Pagaya vs Thought Machine
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Thought Machine is valued at $2.7B — more than 3x Pagaya's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Pagaya
1 win
Thought Machine
2 wins
Key Numbers
🇮🇱 Israel · Gal Krubiner
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$600M
500-1000 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Paul Taylor
Valuation
$2.7B
Total Funding
$563M
500-1000 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Finance space, though from different geographies — Pagaya in Israel and Thought Machine in United Kingdom. Different stages (Public vs Series D) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Finance, Pagaya and Thought Machine rank among the most closely watched rivals. Pagaya operates an AI financial underwriting network that processes consumer loan applications on behalf of lenders, using machine learning models that evaluate creditworthiness across a broader set of data signals than traditional credit bureau scores, enabling lenders to approve more applicants while maintaining or improving default rates. Thought Machine builds Vault, a cloud-native core banking platform that uses a smart contract programming language to define financial products as configurable code rather than hardcoded legacy software.
Funding & Valuation
Only Thought Machine has a public valuation on record ($2.7B); Pagaya's has not been disclosed. Pagaya has raised $600M while Thought Machine has raised $563M, keeping their war chests in the same ballpark.
Growth Stage
The founding gap is narrow: Thought Machine in 2014 versus Pagaya in 2016. Growth stages differ: Pagaya (Public) versus Thought Machine (Series D), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: Pagaya employs 500-1000 people versus Thought Machine's 500-1000.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇮🇱 Israel and 🇬🇧 United Kingdom respectively, Pagaya and Thought Machine tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. Awaira rates Thought Machine at 85 and Pagaya at 70, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Under Gal Krubiner and Paul Taylor respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Pagaya
Thought Machine
Funding History
Pagaya has completed 1 funding round, while Thought Machine has gone through 2. Pagaya's most recent round was a Series D of $102M, compared to Thought Machine's Series D ($160M). Pagaya is at Public while Thought Machine is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Pagaya has about 500-1000 people and Thought Machine has around 500-1000. They're close in age — Pagaya started in 2016 and Thought Machine in 2014. Geographically, they're in different markets — Pagaya operates out of Israel and Thought Machine from United Kingdom.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Pagaya | Thought Machine |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $2.7B |
📈Total Funding | $600MWINS | $563M |
📅Founded | 2016WINS | 2014 |
🚀Stage | Public | Series D |
👥Employees | 500-1000 | 500-1000 |
🌍Country | Israel | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | AI Finance | AI Finance |
⭐Awaira Score | 70 | 85WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Pagaya has raised $37M more ($600M vs $563M)
Market experience: Thought Machine has 2 years more (founded 2014 vs 2016)
Growth stage: Pagaya is at Public vs Thought Machine at Series D
Market base: 🇮🇱 Pagaya (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Thought Machine (United Kingdom)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Finance market segment
Awaira Score: Thought Machine scores 85/100 vs Pagaya's 70/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Pagaya if…
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $600M
- ✓Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Pagaya operates an AI financial underwriting network that processes consumer loan applications on behalf of lenders, using machine learning models that evaluate creditworthiness across a broader set of data signals than traditional credit bureau scores, enabling lenders to approve more applicants while maintaining or improving default rates
Choose Thought Machine if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 70/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($2.7B)
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2014
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Thought Machine builds Vault, a cloud-native core banking platform that uses a smart contract programming language to define financial products as configurable code rather than hardcoded legacy software
Funding History
Pagaya raised $600M across 1 round. Thought Machine raised $563M across 2 rounds.
Pagaya
Series D
Jul 2021
Lead: Oak HC/FT
Thought Machine
Series D
Oct 2023
Lead: Temasek
Series C
May 2022
Lead: Temasek
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Pagaya
Unique to Thought Machine
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Pagaya vs Thought Machine
Is Pagaya bigger than Thought Machine?▾
Which company raised more funding — Pagaya or Thought Machine?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Pagaya vs Thought Machine?▾
What does Pagaya do vs Thought Machine?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Pagaya and Thought Machine competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Thought Machine edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 85, but Pagaya (70) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Thought Machine has a slight edge on paper, but Pagaya isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.