Llama 3.3vsLlama 4 Maverick
Meta vs Meta — Side-by-side model comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | Llama 3.3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Arena Rank | #13 | #7 |
| Context Window | 128K | 1M |
| Input Pricing | Free/1M tokens | Free/1M tokens |
| Output Pricing | Free/1M tokens | Free/1M tokens |
| Parameters | 70B | 400B MoE (17B active) |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Best For | General purpose, multilingual, coding | Open source, self-hosted, multilingual |
| Release Date | Dec 6, 2024 | Apr 5, 2025 |
Llama 3.3
Llama 3.3 is Meta's most efficient high-performance model, delivering capability comparable to the much larger Llama 3.1 405B while using only 70 billion parameters. This dramatic efficiency gain means organizations can deploy near-frontier AI capabilities on significantly less hardware. The model supports a 128K context window, strong multilingual performance across dozens of languages, and excellent coding and reasoning abilities. As a fully open-source model, it can be self-hosted, fine-tuned for specific domains, and deployed without API costs. Llama 3.3 has become the de facto standard for organizations that need powerful AI but want to maintain control over their infrastructure and data. It's widely available through cloud providers and can run on consumer GPUs.
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick is Meta's flagship open-source model, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward pass (400 billion total). As part of Meta's commitment to open AI development, Maverick can be downloaded, modified, fine-tuned, and deployed without API costs or licensing restrictions. The model demonstrates strong performance across coding, reasoning, creative writing, and multilingual tasks, competing with proprietary models on many benchmarks. It supports natively multimodal inputs including text and images across 12 languages. With a 1 million token context window, Maverick handles extensive documents and codebases. It has become the foundation for thousands of fine-tuned variants across the open-source community, powering applications in healthcare, education, content creation, and enterprise software.
View Meta profile →Key Differences: Llama 3.3 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#7) indicating stronger overall performance.
Llama 4 Maverick supports a larger context window (1M), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.
Llama 3.3 has 70B parameters vs Llama 4 Maverick's 400B MoE (17B active), which affects inference speed and capability.
When to use Llama 3.3
- +Your use case involves general purpose, multilingual, coding
When to use Llama 4 Maverick
- +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
- +You need to process long documents (1M context)
- +Your use case involves open source, self-hosted, multilingual
Cost Analysis
Both models have similar pricing. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:
Llama 3.3 monthly cost
$0
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
Llama 4 Maverick monthly cost
$0
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
The Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for open source, self-hosted, multilingual, though Llama 3.3 holds an edge in general purpose, multilingual, coding.
Last compared: March 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages