← Back to Models
⚖️

Jamba 1.5 MinivsGPT-4o

AI21 Labs vs OpenAI — Side-by-side model comparison

Jamba 1.5 Mini leads 3/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricJamba 1.5 MiniGPT-4o
Provider
Arena Rank
#2
Context Window
256K
128K
Input Pricing
$0.20/1M tokens
$2.50/1M tokens
Output Pricing
$0.40/1M tokens
$10.00/1M tokens
Parameters
52B (12B active)
~200B (est.)
Open Source
Yes
No
Best For
Cost-effective long-context, summarization
General purpose, coding, analysis
Release Date
Aug 22, 2024

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Jamba 1.5 Mini is AI21 Labs' efficient model sharing the same hybrid SSM-Transformer architecture as its larger sibling. At 52 billion total parameters with only 12 billion active, it delivers strong performance on long-context tasks while being highly cost-effective. The 256K context window combined with low inference costs makes it particularly attractive for applications processing large volumes of documents.

View AI21 Labs profile →

GPT-4o

GPT-4o is OpenAI's flagship multimodal model, capable of processing text, images, and audio in a unified architecture. The 'o' stands for 'omni,' reflecting its ability to seamlessly handle multiple input types. With a 128K token context window and competitive pricing, it strikes an optimal balance between capability and cost-effectiveness. GPT-4o delivers fast response times while maintaining strong performance across coding, analysis, creative writing, and visual understanding tasks. It powers ChatGPT's default experience and is one of the most widely deployed AI models globally, serving millions of API calls daily. The model supports function calling, JSON mode, and structured outputs, making it highly versatile for production applications. Its combination of speed, quality, and multimodal capabilities makes it the go-to choice for most general-purpose AI applications.

View OpenAI profile →

Key Differences: Jamba 1.5 Mini vs GPT-4o

1

Jamba 1.5 Mini is 20.8x cheaper on average, making it the better choice for high-volume applications.

2

Jamba 1.5 Mini supports a larger context window (256K), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.

3

Jamba 1.5 Mini is open-source (free to self-host and fine-tune) while GPT-4o is proprietary (API-only access).

4

Jamba 1.5 Mini has 52B (12B active) parameters vs GPT-4o's ~200B (est.), which affects inference speed and capability.

J

When to use Jamba 1.5 Mini

  • +Budget is a concern and you need cost efficiency
  • +You need to process long documents (256K context)
  • +You need to self-host or fine-tune the model
  • +Your use case involves cost-effective long-context, summarization
View full Jamba 1.5 Mini specs →
G

When to use GPT-4o

  • +Quality matters more than cost
  • +You prefer a managed API without infrastructure overhead
  • +Your use case involves general purpose, coding, analysis
View full GPT-4o specs →

Cost Analysis

At current pricing, Jamba 1.5 Mini is 20.8x more affordable than GPT-4o. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Jamba 1.5 Mini monthly cost

$30

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

GPT-4o monthly cost

$625

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Jamba 1.5 Mini wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for cost-effective long-context, summarization, though GPT-4o holds an edge in general purpose, coding, analysis.

Last compared: March 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Jamba 1.5 Mini or GPT-4o?
In our head-to-head comparison, Jamba 1.5 Mini leads in 3 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Jamba 1.5 Mini excels at cost-effective long-context, summarization, while GPT-4o is better suited for general purpose, coding, analysis. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Jamba 1.5 Mini pricing compare to GPT-4o?
Jamba 1.5 Mini charges $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens. GPT-4o charges $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens. Jamba 1.5 Mini is the more affordable option, approximately 20.8x cheaper on average. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Jamba 1.5 Mini and GPT-4o?
Jamba 1.5 Mini supports a 256K token context window, while GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. Jamba 1.5 Mini can process longer documents, codebases, and conversations in a single request. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Jamba 1.5 Mini or GPT-4o for free?
Jamba 1.5 Mini is a paid API model starting at $0.20 per 1M input tokens. GPT-4o is a paid API model starting at $2.50 per 1M input tokens. Open-source models can be self-hosted for free but require your own GPU infrastructure.
Which model has better benchmarks, Jamba 1.5 Mini or GPT-4o?
Jamba 1.5 Mini's arena rank is not yet available, while GPT-4o holds rank #2. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Jamba 1.5 Mini or GPT-4o better for coding?
Jamba 1.5 Mini's primary strength is cost-effective long-context, summarization. GPT-4o is specifically optimized for coding tasks. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.