Skip to main content

Weights and Biases vs Weaviate

Side-by-side on valuation, funding, investors, founders & more

Comparison updated: April 2026

Weights and Biases is valued at $1.3B — more than 3x Weaviate's $200M.

Head-to-Head Verdict

Weights and Biases leads on 5 of 5 metrics

Weights and Biases

5 wins

+Valuation
+Funding
+Awaira Score
+Team Size
+Experience

Weaviate

0 wins

-Valuation
-Funding
-Awaira Score
-Team Size
-Experience

Key Numbers

Valuation
$1.3B
$200M
Total Funding
$250M
$67.5M
Awaira Score
80/100
72/100
Employees
300
80
Founded
2017
2019
Stage
Acquired
Series B
Weights and BiasesWeaviate
Winner
Weights and Biases logo
Weights and Biases

🇺🇸 United States · Lukas Biewald

AcquiredAI DataEst. 2017

Valuation

$1.3B

Total Funding

$250M

Awaira Score80/100

300 employees

Full Weights and Biases Profile →
Weaviate logo
Weaviate

🇳🇱 Netherlands · Bob van Luijt

Series BAI DataEst. 2019

Valuation

$200M

Total Funding

$67.5M

Awaira Score72/100

80 employees

Full Weaviate Profile →
Market Context

Both companies compete in the AI Data space, though from different geographies — Weights and Biases in United States and Weaviate in Netherlands. Different stages (Acquired vs Series B) mean these companies face fundamentally different operational priorities.

🔬

Analyst Summary

Built from real data · Updated April 2026

Companies

Within AI Data, Weights and Biases and Weaviate rank among the most closely watched rivals. Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities.

Funding & Valuation

Weights and Biases commands a $1.3B valuation — roughly 6.3x that of Weaviate at $200M, a gap that underscores their different scales. Weights and Biases has amassed $250M in total funding, far exceeding Weaviate's $67.5M.

Growth Stage

Established in 2017, Weights and Biases has a modest 2-year head start over Weaviate (2019). Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Weaviate stands at Series B, indicating different levels of maturity and investor risk. Headcount tells a story too: Weights and Biases has 300 employees and Weaviate has 80.

Geography & Outlook

Geography separates them: Weights and Biases in 🇺🇸 United States and Weaviate in 🇳🇱 Netherlands, each benefiting from local ecosystems. Weights and Biases holds a moderate edge on Awaira's composite score (80 vs. 72), driven by stronger fundamentals in funding and growth metrics. Under Lukas Biewald and Bob van Luijt respectively, both companies continue to chart aggressive growth paths.

Funding Velocity

Weights and Biases

Total Rounds5
Avg. Round Size$49M
Funding Span5.6 yrs

Weaviate

Total Rounds3
Avg. Round Size$12.6M
Funding Span4 yrs

Funding History

Weights and Biases has completed 5 funding rounds, while Weaviate has gone through 3. Weights and Biases's most recent round was a Series C of $50M, compared to Weaviate's Series B. Weights and Biases is at Acquired while Weaviate is at Series B — different points in their growth trajectory.

Team & Scale

Weights and Biases is significantly larger with about 300 employees, compared to Weaviate's 80. That's a 4x difference in headcount. They're close in age — Weights and Biases started in 2017 and Weaviate in 2019. Geographically, they're in different markets — Weights and Biases operates out of United States and Weaviate from Netherlands.

Metrics Comparison

MetricWeights and BiasesWeaviate
💰Valuation
$1.3BWINS
$200M
📈Total Funding
$250MWINS
$67.5M
📅Founded
2017
2019WINS
🚀Stage
Acquired
Series B
👥Employees
300
80
🌍Country
United States
Netherlands
🏷️Category
AI Data
AI Data
Awaira Score
80WINS
72

Key Differences

💰

Valuation gap: Weights and Biases is valued 6.3x higher ($1.3B vs $200M)

📈

Funding gap: Weights and Biases has raised $182.5M more ($250M vs $67.5M)

📅

Market experience: Weights and Biases has 2 years more (founded 2017 vs 2019)

🚀

Growth stage: Weights and Biases is at Acquired vs Weaviate at Series B

👥

Team size: Weights and Biases has 300 employees vs Weaviate's 80

🌍

Market base: 🇺🇸 Weights and Biases (United States) vs 🇳🇱 Weaviate (Netherlands)

⚔️

Direct competitors: Both operate in the AI Data market segment

Awaira Score: Weights and Biases scores 80/100 vs Weaviate's 72/100

Which Should You Choose?

Use these signals to make the right call

Weights and Biases logo

Choose Weights and Biases if…

Top Pick
  • Higher Awaira Score — 80/100 vs 72/100
  • More established by valuation ($1.3B)
  • Stronger investor backing — raised $250M
  • More market experience — founded in 2017
  • United States-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development
Weaviate logo

Choose Weaviate if…

  • Netherlands-based for regional compliance or proximity
  • Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities

Funding History

Weights and Biases raised $250M across 5 rounds. Weaviate raised $67.5M across 3 rounds.

