← Back to Models
⚖️

Llama 3.3vsLlama 4 Maverick

Meta vs Meta — Side-by-side model comparison

Llama 4 Maverick leads 3/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3Llama 4 Maverick
Provider
Meta
Arena Rank
#13
#7
Context Window
128K
1M
Input Pricing
Free/1M tokens
Free/1M tokens
Output Pricing
Free/1M tokens
Free/1M tokens
Parameters
70B
400B MoE (17B active)
Open Source
Yes
Yes
Best For
General purpose, multilingual, coding
Open source, self-hosted, multilingual
Release Date
Dec 6, 2024
Apr 5, 2025

Llama 3.3

Llama 3.3 is Meta's most efficient high-performance model, delivering capability comparable to the much larger Llama 3.1 405B while using only 70 billion parameters. This dramatic efficiency gain means organizations can deploy near-frontier AI capabilities on significantly less hardware. The model supports a 128K context window, strong multilingual performance across dozens of languages, and excellent coding and reasoning abilities. As a fully open-source model, it can be self-hosted, fine-tuned for specific domains, and deployed without API costs. Llama 3.3 has become the de facto standard for organizations that need powerful AI but want to maintain control over their infrastructure and data. It's widely available through cloud providers and can run on consumer GPUs.

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick is Meta's flagship open-source model, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward pass (400 billion total). As part of Meta's commitment to open AI development, Maverick can be downloaded, modified, fine-tuned, and deployed without API costs or licensing restrictions. The model demonstrates strong performance across coding, reasoning, creative writing, and multilingual tasks, competing with proprietary models on many benchmarks. It supports natively multimodal inputs including text and images across 12 languages. With a 1 million token context window, Maverick handles extensive documents and codebases. It has become the foundation for thousands of fine-tuned variants across the open-source community, powering applications in healthcare, education, content creation, and enterprise software.

View Meta profile →

Key Differences: Llama 3.3 vs Llama 4 Maverick

1

Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#7) indicating stronger overall performance.

2

Llama 4 Maverick supports a larger context window (1M), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.

3

Llama 3.3 has 70B parameters vs Llama 4 Maverick's 400B MoE (17B active), which affects inference speed and capability.

L

When to use Llama 3.3

  • +Your use case involves general purpose, multilingual, coding
View full Llama 3.3 specs →
L

When to use Llama 4 Maverick

  • +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
  • +You need to process long documents (1M context)
  • +Your use case involves open source, self-hosted, multilingual
View full Llama 4 Maverick specs →

Cost Analysis

Both models have similar pricing. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Llama 3.3 monthly cost

$0

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

Llama 4 Maverick monthly cost

$0

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for open source, self-hosted, multilingual, though Llama 3.3 holds an edge in general purpose, multilingual, coding.

Last compared: March 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.3 or Llama 4 Maverick?
In our head-to-head comparison, Llama 4 Maverick leads in 3 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Llama 4 Maverick excels at open source, self-hosted, multilingual, while Llama 3.3 is better suited for general purpose, multilingual, coding. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Llama 3.3 pricing compare to Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.3 charges Free per 1M input tokens and Free per 1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick charges Free per 1M input tokens and Free per 1M output tokens. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.3 and Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.3 supports a 128K token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can process longer documents, codebases, and conversations in a single request. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Llama 3.3 or Llama 4 Maverick for free?
Llama 3.3 is available for free (open-source). Llama 4 Maverick is available for free (open-source). Open-source models can be self-hosted for free but require your own GPU infrastructure.
Which model has better benchmarks, Llama 3.3 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.3 holds arena rank #13, while Llama 4 Maverick holds rank #7. Llama 4 Maverick performs better in overall arena benchmarks, which aggregate human preference ratings across coding, reasoning, and general tasks. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Llama 3.3 or Llama 4 Maverick better for coding?
Llama 3.3 is specifically optimized for coding tasks. Llama 4 Maverick's primary strength is open source, self-hosted, multilingual. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.