Weights and Biases vs Weaviate
Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more
Comparison updated: April 2026
Weights and Biases is valued at $1.3B — more than 3x Weaviate's $200M.
Head-to-Head Verdict
Weights and Biases
5 wins
Weaviate
0 wins
Key Numbers
🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald
Valuation
$1.3B
Total Funding
$250M
300 employees
🇳🇱 Netherlands · Bob van Luijt
Valuation
$200M
Total Funding
$67.5M
80 employees
Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Weights and Biases in United States and Weaviate in Netherlands. Different stages (Acquired vs Series B) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.
Analyst Summary
Built from real data · Updated April 2026
Companies
Within AI Data, Weights and Biases and Weaviate rank among the most closely watched rivals. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities.
Funding & Valuation
Weights and Biases commands a $1.3B valuation — roughly 6.3x that of Weaviate at $200M, a gap that underscores their different scales. Weights and Biases has amassed $250M in total funding, far exceeding Weaviate's $67.5M.
Growth Stage
Established in 2017, Weights and Biases has a modest 2-year head start over Weaviate (2019). Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Weaviate stands at Series B, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Weights and Biases has 300 employees and Weaviate has 80.
Geography & Outlook
Geography separates them: Weights and Biases in 🇺🇸 United States and Weaviate in 🇳🇱 Netherlands, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Weights and Biases holds a moderate edge on Awaira's composite score (80 vs. 72), driven by stronger fundamentals in funding and growth metrics. Under Lukas Biewald and Bob van Luijt respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.
Funding Velocity
Weights and Biases
Weaviate
Funding History
Weights and Biases has completed 5 funding rounds, while Weaviate has gone through 3. Weights and Biases's most recent round was a Series C of $50M, compared to Weaviate's Series B. Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Weaviate is at Series B — different points in their growth trajectory.
Team & Scale
Weights and Biases is significantly larger with about 300 employees, compared to Weaviate's 80. That's a 4x difference in headcount. They're close in age — Weights and Biases started in 2017 and Weaviate in 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Weights and Biases operates out of United States and Weaviate from Netherlands.
Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Weights and Biases | Weaviate |
|---|---|---|
💰Valuation | $1.3BWINS | $200M |
📈Total Funding | $250MWINS | $67.5M |
📅Founded | 2017 | 2019WINS |
🚀Stage | Acquired | Series B |
👥Employees | 300 | 80 |
🌍Country | United States | Netherlands |
🏷️Category | AI Data | AI Data |
⭐Awaira Score | 80WINS | 72 |
Key Differences
Valuation gap: Weights and Biases is valued 6.3x higher ($1.3B vs $200M)
Funding gap: Weights and Biases has raised $182.5M more ($250M vs $67.5M)
Market experience: Weights and Biases has 2 years more (founded 2017 vs 2019)
Growth stage: Weights and Biases is at Acquired vs Weaviate at Series B
Team size: Weights and Biases has 300 employees vs Weaviate's 80
Market base: 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States) vs 🇳🇱 Weaviate (Netherlands)
Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment
Awaira Score: Weights and Biases scores 80/100 vs Weaviate's 72/100
Which Should You Choose?
Use these signals to make the right call
Choose Weights and Biases if…
Top Pick- ✓Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 72/100
- ✓More established by valuation ($1.3B)
- ✓Stronger investor backing — raised $250M
- ✓More market experience — founded in 2017
- ✓United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Choose Weaviate if…
- ✓Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
- ✓Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities
Funding History
Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds. Weaviate raised $67.5M across 3 rounds.
Weights and Biases
Series C
Aug 2023
Lead: Daniel Gross
Series C
Sep 2022
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series B
Mar 2021
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Apr 2019
Lead: Sequoia Capital
Series A
Jan 2018
Lead: Google Ventures
Weaviate
Series B
Jan 2023
Series A
Jun 2021
Lead: Accel
Seed
Jan 2019
Investor Comparison
No shared investors detected between these two companies.
Unique to Weights and Biases
Unique to Weaviate
Users Also Compare
Explore Further
FAQ — Weights and Biases vs Weaviate
Is Weights and Biases bigger than Weaviate?▾
Which company raised more funding — Weights and Biases or Weaviate?▾
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?▾
Who founded Weights and Biases vs Weaviate?▾
What does Weights and Biases do vs Weaviate?▾
Which company was founded first?▾
Which company has more employees?▾
Are Weights and Biases and Weaviate competitors?▾
Bottom Line
Weights and Biases edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 80, but Weaviate (72) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.
Who Should You Watch?
Weights and Biases has a slight edge on paper, but Weaviate isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.