Weights and Biases

Series C

Aug 2023

Lead: Daniel Gross

$50M

Series C

Sep 2022

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$125M

Series B

Mar 2021

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$50M

Series A

Apr 2019

Lead: Sequoia Capital

$15M

Series A

Jan 2018

Lead: Google Ventures

$5M

Weaviate

Series B

Jan 2023

Series A

Jun 2021

Lead: Accel

$12.6M

Seed

Jan 2019

Investor Comparison

No shared investors detected between these two companies.

Unique to Weights and Biases

Daniel GrossSequoia CapitalGoogle VenturesSalesforce VenturesAndreessen Horowitz

Unique to Weaviate

AccelDatabricks VenturesSapphire Ventures

Users Also Compare

FAQ — Weights and Biases vs Weaviate

Is Weights and Biases bigger than Weaviate?
By valuation, Weights and Biases is the larger company at $1.3B versus $200M — a 6.3x difference. Size can also be measured by team: Weights and Biases employs 300 people while Weaviate has 80 employees.
Which company raised more funding — Weights and Biases or Weaviate?
Weights and Biases has raised more in total funding at $250M, compared to Weaviate's $67.5M — a gap of $182.5M. Combined, the two companies have completed 8 known funding rounds.
Which company has a higher Awaira Score?
Weights and Biases leads with an Awaira Score of 80/100, while Weaviate sits at 72/100. That 8-point gap reflects real differences in funding, scale, and traction — it's not a vanity metric.
Who founded Weights and Biases vs Weaviate?
Weights and Biases was founded by Lukas Biewald in 2017. Weaviate was founded by Bob van Luijt in 2019. Visit each company's profile on Awaira for a full founder biography.
What does Weights and Biases do vs Weaviate?
Weights and Biases: Weights and Biases is a machine learning platform founded in 2017 that provides infrastructure for experiment tracking, model management, and collaboration in AI development. The company's core product enables data scientists and ML engineers to log, visualize, and compare machine learning experiments, addressing the reproducibility and collaboration challenges inherent in modern AI workflows. The platform integrates with popular ML frameworks including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn, allowing teams to track metrics, parameters, and outputs across training runs. W&B's offering extends to model registry capabilities, enabling organizations to version, document, and deploy models systematically. The company serves enterprises across computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning domains. As of its Series C funding stage, Weights and Biases has raised $250 million at a $1.3 billion valuation, positioning it among well-capitalized AI infrastructure startups. The company competes in the ML operations space alongside platforms like Databricks and Neptune, differentiating through its focus on experiment tracking and accessibility to individual practitioners and teams. Notable adoption spans research institutions and technology companies implementing large-scale ML pipelines. The platform's freemium model has facilitated rapid adoption within the academic and startup ecosystems, while enterprise offerings target organizations requiring advanced governance and integration capabilities. Growth trajectory reflects increasing enterprise demand for ML operations infrastructure. Weights and Biases occupies a critical position in the ML operations stack by specializing in experiment tracking and model management, essential infrastructure that bridges individual data scientist workflows and enterprise-scale ML deployment. Weaviate: Weaviate is a Netherlands-based vector database company founded in 2019 that enables organizations to build AI applications using vector search and semantic search capabilities. The platform stores, indexes, and searches unstructured data—including text, images, and audio—by converting them into vector embeddings, making it suitable for large language model applications and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. The core product is an open-source vector database with both community and enterprise versions. Weaviate allows developers to perform similarity searches and build knowledge graphs with semantic understanding. The platform integrates with machine learning frameworks and supports various embedding models, enabling organizations to power AI applications without extensive machine learning infrastructure expertise. Founded during the emergence of modern AI applications, Weaviate operates in the expanding vector database category competing with Pinecone, Milvus, and Qdrant. The company has raised $68 million across funding rounds with a valuation of $200 million as of its Series B stage. Weaviate serves use cases across e-commerce recommendation systems, content discovery, semantic search, and enterprise search applications. The company has gained adoption among developers and organizations building AI-powered products. Its open-source approach provides both community engagement and enterprise monetization pathways. The vector database market has experienced significant growth as organizations increasingly adopt large language models requiring efficient vector storage and retrieval infrastructure. Weaviate combines open-source accessibility with enterprise vector database capabilities positioned to capture growth in RAG and semantic search application development.
Which company was founded first?
Weights and Biases got there first, launching in 2017 — that's 2 years of extra runway. Weaviate didn't arrive until 2019. In AI, that kind of head start means more training data, deeper customer relationships, and a bigger talent moat.
Which company has more employees?
Weights and Biases has about 300 employees; Weaviate has about 80. A bigger team usually means more revenue or heavier VC backing, but in AI, small teams can build at massive scale.
Are Weights and Biases and Weaviate competitors?
Yes — they're direct rivals. Both Weights and Biases and Weaviate compete in AI Data, targeting many of the same buyers. If you're evaluating one, you should be looking at the other.

Bottom Line

Weights and Biases edges ahead with an Awaira Score of 80, but Weaviate (72) isn't far behind. The gap is narrow enough that it could shift with the next funding round.

Who Should You Watch?

Weights and Biases has a slight edge on paper, but Weaviate isn't far behind. The AI space moves fast — today's underdog can be tomorrow's category leader. Follow both profiles on Awaira to track funding rounds, team changes, and score updates.

Deep Dive