Skip to main content

Pagaya vs Thought Machine

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Thought Machine is valued at $2.7B — more than 3x Pagaya's N/A.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Thought Machine leads on 2 of 4 metrics

Pagaya

1 win

+Funding
-Awaira Score
=Team Size
-Experience

Thought Machine

2 wins

-Funding
+Awaira Score
=Team Size
+Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
N/A
$2.7B
Total Funding
$600M
$563M
Awaira Score
70/100
85/100
Employees
500-1000
500-1000
Founded
2016
2014
Stage
Public
Series D
PagayaThought Machine
Pagaya logo
Pagaya

🇮🇱 Israel · Gal Krubiner

PublicAI FinanceEst. 2016

Valuation

N/A

Total Funding

$600M

Awaira Score70/100

500-1000 employees

Full Pagaya Profile →
Winner
Thought Machine logo
Thought Machine

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Paul Taylor

Series DAI FinanceEst. 2014

Valuation

$2.7B

Total Funding

$563M

Awaira Score85/100

500-1000 employees

Full Thought Machine Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Finance space, though from different geographies — Pagaya in Israel and Thought Machine in United Kingdom. Different stages (Public vs Series D) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within AI Finance, Pagaya and Thought Machine rank among the most closely watched rivals. Pagaya operates an AI financial underwriting network that processes consumer loan applications on behalf of lenders, using machine learning models that evaluate creditworthiness across a broader set of data signals than traditional credit bureau scores, enabling lenders to approve more applicants while maintaining or improving default rates. Thought Machine builds Vault, a cloud-native core banking platform that uses a smart contract programming language to define financial products as configurable code rather than hardcoded legacy software.

Funding & Valuation

Only Thought Machine has a public valuation on record ($2.7B); Pagaya's has not been disclosed. Pagaya has raised $600M while Thought Machine has raised $563M, keeping their war chests in the same ballpark.

Growth Stage

The founding gap is narrow: Thought Machine in 2014 versus Pagaya in 2016. Growth stages differ: Pagaya (Public) versus Thought Machine (Series D), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Team sizes also differ: Pagaya employs 500-1000 people versus Thought Machine's 500-1000.

Geography & Outlook

Based in 🇮🇱 Israel and 🇬🇧 United Kingdom respectively, Pagaya and Thought Machine tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. Awaira rates Thought Machine at 85 and Pagaya at 70, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Under Gal Krubiner and Paul Taylor respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Pagaya

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$102M

Thought Machine

Total Rounds2
Avg. Round Size$180M
Funding Span1.4 yrs

Funding History

Pagaya has completed 1 funding round, while Thought Machine has gone through 2. Pagaya's most recent round was a Series D of $102M, compared to Thought Machine's Series D ($160M). Pagaya is at Public while Thought Machine is at Series D — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Pagaya has about 500-1000 people and Thought Machine has around 500-1000. They're close in age — Pagaya started in 2016 and Thought Machine in 2014. Geographically, they're in different markets — Pagaya operates out of Israel and Thought Machine from United Kingdom.

Metrics Comparison

MetricPagayaThought Machine
💰Valuation
N/A
$2.7B
📈Total Funding
$600MWINS
$563M
📅Founded
2016WINS
2014
🚀Stage
Public
Series D
👥Employees
500-1000
500-1000
🌍Country
Israel
United Kingdom
🏷️Category
AI Finance
AI Finance
Awaira Score
70
85WINS

Key Differences

📈

Funding gap: Pagaya has raised $37M more ($600M vs $563M)

📅

Market experience: Thought Machine has 2 years more (founded 2014 vs 2016)

🚀

Growth stage: Pagaya is at Public vs Thought Machine at Series D

🌍

Market base: 🇮🇱 Pagaya (Israel) vs 🇬🇧 Thought Machine (United Kingdom)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Finance market segment

Awaira Score: Thought Machine scores 85/100 vs Pagaya's 70/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Pagaya logo

Choose Pagaya if…

  • Stronger investor backing — raised $600M
  • Israel-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Pagaya operates an AI financial underwriting network that processes consumer loan applications on behalf of lenders, using machine learning models that evaluate creditworthiness across a broader set of data signals than traditional credit bureau scores, enabling lenders to approve more applicants while maintaining or improving default rates
Thought Machine logo

Choose Thought Machine if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 85/100 vs 70/100
  • More established by valuation ($2.7B)
  • More market experience — founded in 2014
  • United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Thought Machine builds Vault, a cloud-native core banking platform that uses a smart contract programming language to define financial products as configurable code rather than hardcoded legacy software

Funding History

Pagaya raised $600M across 1 round. Thought Machine raised $563M across 2 rounds.

