Skip to main content
← Back to Models
⚖️

Pixtral LargevsMistral Medium

Mistral AI vs Mistral AI — Side-by-side model comparison

Mistral Medium leads 3/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricPixtral LargeMistral Medium
Provider
Arena Rank
#16
Context Window
128K
128K
Input Pricing
$2.00/1M tokens
$0.40/1M tokens
Output Pricing
$6.00/1M tokens
$2.00/1M tokens
Parameters
124B
Undisclosed
Open Source
Yes
No
Best For
Image understanding, visual reasoning, documents
Enterprise tasks, European languages
Release Date
Nov 18, 2024
Jan 15, 2025

Pixtral Large

Pixtral Large, developed by Mistral AI, is a multimodal model with 124 billion parameters and a 128K token context window supporting both text and image inputs. The model processes documents, charts, diagrams, screenshots, and photographs alongside text, enabling visual reasoning and document understanding tasks. Pixtral Large handles complex visual question answering, OCR, and image-grounded generation with strong accuracy. As an open-source model, it can be deployed on-premise for organizations with sensitive visual data. Priced at $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens through the API. The model fills a gap in the open-source ecosystem where capable vision-language models remain scarce. Pixtral Large demonstrates Mistral AI's expansion beyond text-only models into the multimodal space dominated by Google and OpenAI.

View Mistral AI profile →

Mistral Medium

Mistral Medium, developed by Mistral AI, is a mid-tier model with a 128K token context window designed for enterprise applications requiring balanced performance and cost. The model handles code generation, structured data extraction, summarization, and multilingual tasks with particular strength in European languages including French, German, Spanish, and Italian. Built in Paris with EU data handling practices, it appeals to organizations prioritizing data sovereignty and regulatory compliance. Priced at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens, it offers competitive pricing for its capability tier. Mistral Medium ranks #16 on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard, reflecting solid mid-range performance. It serves as a practical production choice for workloads that need more capability than Mistral Small but do not require the full power of Mistral Large.

View Mistral AI profile →

Key Differences: Pixtral Large vs Mistral Medium

1

Mistral Medium is 3.3x cheaper on average, making it the better choice for high-volume applications.

2

Pixtral Large is open-source (free to self-host and fine-tune) while Mistral Medium is proprietary (API-only access).

P

When to use Pixtral Large

  • +Quality matters more than cost
  • +You need to self-host or fine-tune the model
  • +Your use case involves image understanding, visual reasoning, documents
View full Pixtral Large specs →
M

When to use Mistral Medium

  • +Budget is a concern and you need cost efficiency
  • +You prefer a managed API without infrastructure overhead
  • +Your use case involves enterprise tasks, european languages
View full Mistral Medium specs →

Cost Analysis

At current pricing, Mistral Medium is 3.3x more affordable than Pixtral Large. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Pixtral Large monthly cost

$400

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

Mistral Medium monthly cost

$120

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Mistral Medium wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for enterprise tasks, european languages, though Pixtral Large holds an edge in image understanding, visual reasoning, documents.

Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pixtral Large or Mistral Medium?
In our head-to-head comparison, Mistral Medium leads in 3 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Mistral Medium excels at enterprise tasks, european languages, while Pixtral Large is better suited for image understanding, visual reasoning, documents. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Pixtral Large pricing compare to Mistral Medium?
Pixtral Large charges $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Medium charges $0.40 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Medium is the more affordable option, approximately 3.3x cheaper on average. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Pixtral Large and Mistral Medium?
Pixtral Large supports a 128K token context window, while Mistral Medium supports 128K tokens. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Pixtral Large or Mistral Medium for free?
Pixtral Large is a paid API model starting at $2.00 per 1M input tokens. Mistral Medium is a paid API model starting at $0.40 per 1M input tokens. Open-source models can be self-hosted for free but require your own GPU infrastructure.
Which model has better benchmarks, Pixtral Large or Mistral Medium?
Pixtral Large's arena rank is not yet available, while Mistral Medium holds rank #16. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Pixtral Large or Mistral Medium better for coding?
Pixtral Large's primary strength is image understanding, visual reasoning, documents. Mistral Medium's primary strength is enterprise tasks, european languages. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.