Skip to main content
← Back to Models
⚖️

Llama 3.2 90B VisionvsLlama 3.1 405B

Meta AI vs Meta AI — Side-by-side model comparison

Llama 3.1 405B leads 2/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 90B VisionLlama 3.1 405B
Provider
Meta AI
Meta AI
Arena Rank
#11
#9
Context Window
128K
128K
Input Pricing
Free (open)/1M tokens
Free (open)/1M tokens
Output Pricing
Free (open)/1M tokens
Free (open)/1M tokens
Parameters
90B
405B
Open Source
Yes
Yes
Best For
Image understanding, visual QA, multimodal tasks
Complex reasoning, coding, multilingual tasks
Release Date
Sep 25, 2024
Jul 23, 2024

Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Llama 3.2 90B Vision, developed by Meta AI, is a multimodal open-source model with 90 billion parameters and a 128K token context window. The model processes both text and images, enabling visual question answering, document understanding, chart analysis, and image-grounded reasoning tasks. It represents Meta's first open-source model with vision capabilities, extending the Llama family beyond text-only processing. The vision encoder integrates seamlessly with the language model, producing coherent responses that reference visual elements accurately. Free and open-source, it can be deployed on enterprise GPU infrastructure for privacy-sensitive visual AI applications. Llama 3.2 90B Vision ranks #11 on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard, making it one of the highest-ranked open-source multimodal models available and a strong alternative to proprietary vision-language systems.

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B, developed by Meta AI, is the largest open-source language model with 405 billion parameters and a 128K token context window. The model rivaled GPT-4-class performance on many benchmarks at the time of its release, representing one of the most ambitious open-source AI projects in history. Training required massive computational resources, but Meta open-sourced all weights, enabling the global research community to study, fine-tune, and deploy it freely. Llama 3.1 405B requires multiple high-end GPUs for inference, limiting deployment to organizations with substantial compute infrastructure. It supports multilingual tasks, advanced reasoning, and tool use. Llama 3.1 405B ranks #9 on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard, confirming that open-source models can compete at the frontier of AI capability when sufficient resources are invested in training.

Key Differences: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.1 405B

1

Llama 3.1 405B ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#9) indicating stronger overall performance.

2

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has 90B parameters vs Llama 3.1 405B's 405B, which affects inference speed and capability.

L

When to use Llama 3.2 90B Vision

  • +Your use case involves image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks
View full Llama 3.2 90B Vision specs →
L

When to use Llama 3.1 405B

  • +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
  • +Your use case involves complex reasoning, coding, multilingual tasks
View full Llama 3.1 405B specs →

The Verdict

Llama 3.1 405B wins our head-to-head comparison with 2 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for complex reasoning, coding, multilingual tasks, though Llama 3.2 90B Vision holds an edge in image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks.

Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Llama 3.1 405B?
In our head-to-head comparison, Llama 3.1 405B leads in 2 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Llama 3.1 405B excels at complex reasoning, coding, multilingual tasks, while Llama 3.2 90B Vision is better suited for image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Llama 3.2 90B Vision pricing compare to Llama 3.1 405B?
Llama 3.2 90B Vision charges Free (open) per 1M input tokens and Free (open) per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 405B charges Free (open) per 1M input tokens and Free (open) per 1M output tokens. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Llama 3.1 405B?
Llama 3.2 90B Vision supports a 128K token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B supports 128K tokens. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Llama 3.1 405B for free?
Llama 3.2 90B Vision is a paid API model starting at Free (open) per 1M input tokens. Llama 3.1 405B is a paid API model starting at Free (open) per 1M input tokens. Open-source models can be self-hosted for free but require your own GPU infrastructure.
Which model has better benchmarks, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Llama 3.1 405B?
Llama 3.2 90B Vision holds arena rank #11, while Llama 3.1 405B holds rank #9. Llama 3.1 405B performs better in overall arena benchmarks, which aggregate human preference ratings across coding, reasoning, and general tasks. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Llama 3.1 405B better for coding?
Llama 3.2 90B Vision's primary strength is image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks. Llama 3.1 405B is specifically optimized for coding tasks. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.