Claude 3 OpusvsClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic vs Anthropic — Side-by-side model comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | Claude 3 Opus | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Arena Rank | #7 | #8 |
| Context Window | 200K | 200K |
| Input Pricing | $15.00/1M tokens | $3.00/1M tokens |
| Output Pricing | $75.00/1M tokens | $15.00/1M tokens |
| Parameters | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Best For | Complex analysis, research, nuanced writing | Coding, analysis, writing, vision |
| Release Date | Mar 4, 2024 | Oct 22, 2024 |
Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3 Opus, developed by Anthropic, is the most capable model in the Claude 3 generation with a 200K token context window. The model specializes in complex analysis, research synthesis, nuanced writing, and tasks requiring deep comprehension of lengthy documents. Claude 3 Opus demonstrated state-of-the-art performance when released, matching or exceeding GPT-4 on multiple benchmarks including MMLU and HumanEval. Its Constitutional AI training approach emphasizes safety and accuracy while maintaining strong creative and analytical capabilities. Priced at $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens, it targets enterprise use cases where output quality justifies premium pricing. Claude 3 Opus ranks #7 on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard, reflecting its position among the most capable language models available.
View Anthropic profile →Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet was Anthropic's previous generation balanced model that set new industry benchmarks when released. It demonstrated that mid-tier models could compete with and even surpass flagship models from competitors on coding, reasoning, and analysis tasks. The model featured a 200K token context window and introduced Anthropic's Artifacts feature for interactive code execution. Claude 3.5 Sonnet became one of the most popular models for professional developers and enterprises, known for its excellent code generation, careful instruction following, and reduced hallucination rates. While now succeeded by Claude Sonnet 4, it remains widely deployed in production systems and continues to offer strong performance at its price point. It was instrumental in establishing Anthropic as a serious competitor to OpenAI.
View Anthropic profile →Key Differences: Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3 Opus ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#7) indicating stronger overall performance.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 5.0x cheaper on average, making it the better choice for high-volume applications.
When to use Claude 3 Opus
- +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
- +Quality matters more than cost
- +Your use case involves complex analysis, research, nuanced writing
When to use Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- +Budget is a concern and you need cost efficiency
- +Your use case involves coding, analysis, writing, vision
Cost Analysis
At current pricing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 5.0x more affordable than Claude 3 Opus. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:
Claude 3 Opus monthly cost
$4,500
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet monthly cost
$900
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
The Verdict
Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins our head-to-head comparison with 2 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for coding, analysis, writing, vision, though Claude 3 Opus holds an edge in complex analysis, research, nuanced writing.
Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages