InstaDeep vs Celonis
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Celonis is valued at $13B — more than 3x InstaDeep's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
InstaDeep
0 wins
Celonis
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Karim Beguir
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$100M
100-500 employees
🇩🇪 Germany · Alexander Rinke
Valuation
$13B
Total Funding
$2B
1000+ employees
As Enterprise AI players, InstaDeep and Celonis target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — InstaDeep at Acquired vs Celonis at Series D — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
InstaDeep and Celonis both operate in Enterprise AI, though their strategies diverge significantly. InstaDeep built AI decision-making systems for complex industrial and enterprise applications, combining deep reinforcement learning, graph neural networks, and large-scale optimisation techniques to address routing, scheduling, and resource allocation problems across logistics, life sciences, and infrastructure sectors. Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow.
Funding & Valuation
Celonis carries a disclosed valuation of $13B, while InstaDeep remains privately valued. With $2B raised, Celonis has attracted substantially more capital than InstaDeep ($100M).
Growth Stage
Established in 2011, Celonis has a modest 3-year head start over InstaDeep (2014). Growth stages differ: InstaDeep (Acquired) versus Celonis (Series D), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: InstaDeep employs 100-500 people versus Celonis's 1000+.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇬🇧 United Kingdom and 🇩🇪 Germany respectively, InstaDeep and Celonis tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. Celonis scores 90 on Awaira's composite index versus InstaDeep's 58, a wide margin reflecting substantially stronger fundamentals. InstaDeep, led by Karim Beguir, and Celonis, led by Alexander Rinke, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
InstaDeep
Celonis
Funding History
InstaDeep has completed 5 funding rounds, while Celonis has gone through 3. InstaDeep's most recent round was a Series D of $40M, compared to Celonis's Series D ($1B). InstaDeep is at Acquired while Celonis is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Celonis has the bigger team at roughly 1000+ people — 10x the size of InstaDeep's 100-500. Celonis has a 3-year head start, founded in 2011 vs InstaDeep's 2014. Geographically, they're in different markets — InstaDeep operates out of United Kingdom and Celonis from Germany.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | InstaDeep | Celonis |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $13B |
📈Total Funding | $100M | $2BWINS |
📅Founded | 2014WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Acquired | Series D |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 1000+ |
🌍Country | United Kingdom | Germany |
🏷️Category | Enterprise AI | Enterprise AI |
⭐Awaira Score | 58 | 90WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Celonis has raised $1.9B more ($2B vs $100M)
Market experience: Celonis has 3 years more (founded 2011 vs 2014)
Growth stage: InstaDeep is at Acquired vs Celonis at Series D
Team size: InstaDeep has 100-500 employees vs Celonis's 1000+
Market base: 🇬🇧 InstaDeep (United Kingdom) vs 🇩🇪 Celonis (Germany)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Enterprise AI market segment
Awaira Score: Celonis scores 90/100 vs InstaDeep's 58/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose InstaDeep if…
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓InstaDeep built AI decision-making systems for complex industrial and enterprise applications, combining deep reinforcement learning, graph neural networks, and large-scale optimisation techniques to address routing, scheduling, and resource allocation problems across logistics, life sciences, and infrastructure sectors
Choose Celonis if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 90/100 vs 58/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($13B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $2B
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓Germany-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Celonis builds a process mining and execution management platform that uses machine learning to extract, visualise, and optimise business processes from event log data in enterprise systems including SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow
Funding History
InstaDeep raised $100M across 5 rounds. Celonis raised $2B across 3 rounds.
InstaDeep
Series D
Oct 2019
Series C
Jun 2018
Series B
Feb 2017
Series A
Oct 2015
Seed
Jun 2014
Celonis
Series D
Jun 2021
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series C
Nov 2020
Lead: Arena Holdings
Series B
Jun 2018
Lead: Accel
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Celonis
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — InstaDeep vs Celonis
Is InstaDeep bigger than Celonis?▾
Which company raised more funding — InstaDeep or Celonis?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded InstaDeep vs Celonis?▾
What does InstaDeep do vs Celonis?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are InstaDeep and Celonis competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Celonis has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 90 vs InstaDeep's 58. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Celonis is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But InstaDeep has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.