Skip to main content
← Back to Models
⚖️

Claude Sonnet 4vsClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic vs Anthropic — Side-by-side model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4 leads 1/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Provider
Arena Rank
#3
#8
Context Window
200K
200K
Input Pricing
$3.00/1M tokens
$3.00/1M tokens
Output Pricing
$15.00/1M tokens
$15.00/1M tokens
Parameters
Undisclosed
Undisclosed
Open Source
No
No
Best For
Coding, writing, long documents
Coding, analysis, writing, vision
Release Date
May 22, 2025
Oct 22, 2024

Claude Sonnet 4

Claude Sonnet 4 is Anthropic's balanced mid-tier model, offering an excellent combination of intelligence, speed, and cost-effectiveness. It ranks among the top 5 models globally on arena benchmarks while being significantly more affordable than Opus 4. With a 200K token context window, Sonnet 4 handles long documents and complex codebases with ease. The model excels at coding tasks (strong SWE-bench performance), long-form writing, document analysis, and structured data extraction. Its extended thinking capabilities allow it to tackle complex problems while maintaining fast response times for everyday tasks. Sonnet 4 is the most popular Claude model for production applications, offering the best price-to-performance ratio in Anthropic's lineup. It supports tool use, vision capabilities, and works seamlessly in agentic workflows.

View Anthropic profile →

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was Anthropic's previous generation balanced model that set new industry benchmarks when released. It demonstrated that mid-tier models could compete with and even surpass flagship models from competitors on coding, reasoning, and analysis tasks. The model featured a 200K token context window and introduced Anthropic's Artifacts feature for interactive code execution. Claude 3.5 Sonnet became one of the most popular models for professional developers and enterprises, known for its excellent code generation, careful instruction following, and reduced hallucination rates. While now succeeded by Claude Sonnet 4, it remains widely deployed in production systems and continues to offer strong performance at its price point. It was instrumental in establishing Anthropic as a serious competitor to OpenAI.

View Anthropic profile →

Key Differences: Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

1

Claude Sonnet 4 ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#3) indicating stronger overall performance.

C

When to use Claude Sonnet 4

  • +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
  • +Your use case involves coding, writing, long documents
View full Claude Sonnet 4 specs →
C

When to use Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • +Your use case involves coding, analysis, writing, vision
View full Claude 3.5 Sonnet specs →

Cost Analysis

Both models have similar pricing. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Claude Sonnet 4 monthly cost

$900

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet monthly cost

$900

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4 wins our head-to-head comparison with 1 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for coding, writing, long documents, though Claude 3.5 Sonnet holds an edge in coding, analysis, writing, vision.

Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
In our head-to-head comparison, Claude Sonnet 4 leads in 1 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Claude Sonnet 4 excels at coding, writing, long documents, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is better suited for coding, analysis, writing, vision. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Claude Sonnet 4 pricing compare to Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
Claude Sonnet 4 charges $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet charges $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
Claude Sonnet 4 supports a 200K token context window, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 4 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet for free?
Claude Sonnet 4 is a paid API model starting at $3.00 per 1M input tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a paid API model starting at $3.00 per 1M input tokens.
Which model has better benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
Claude Sonnet 4 holds arena rank #3, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet holds rank #8. Claude Sonnet 4 performs better in overall arena benchmarks, which aggregate human preference ratings across coding, reasoning, and general tasks. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4 is specifically optimized for coding tasks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is specifically optimized for coding tasks. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.