Llama 3.3vsLlama 4 Scout
Meta vs Meta — Side-by-side model comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | Llama 3.3 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Arena Rank | #13 | #12 |
| Context Window | 128K | 10M |
| Input Pricing | Free/1M tokens | Free/1M tokens |
| Output Pricing | Free/1M tokens | Free/1M tokens |
| Parameters | 70B | 109B (17B active) |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Best For | General purpose, multilingual, coding | Long context, open source, multilingual |
| Release Date | Dec 6, 2024 | Apr 5, 2025 |
Llama 3.3
Llama 3.3 is Meta's most efficient high-performance model, delivering capability comparable to the much larger Llama 3.1 405B while using only 70 billion parameters. This dramatic efficiency gain means organizations can deploy near-frontier AI capabilities on significantly less hardware. The model supports a 128K context window, strong multilingual performance across dozens of languages, and excellent coding and reasoning abilities. As a fully open-source model, it can be self-hosted, fine-tuned for specific domains, and deployed without API costs. Llama 3.3 has become the de facto standard for organizations that need powerful AI but want to maintain control over their infrastructure and data. It's widely available through cloud providers and can run on consumer GPUs.
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout, developed by Meta AI, is a Mixture-of-Experts model designed for efficient deployment with strong performance across general reasoning, coding, and multilingual tasks. The model uses sparse expert routing to maintain high capability while reducing inference compute requirements. As part of Meta's Llama 4 family, Scout represents the efficiency-optimized variant, targeting developers who need capable AI at manageable computational costs. The model supports long context processing and demonstrates improved instruction following compared to Llama 3 series models. Free and open-source under Meta's license, it can be deployed on enterprise hardware without API costs. Llama 4 Scout continues Meta's commitment to open-source AI development, providing the community with a model that balances capability and deployment practicality for production applications at scale.
Key Differences: Llama 3.3 vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#12) indicating stronger overall performance.
Llama 4 Scout supports a larger context window (10M), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.
Llama 3.3 has 70B parameters vs Llama 4 Scout's 109B (17B active), which affects inference speed and capability.
When to use Llama 3.3
- +Your use case involves general purpose, multilingual, coding
When to use Llama 4 Scout
- +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
- +You need to process long documents (10M context)
- +Your use case involves long context, open source, multilingual
Cost Analysis
Both models have similar pricing. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:
Llama 3.3 monthly cost
$0
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
Llama 4 Scout monthly cost
$0
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
The Verdict
Llama 4 Scout wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for long context, open source, multilingual, though Llama 3.3 holds an edge in general purpose, multilingual, coding.
Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages