Pixtral LargevsMistral Medium
Mistral AI vs Mistral AI — Side-by-side model comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | Pixtral Large | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Arena Rank | — | #16 |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Pricing | $2.00/1M tokens | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Output Pricing | $6.00/1M tokens | $2.00/1M tokens |
| Parameters | 124B | Undisclosed |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Best For | Image understanding, visual reasoning, documents | Enterprise tasks, European languages |
| Release Date | Nov 18, 2024 | Jan 15, 2025 |
Pixtral Large
Pixtral Large, developed by Mistral AI, is a multimodal model with 124 billion parameters and a 128K token context window supporting both text and image inputs. The model processes documents, charts, diagrams, screenshots, and photographs alongside text, enabling visual reasoning and document understanding tasks. Pixtral Large handles complex visual question answering, OCR, and image-grounded generation with strong accuracy. As an open-source model, it can be deployed on-premise for organizations with sensitive visual data. Priced at $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens through the API. The model fills a gap in the open-source ecosystem where capable vision-language models remain scarce. Pixtral Large demonstrates Mistral AI's expansion beyond text-only models into the multimodal space dominated by Google and OpenAI.
View Mistral AI profile →Mistral Medium
Mistral Medium, developed by Mistral AI, is a mid-tier model with a 128K token context window designed for enterprise applications requiring balanced performance and cost. The model handles code generation, structured data extraction, summarization, and multilingual tasks with particular strength in European languages including French, German, Spanish, and Italian. Built in Paris with EU data handling practices, it appeals to organizations prioritizing data sovereignty and regulatory compliance. Priced at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens, it offers competitive pricing for its capability tier. Mistral Medium ranks #16 on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard, reflecting solid mid-range performance. It serves as a practical production choice for workloads that need more capability than Mistral Small but do not require the full power of Mistral Large.
View Mistral AI profile →Key Differences: Pixtral Large vs Mistral Medium
Mistral Medium is 3.3x cheaper on average, making it the better choice for high-volume applications.
Pixtral Large is open-source (free to self-host and fine-tune) while Mistral Medium is proprietary (API-only access).
When to use Pixtral Large
- +Quality matters more than cost
- +You need to self-host or fine-tune the model
- +Your use case involves image understanding, visual reasoning, documents
When to use Mistral Medium
- +Budget is a concern and you need cost efficiency
- +You prefer a managed API without infrastructure overhead
- +Your use case involves enterprise tasks, european languages
Cost Analysis
At current pricing, Mistral Medium is 3.3x more affordable than Pixtral Large. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:
Pixtral Large monthly cost
$400
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
Mistral Medium monthly cost
$120
100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)
The Verdict
Mistral Medium wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for enterprise tasks, european languages, though Pixtral Large holds an edge in image understanding, visual reasoning, documents.
Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages