Skip to main content
← Back to Models
⚖️

Jamba 1.5 LargevsGPT-4o

AI21 Labs vs OpenAI — Side-by-side model comparison

Jamba 1.5 Large leads 4/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricJamba 1.5 LargeGPT-4o
Provider
Arena Rank
#2
Context Window
256K
128K
Input Pricing
$2.00/1M tokens
$2.50/1M tokens
Output Pricing
$8.00/1M tokens
$10.00/1M tokens
Parameters
398B (94B active)
~200B (est.)
Open Source
Yes
No
Best For
Long documents, enterprise RAG, analysis
General purpose, coding, analysis
Release Date
Aug 22, 2024

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba 1.5 Large, developed by AI21 Labs, is a hybrid model combining the Mamba state-space architecture with traditional Transformer layers, featuring 398 billion total parameters (94 billion active) and a 256K token context window. The novel SSM-Transformer design enables efficient processing of very long sequences while maintaining strong performance on reasoning and generation tasks. The architecture offers better throughput than pure Transformer models at equivalent quality, reducing inference costs for long-context workloads. Priced at $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens. As an open-source model, it can be self-hosted for enterprise deployments. Jamba 1.5 Large demonstrates that architectural diversity beyond the dominant Transformer paradigm can yield practical advantages, particularly for applications requiring processing of lengthy legal, scientific, or financial documents.

View AI21 Labs profile →

GPT-4o

GPT-4o is OpenAI's flagship multimodal model, capable of processing text, images, and audio in a unified architecture. The 'o' stands for 'omni,' reflecting its ability to seamlessly handle multiple input types. With a 128K token context window and competitive pricing, it strikes an optimal balance between capability and cost-effectiveness. GPT-4o delivers fast response times while maintaining strong performance across coding, analysis, creative writing, and visual understanding tasks. It powers ChatGPT's default experience and is one of the most widely deployed AI models globally, serving millions of API calls daily. The model supports function calling, JSON mode, and structured outputs, making it highly versatile for production applications. Its combination of speed, quality, and multimodal capabilities makes it the go-to choice for most general-purpose AI applications.

View OpenAI profile →

Key Differences: Jamba 1.5 Large vs GPT-4o

1

Jamba 1.5 Large is 1.3x cheaper on average, making it the better choice for high-volume applications.

2

Jamba 1.5 Large supports a larger context window (256K), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.

3

Jamba 1.5 Large is open-source (free to self-host and fine-tune) while GPT-4o is proprietary (API-only access).

4

Jamba 1.5 Large has 398B (94B active) parameters vs GPT-4o's ~200B (est.), which affects inference speed and capability.

J

When to use Jamba 1.5 Large

  • +Budget is a concern and you need cost efficiency
  • +You need to process long documents (256K context)
  • +You need to self-host or fine-tune the model
  • +Your use case involves long documents, enterprise rag, analysis
View full Jamba 1.5 Large specs →
G

When to use GPT-4o

  • +Quality matters more than cost
  • +You prefer a managed API without infrastructure overhead
  • +Your use case involves general purpose, coding, analysis
View full GPT-4o specs →

Cost Analysis

At current pricing, Jamba 1.5 Large is 1.3x more affordable than GPT-4o. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Jamba 1.5 Large monthly cost

$500

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

GPT-4o monthly cost

$625

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Jamba 1.5 Large wins our head-to-head comparison with 4 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for long documents, enterprise rag, analysis, though GPT-4o holds an edge in general purpose, coding, analysis.

Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Jamba 1.5 Large or GPT-4o?
In our head-to-head comparison, Jamba 1.5 Large leads in 4 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Jamba 1.5 Large excels at long documents, enterprise rag, analysis, while GPT-4o is better suited for general purpose, coding, analysis. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Jamba 1.5 Large pricing compare to GPT-4o?
Jamba 1.5 Large charges $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $8.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-4o charges $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large is the more affordable option, approximately 1.3x cheaper on average. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Jamba 1.5 Large and GPT-4o?
Jamba 1.5 Large supports a 256K token context window, while GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large can process longer documents, codebases, and conversations in a single request. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Jamba 1.5 Large or GPT-4o for free?
Jamba 1.5 Large is a paid API model starting at $2.00 per 1M input tokens. GPT-4o is a paid API model starting at $2.50 per 1M input tokens. Open-source models can be self-hosted for free but require your own GPU infrastructure.
Which model has better benchmarks, Jamba 1.5 Large or GPT-4o?
Jamba 1.5 Large's arena rank is not yet available, while GPT-4o holds rank #2. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Jamba 1.5 Large or GPT-4o better for coding?
Jamba 1.5 Large's primary strength is long documents, enterprise rag, analysis. GPT-4o is specifically optimized for coding tasks. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.