Skip to main content
Overall Winner: Patsnap·80/ 100

Weaviate vs Patsnap

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Patsnap is valued at $1B — more than 3x Weaviate's $200M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Patsnap leads on 5 of 5 metrics

Weaviate

0 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Patsnap

5 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience
Weaviate logo
Weaviate

🇳🇱 Netherlands · Bob van Luijt

Series BAI DataEst. 2019

Valuation

$200M

Total Funding

$67.5M

Awaira Score72/100

80 employees

Full Weaviate Profile →
Winner
Patsnap logo
Patsnap

🇸🇬 Singapore · Jeffrey Tiong

Series EAI DataEst. 2007

Valuation

$1B

Total Funding

$300M

Awaira Score80/100

500-1000 employees

Full Patsnap Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Weaviate in Netherlands and Patsnap in Singapore. Different stages (Series B vs Series E) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

In the AI Data market, Weaviate and Patsnap represent two distinct approaches. Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities. Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents.

The valuation disparity is stark: Patsnap at $1B versus Weaviate at $200M, a 5x difference. On the funding front, Patsnap has secured $300M, outpacing Weaviate's $67.5M by $232.5M.

Patsnap (est. 2007) predates Weaviate (est. 2019) by 12 years, a significant head start in building market presence. Weaviate is at Series B while Patsnap stands at Series E, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Team sizes also differ: Weaviate employs 80 people versus Patsnap's 500-1000.

Weaviate operates out of 🇳🇱 Netherlands while Patsnap is based in 🇸🇬 Singapore, giving each a distinct home-market advantage. Awaira rates Patsnap at 80 and Weaviate at 72, a gap that reflects differences in capital efficiency and market traction. Under Bob van Luijt and Jeffrey Tiong respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Key Numbers

Valuation
$200M
$1B
Total Funding
$67.5M
$300M
Awaira Score
72/100
80/100
Employees
80
500-1000
Founded
2019
2007
Stage
Series B
Series E
WeaviatePatsnap

Funding Velocity

Weaviate

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$12.6M
Funding Span4 yrs

Patsnap

Total Rounds1
Avg. Round Size$300M

Funding History

Weaviate has completed 3 funding rounds, while Patsnap has gone through 1. Weaviate's most recent round was a Series B, compared to Patsnap's Series E ($300M). Weaviate is at Series B while Patsnap is at Series E — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Patsnap has the bigger team at roughly 500-1000 people — 6x the size of Weaviate's 80. Patsnap has a 12-year head start, founded in 2007 vs Weaviate's 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Weaviate operates out of Netherlands and Patsnap from Singapore.

Metrics Comparison

MetricWeaviatePatsnap
💰Valuation
$200M
$1BWINS
📈Total Funding
$67.5M
$300MWINS
📅Founded
2019WINS
2007
🚀Stage
Series B
Series E
👥Employees
80
500-1000
🌍Country
Netherlands
Singapore
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
72
80WINS

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Patsnap is valued 5x higher ($1B vs $200M)

📈

Funding gap: Patsnap has raised $232.5M more ($300M vs $67.5M)

📅

Market experience: Patsnap has 12 years more (founded 2007 vs 2019)

🚀

Growth stage: Weaviate is at Series B vs Patsnap at Series E

👥

Team size: Weaviate has 80 employees vs Patsnap's 500-1000

🌍

Market base: 🇳🇱 Weaviate (Netherlands) vs 🇸🇬 Patsnap (Singapore)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Patsnap scores 80/100 vs Weaviate's 72/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Weaviate logo

Choose Weaviate if…

  • Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities
Patsnap logo

Choose Patsnap if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 72/100
  • More established by valuation ($1B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $300M
  • More market experience — founded in 2007
  • Singapore-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents

Funding History

Weaviate raised $67.5M across 3 rounds. Patsnap raised $300M across 1 round.

Weaviate

Series B

Jan 2023

Series A

Jun 2021

Lead: Accel

$12.6M

Seed

Jan 2019

Patsnap

Series E

Sep 2021

Lead: SoftBank Vision Fund 2

$300M

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Weaviate

AccelDatabricks VenturesSapphire Ventures

Unique to Patsnap

SoftBank Vision Fund 2TencentSequoia Capital China

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Weaviate vs Patsnap

Is Weaviate bigger than Patsnap?
By valuation, Patsnap is the larger company at $1B versus $200M — a 5x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Weaviate employs 80 people while Patsnap has 500-1000 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Weaviate or Patsnap?
Patsnap has raised more in total funding at $300M, compared to Weaviate's $67.5M — a gap of $232.5M. Combined, the two companies have completed 4 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Patsnap leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while Weaviate sits at 72/100. That 8-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Weaviate vs Patsnap?
Weaviate was founded by Bob van Luijt in 2019. Patsnap was founded by Jeffrey Tiong in 2007. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Weaviate do vs Patsnap?
Weaviate: Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities. The platform stores, indexes, and searches unstructured data—including text, images, and audio—by converting them into vector embeddings, making it suitable for large language model applications and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. The core product is an open-source vector database with both community and enterprise versions. Weaviate allows developers to perform similarity searches and build knowledge graphs with semantic understanding. The platform integrates with machine learning frameworks and supports various embedding models, enabling organizations to power AI applications without extensive machine learning infrastructure expertise. Founded during the emergence of modern AI applications, Weaviate operates in the expanding vector database category competing with Pinecone, Milvus, and Qdrant. The company has raised $68 million across funding rounds with a valuation of $200 million as of its Series B stage. Weaviate serves use cases across e-commerce recommendation systems, content discovery, semantic search, and enterprise search applications. The company has gained adoption among developers and organizations building AI-powered products. Its open-source approach provides both community engagement and enterprise monetization pathways. The vector database market has experienced significant growth as organizations increasingly adopt large language models requiring efficient vector storage and retrieval infrastructure. Weaviate combines open-source accessibility with enterprise vector database capabilities positioned to capture growth in RAG and semantic search application development. Patsnap: Patsnap provides an AI-powered patent analytics and intellectual property intelligence platform that enables R&D teams, IP lawyers, and corporate strategy teams to search, analyse, and monitor global patent databases using machine learning to surface technology trends, competitor patent activity, and freedom-to-operate insights from over 170 million patent documents. The Singapore company integrates patent data with scientific literature and chemical structure databases to provide a comprehensive IP and technology intelligence environment.\n\nThe company raised approximately $300 million including a Series E round from investors including SoftBank Vision Fund 2, Tencent, and CPE Yunji, reaching a valuation exceeding $1 billion. Patsnap serves over 10,000 companies globally including R&D-intensive organisations in pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and consumer electronics that use patent landscape analysis to inform technology strategy and investment decisions.\n\nPatsnap competes in the IP analytics market against Derwent Advancement (Clarivate), Questel Orbit, and Minesoft, as well as general enterprise search platforms that include patent data. Its AI capabilities for patent claim analysis, technology trend extraction, and cross-domain IP search differentiate it from traditional Boolean-search patent databases, enabling R&D strategy questions to be answered through AI-assisted analysis rather than manual patent review. The Singapore base provides access to both the Southeast Asian technology market and a sophisticated legal and financial services market for IP monetisation and licensing analytics.
Which company was founded first?
Patsnap got there first, launching in 2007 — that's 12 years of extra runway. Weaviate didn't arrive until 2019. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Weaviate has about 80 employees; Patsnap has about 500-1000. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Weaviate and Patsnap competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Weaviate and Patsnap compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Patsnap edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 80, but Weaviate (72) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Patsnap has a slight edge on paper, but Weaviate isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive