Realeyes vs Tractable
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Tractable is valued at $1B — more than 3x Realeyes's N/A.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Realeyes
1 win
Tractable
2 wins
Key Numbers
🇪🇪 Estonia · Mihkel Jäätma
Valuation
N/A
Total Funding
$30M
100-500 employees
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · Alexandre Dalyac
Valuation
$1B
Total Funding
$185M
100-500 employees
As Computer Vision players, Realeyes and Tractable target overlapping customers despite operating from different countries. The stage gap — Realeyes at Series C vs Tractable at Series E — shapes how each company allocates capital and talent.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Computer Vision remains a contested market, with Realeyes and Tractable among its most prominent entrants. Realeyes develops emotion AI and attention measurement technology that uses facial coding and computer vision to analyse viewer emotional responses to video content, providing advertising effectiveness measurement, content testing, and attention analytics to media companies, advertisers, and market research firms. Tractable builds AI systems for visual damage assessment in insurance and automotive claims processing, using deep learning models trained on millions of historical repair estimates and vehicle inspection images.
Funding & Valuation
Tractable carries a disclosed valuation of $1B, while Realeyes remains privately valued. With $185M raised, Tractable has attracted substantially more capital than Realeyes ($30M).
Growth Stage
Realeyes (est. 2007) predates Tractable (est. 2014) by 7 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Growth stages differ: Realeyes (Series C) versus Tractable (Series E), a distinction that matters for both deal structure and competitive positioning. Headcount tells a story too: Realeyes has 100-500 employees and Tractable has 100-500.
Geography & Outlook
Based in 🇪🇪 Estonia and 🇬🇧 United Kingdom respectively, Realeyes and Tractable tap into different talent markets and regulatory environments. On Awaira's 0-100 scale, Tractable leads decisively at 80 compared to Realeyes's 48. Realeyes, led by Mihkel Jäätma, and Tractable, led by Alexandre Dalyac, each bring distinct leadership visions to the AI sector.
Funding Velocity
Realeyes
Tractable
Funding History
Realeyes has completed 4 funding rounds, while Tractable has gone through 2. Realeyes's most recent round was a Series C of $16.5M, compared to Tractable's Series D ($65M). Realeyes is at Series C while Tractable is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Team sizes are in the same ballpark: Realeyes has about 100-500 people and Tractable has around 100-500. Realeyes has a 7-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Tractable's 2014. Geographically, they're in different markets — Realeyes operates out of Estonia and Tractable from United Kingdom.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Realeyes | Tractable |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | N/A | $1B |
📈Total Funding | $30M | $185MWINS |
📅Founded | 2007 | 2014WINS |
🚀Stage | Series C | Series E |
👥Employees | 100-500 | 100-500 |
🌍Country | Estonia | United Kingdom |
🏷️Category | Computer Vision | Computer Vision |
⭐Awaira Score | 48 | 80WINS |
Key Differences
Funding gap: Tractable has raised $155M more ($185M vs $30M)
Market experience: Realeyes has 7 years more (founded 2007 vs 2014)
Growth stage: Realeyes is at Series C vs Tractable at Series E
Market base: 🇪🇪 Realeyes (Estonia) vs 🇬🇧 Tractable (United Kingdom)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the Computer Vision market segment
Awaira Score: Tractable scores 80/100 vs Realeyes's 48/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Realeyes if…
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2007
- ✓Estonia-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Realeyes develops emotion AI and attention measurement technology that uses facial coding and computer vision to analyse viewer emotional responses to video content, providing advertising effectiveness measurement, content testing, and attention analytics to media companies, advertisers, and market research firms
Choose Tractable if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 48/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $185M
- ✓United Kingdom-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Tractable builds AI systems for visual damage assessment in insurance and automotive claims processing, using deep learning models trained on millions of historical repair estimates and vehicle inspection images
Funding History
Realeyes raised $30M across 4 rounds. Tractable raised $185M across 2 rounds.
Realeyes
Series C
Jun 2011
Series B
Feb 2010
Series A
Oct 2008
Seed
Jun 2007
Tractable
Series D
Jun 2022
Lead: Insight Partners
Series C
Feb 2020
Lead: Insight Partners
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Tractable
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Realeyes vs Tractable
Is Realeyes bigger than Tractable?▾
Which company raised more funding — Realeyes or Tractable?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Realeyes vs Tractable?▾
What does Realeyes do vs Tractable?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Realeyes and Tractable competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Tractable has a clear lead here — Awaira Score of 80 vs Realeyes's 48. The difference comes down to funding depth and strategic focus.
Who Should You Watch?
Tractable is in the stronger position — better score and deeper pockets. But Realeyes has room to surprise, especially if they land a marquee investor. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.