Kepler Vision vs Butterfly Network
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Butterfly Network is valued at $957M — more than 3x Kepler Vision's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Kepler Vision
0 wins
Butterfly Network
4 wins
Key Numbers
🇳🇱 Netherlands · Harro Stokman
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$3M
1-50 employees
🇺🇸 United States · John Martin
Valuation
$957M
Total Funding
$370M
500-1000 employees
As AI Healthcare players, Kepler Vision and Butterfly Network target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Kepler Vision at Seed vs Butterfly Network at Public — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Kepler Vision and Butterfly Network both operate in AI Healthcare, though their strategies diverge significantly. Kepler Vision Technologies develops AI fall detection and activity recognition software for elderly care environments, using computer vision models that process video from ceiling-mounted cameras in care facilities to detect falls, assess resident activity patterns, and alert care staff to incidents requiring immediate response. Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging.
Funding & Valuation
Butterfly Network carries a disclosed valuation of $957M, while Kepler Vision remains privately valued. Capital raised tells a clear story: Butterfly Network at $370M versus Kepler Vision at $3M — a $367M difference.
Growth Stage
Kepler Vision is the younger company by 6 years, having launched in 2017 compared to Butterfly Network's 2011 founding. Stage-wise, Kepler Vision is classified as Seed and Butterfly Network as Public, reflecting divergent fundraising histories. Team sizes also differ: Kepler Vision employs 1-50 people versus Butterfly Network's 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇳🇱 Netherlands and 🇺🇸 United States respectively, Kepler Vision and Butterfly Network tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. A 55-point gap on the Awaira Score (Butterfly Network: 85, Kepler Vision: 30) signals a clear difference in overall company strength. Kepler Vision, led by Harro Stokman, and Butterfly Network, led by John Martin, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
Kepler Vision
Butterfly Network
Funding History
Kepler Vision has completed 1 funding round, while Butterfly Network has gone through 5. Kepler Vision's most recent round was a Seed of $3M, compared to Butterfly Network's Series D ($148M). Kepler Vision is at Seed while Butterfly Network is at Public — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Butterfly Network has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 500x the size of Kepler Vision's 1-50. Butterfly Network has a 6-year head start, founded in 2011 vs Kepler Vision's 2017. Geographically, they're in different markets — Kepler Vision operates out of Netherlands and Butterfly Network from United States.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Kepler Vision | Butterfly Network |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $957M |
📈Total Funding | $3M | $370MWINS |
📅Founded | 2017WINS | 2011 |
🚀Stage | Seed | Public |
👥Employees | 1-50 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | Netherlands | United States |
🏷️Category | AI Healthcare | AI Healthcare |
⭐Awaira Score | 30 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Butterfly Network has raised $367M more ($370M vs $3M)
Market experience: Butterfly Network has 6 years more (founded 2011 vs 2017)
Growth stage: Kepler Vision is at Seed vs Butterfly Network at Public
Team size: Kepler Vision has 1-50 employees vs Butterfly Network's 500-1000
Market base: 🇳🇱 Kepler Vision (Netherlands) vs 🇺🇸 Butterfly Network (United States)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Healthcare market segment
Awaira Score: Butterfly Network scores 85/100 vs Kepler Vision's 30/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Kepler Vision if…
- ✓Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Kepler Vision Technologies develops AI fall detection and activity recognition software for elderly care environments, using computer vision models that process video from ceiling-mounted cameras in care facilities to detect falls, assess resident activity patterns, and alert care staff to incidents requiring immediate response
Choose Butterfly Network if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 30/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($957M)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $370M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2011
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Butterfly Network produces the Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device powered by a proprietary semiconductor chip that replaces traditional piezoelectric transducer arrays with a single silicon chip capable of whole-body imaging
Funding History
Kepler Vision raised $3M across 1 round. Butterfly Network raised $370M across 5 rounds.
Kepler Vision
Seed
Jun 2017
Butterfly Network
Series D
Oct 2016
Series C
Jun 2015
Series B
Feb 2014
Series A
Oct 2012
Seed
Jun 2011
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Kepler Vision vs Butterfly Network
Is Kepler Vision bigger than Butterfly Network?▾
Which company raised more funding — Kepler Vision or Butterfly Network?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Kepler Vision vs Butterfly Network?▾
What does Kepler Vision do vs Butterfly Network?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Kepler Vision and Butterfly Network competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Butterfly Network has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 85 vs Kepler Vision's 30. The difference comes down to funding depth and team scale.
Who Should You Watch?
Butterfly Network is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Kepler Vision has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.