 years more (founded 2007 vs 2012)
Growth stage: iMerit is at Series B vs Patsnap at Series E
Team size: iMerit has 5000 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000
Market base: 🇮🇳 iMerit (India) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Patsnap scores 80/100 vs iMerit's 55/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose iMerit if…
- ✓India-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓iMerit is an India-based data AI company founded in 2012 that specializes in providing high-quality training data for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications
Choose Patsnap if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 55/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents
Funding History
iMerit raised $24.3M across 3 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.
iMerit
Series B
Feb 2015
Series A
Oct 2013
Seed
Jun 2012
Patsnap
Series E
Sep 2021
Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Patsnap
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — iMerit vs Patsnap
Is iMerit bigger than Patsnap?▾
Which company raised more funding — iMerit or Patsnap?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded iMerit vs Patsnap?▾
What does iMerit do vs Patsnap?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are iMerit and Patsnap competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Patsnap has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs iMerit's 55. The difference comes down to funding depth and strategic focus.
Who Should You Watch?
Patsnap is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But iMerit has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.