← Back to Models
⚖️

Llama 3 70BvsLlama 3.2 90B Vision

Meta AI vs Meta AI — Side-by-side model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision leads 3/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricLlama 3 70BLlama 3.2 90B Vision
Provider
Arena Rank
#11
Context Window
8K
128K
Input Pricing
Free (open)/1M tokens
Free (open)/1M tokens
Output Pricing
Free (open)/1M tokens
Free (open)/1M tokens
Parameters
70B
90B
Open Source
Yes
Yes
Best For
General tasks, fine-tuning, instruction following
Image understanding, visual QA, multimodal tasks
Release Date
Apr 18, 2024
Sep 25, 2024

Llama 3 70B

Llama 3 70B was Meta's flagship open model at launch, significantly outperforming Llama 2 across all benchmarks with improved reasoning, coding, and instruction-following capabilities. It became one of the most downloaded and fine-tuned open models in history, spawning thousands of community variants and establishing Meta's position as the leader in open-source AI development.

View Meta AI profile →

Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Llama 3.2 90B Vision is Meta's first open-source multimodal model, capable of understanding both text and images. With 90 billion parameters, it can analyze charts, diagrams, photographs, and documents while maintaining strong text-only performance. This model represents Meta's push into multimodal AI, enabling the open-source community to build applications that understand visual content without relying on proprietary APIs.

View Meta AI profile →

Key Differences: Llama 3 70B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision

1

Llama 3.2 90B Vision supports a larger context window (128K), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.

2

Llama 3 70B has 70B parameters vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision's 90B, which affects inference speed and capability.

L

When to use Llama 3 70B

  • +Your use case involves general tasks, fine-tuning, instruction following
View full Llama 3 70B specs →
L

When to use Llama 3.2 90B Vision

  • +You need to process long documents (128K context)
  • +Your use case involves image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks
View full Llama 3.2 90B Vision specs →

The Verdict

Llama 3.2 90B Vision wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks, though Llama 3 70B holds an edge in general tasks, fine-tuning, instruction following.

Last compared: March 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3 70B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?
In our head-to-head comparison, Llama 3.2 90B Vision leads in 3 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks, while Llama 3 70B is better suited for general tasks, fine-tuning, instruction following. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Llama 3 70B pricing compare to Llama 3.2 90B Vision?
Llama 3 70B charges Free (open) per 1M input tokens and Free (open) per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision charges Free (open) per 1M input tokens and Free (open) per 1M output tokens. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3 70B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision?
Llama 3 70B supports a 8K token context window, while Llama 3.2 90B Vision supports 128K tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision can process longer documents, codebases, and conversations in a single request. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Llama 3 70B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision for free?
Llama 3 70B is a paid API model starting at Free (open) per 1M input tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision is a paid API model starting at Free (open) per 1M input tokens. Open-source models can be self-hosted for free but require your own GPU infrastructure.
Which model has better benchmarks, Llama 3 70B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?
Llama 3 70B's arena rank is not yet available, while Llama 3.2 90B Vision holds rank #11. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Llama 3 70B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision better for coding?
Llama 3 70B's primary strength is general tasks, fine-tuning, instruction following. Llama 3.2 90B Vision's primary strength is image understanding, visual qa, multimodal tasks. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.