← Back to Models
⚖️

Grok-2 MinivsGrok 3 Mini

xAI vs xAI — Side-by-side model comparison

Grok 3 Mini leads 1/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricGrok-2 MiniGrok 3 Mini
Provider
Arena Rank
#16
#16
Context Window
128K
128K
Input Pricing
$0.30/1M tokens
$0.30/1M tokens
Output Pricing
$1.50/1M tokens
$0.50/1M tokens
Parameters
Undisclosed
Undisclosed
Open Source
No
No
Best For
Fast responses, chat, lightweight tasks
Lightweight reasoning, fast responses, chat
Release Date
Aug 13, 2024
Apr 12, 2025

Grok-2 Mini

Grok-2 Mini is xAI's smaller, faster model designed for applications that need quick responses at lower cost. It retains the real-time information capabilities of the larger Grok-2 while offering significantly faster inference times. With a 128K context window, it handles most conversational and analytical tasks efficiently, making it suitable for high-volume production deployments.

View xAI profile →

Grok 3 Mini

Grok 3 Mini is xAI's smaller, faster variant of Grok 3, featuring built-in reasoning capabilities at a lower cost point. It maintains Grok's distinctive personality and real-time X (Twitter) data access while offering faster response times and reduced pricing. The model uses internal chain-of-thought reasoning to improve accuracy on complex queries. Grok 3 Mini is positioned as an everyday AI assistant that combines the speed of smaller models with the reasoning improvements of thinking-capable architectures. It's particularly useful for tasks requiring current information, quick analysis, and conversational AI applications.

View xAI profile →
G

When to use Grok-2 Mini

  • +Your use case involves fast responses, chat, lightweight tasks
View full Grok-2 Mini specs →
G

When to use Grok 3 Mini

  • +Your use case involves lightweight reasoning, fast responses, chat
View full Grok 3 Mini specs →

Cost Analysis

Both models have similar pricing. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Grok-2 Mini monthly cost

$90

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

Grok 3 Mini monthly cost

$40

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Grok 3 Mini wins our head-to-head comparison with 1 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for lightweight reasoning, fast responses, chat, though Grok-2 Mini holds an edge in fast responses, chat, lightweight tasks.

Last compared: March 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Grok-2 Mini or Grok 3 Mini?
In our head-to-head comparison, Grok 3 Mini leads in 1 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Grok 3 Mini excels at lightweight reasoning, fast responses, chat, while Grok-2 Mini is better suited for fast responses, chat, lightweight tasks. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Grok-2 Mini pricing compare to Grok 3 Mini?
Grok-2 Mini charges $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.50 per 1M output tokens. Grok 3 Mini charges $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Grok-2 Mini and Grok 3 Mini?
Grok-2 Mini supports a 128K token context window, while Grok 3 Mini supports 128K tokens. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Grok-2 Mini or Grok 3 Mini for free?
Grok-2 Mini is a paid API model starting at $0.30 per 1M input tokens. Grok 3 Mini is a paid API model starting at $0.30 per 1M input tokens.
Which model has better benchmarks, Grok-2 Mini or Grok 3 Mini?
Grok-2 Mini holds arena rank #16, while Grok 3 Mini holds rank #16. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Grok-2 Mini or Grok 3 Mini better for coding?
Grok-2 Mini's primary strength is fast responses, chat, lightweight tasks. Grok 3 Mini's primary strength is lightweight reasoning, fast responses, chat. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.