Pagaya

Series D

Jul 2021

Lead: Oak HC/FT

$102M

Thought Machine

Series D

Oct 2023

Lead: Temasek

$160M

Series C

May 2022

Lead: Temasek

$200M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Pagaya

Oak HC/FTGICAflac Global Ventures

Unique to Thought Machine

TemasekIntesa SanpaoloMorgan StanleyNyca PartnersING Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Pagaya vs Thought Machine

Is Pagaya bigger than Thought Machine?
Thought Machine has a disclosed valuation of $2.7B, while Pagaya's valuation is not publicly available, making a direct size comparison difficult. Thought Machine employs 500-1000 people.
Which company raised more funding — Pagaya or Thought Machine?
Pagaya has raised more in total funding at $600M, compared to Thought Machine's $563M — a gap of $37M. Combined, the two companies have completed 3 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Thought Machine leads with an Awaira Score of 85/100, while Pagaya sits at 70/100. That 15-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Pagaya vs Thought Machine?
Pagaya was founded by Gal Krubiner in 2016. Thought Machine was founded by Paul Taylor in 2014. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Pagaya do vs Thought Machine?
Pagaya: Pagaya operates an AI financial underwriting network that processes consumer loan applications on behalf of lenders, using machine learning models that evaluate creditworthiness across a broader set of data signals than traditional credit bureau scores, enabling lenders to approve more applicants while maintaining or improving default rates. The Tel Aviv and New York company monetises by taking a network fee on loan volume processed through its AI underwriting system, funded by institutional investors who purchase the approved loan pools.\n\nThe company went public on NASDAQ via SPAC merger, having raised over $600 million in combined public and private funding from investors including Oak HC/FT and Viola Growth. Pagaya reports processing hundreds of billions of dollars in loan applications annually across personal loans, auto loans, and mortgage products, with network partners including SoFi, Ally Financial, and US Bank embedded in its origination technology. The business model operates as an AI network sitting between lenders who originate applications and institutional investors who fund approved loans.\n\nPageya competes in the AI credit underwriting market against ZestFinance, Upstart, and traditional credit bureau scoring models from Fair Isaac. Its network model, where multiple lenders access the same AI infrastructure and their collective data improves model performance over time, creates compounding advantages compared to single-lender AI implementations. The company has navigated regulatory scrutiny around AI lending decisions and disparate impact as financial regulators increase oversight of alternative data use in credit decisions. Thought Machine: Thought Machine builds Vault, a cloud-native core banking platform that uses a smart contract programming language to define financial products as configurable code rather than hardcoded legacy software. The London company targets tier-one and tier-two banks seeking to replace decades-old mainframe core banking systems with a modern, API-first platform that can deploy on any major cloud provider and enable rapid product iteration.\n\nThe company raised approximately $563 million including a $160 million Series D led by Temasek, with Intesa Sanpaolo and Standard Chartered among its strategic investors, giving it a valuation of approximately $2.7 billion. Thought Machine counts Lloyds Bank, Curve, SEB, and JPMorgan among its enterprise clients, with live deployments processing significant volumes of retail and commercial banking transactions on its cloud-native infrastructure.\n\nThought Machine operates in a core banking replacement market estimated at over $10 billion annually, competing with Temenos, Finacle, and Mambu for bank transformation budgets. Its product architecture is considered technically differentiated by banking analysts, as the smart contract approach to product configuration allows banks to define entirely novel financial products without custom development work. The company faces the long sales cycles and regulatory validation requirements inherent in replacing critical banking infrastructure, but its growing client roster of established financial institutions validates its position as a credible replacement for legacy core banking vendors.
Which company was founded first?
Thought Machine got there first, launching in 2014 — that's 2 years of extra runway. Pagaya didn't arrive until 2016. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Both Pagaya and Thought Machine report about 500-1000 employees. Team size is a rough proxy for scale, but lean AI companies routinely punch above their headcount.
Are Pagaya and Thought Machine competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Pagaya and Thought Machine compete in AI Finance, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Thought Machine edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 85, but Pagaya (70) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Thought Machine has a slight edge on paper, but Pagaya isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive