Skip to main content
← Back to Models
⚖️

Reka CorevsGPT-o1

Reka AI vs OpenAI — Side-by-side model comparison

Reka Core leads 3/5 categories

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricReka CoreGPT-o1
Provider
Arena Rank
#17
#3
Context Window
128K
200K
Input Pricing
$2.00/1M tokens
$15.00/1M tokens
Output Pricing
$2.00/1M tokens
$60.00/1M tokens
Parameters
67B
Undisclosed
Open Source
No
No
Best For
Multimodal reasoning, video understanding, multilingual
Complex reasoning, math, science, coding
Release Date
Apr 15, 2024
Dec 17, 2024

Reka Core

Reka Core, developed by Reka AI, is a multimodal model that natively processes text, images, video, and audio inputs in a unified architecture. Founded by former Google DeepMind researchers who helped build Google's Gemini, Reka AI brings deep expertise in multimodal training to this flagship model. Reka Core demonstrates competitive performance against larger models on general reasoning and multimodal understanding benchmarks. Its ability to process video and audio natively, rather than through separate encoder pipelines, enables more coherent cross-modal understanding. The model targets enterprise applications requiring versatile multimodal AI, including document analysis with embedded media, video understanding, and audio-visual content processing. Reka AI has positioned Reka Core as a practical alternative for organizations seeking multimodal capabilities without dependence on the largest AI providers.

View Reka AI profile →

GPT-o1

GPT-o1 is OpenAI's first dedicated reasoning model, introducing the concept of 'thinking tokens' where the model reasons through problems step-by-step before generating a response. This approach significantly improves performance on complex mathematics, coding challenges, and scientific reasoning compared to standard language models. With a 200K token context window, o1 can process lengthy technical documents while applying deep reasoning. It excels on competition-level math problems, PhD-level science questions, and complex coding tasks that require careful logical thinking. While slower and more expensive than GPT-4o due to the reasoning overhead, o1 delivers substantially better results on tasks that benefit from deliberate, structured problem-solving rather than quick pattern matching.

View OpenAI profile →

Key Differences: Reka Core vs GPT-o1

1

GPT-o1 ranks higher in arena benchmarks (#3) indicating stronger overall performance.

2

Reka Core is 18.8x cheaper on average, making it the better choice for high-volume applications.

3

GPT-o1 supports a larger context window (200K), allowing it to process longer documents in a single request.

R

When to use Reka Core

  • +Budget is a concern and you need cost efficiency
  • +Your use case involves multimodal reasoning, video understanding, multilingual
View full Reka Core specs →
G

When to use GPT-o1

  • +You need the highest quality output based on arena rankings
  • +Quality matters more than cost
  • +You need to process long documents (200K context)
  • +Your use case involves complex reasoning, math, science, coding
View full GPT-o1 specs →

Cost Analysis

At current pricing, Reka Core is 18.8x more affordable than GPT-o1. For a typical enterprise workload processing 100M tokens per month:

Reka Core monthly cost

$200

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

GPT-o1 monthly cost

$3,750

100M tokens/mo (50/50 in/out)

The Verdict

Reka Core wins our head-to-head comparison with 3 out of 5 category wins. It's the stronger choice for multimodal reasoning, video understanding, multilingual, though GPT-o1 holds an edge in complex reasoning, math, science, coding.

Last compared: April 2026 · Data sourced from public benchmarks and official pricing pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Reka Core or GPT-o1?
In our head-to-head comparison, Reka Core leads in 3 out of 5 categories (arena rank, context window, input pricing, output pricing, and parameters). Reka Core excels at multimodal reasoning, video understanding, multilingual, while GPT-o1 is better suited for complex reasoning, math, science, coding. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, budget, and use case.
How does Reka Core pricing compare to GPT-o1?
Reka Core charges $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-o1 charges $15.00 per 1M input tokens and $60.00 per 1M output tokens. Reka Core is the more affordable option, approximately 18.8x cheaper on average. For high-volume production workloads, the pricing difference can significantly impact total cost of ownership.
What is the context window difference between Reka Core and GPT-o1?
Reka Core supports a 128K token context window, while GPT-o1 supports 200K tokens. GPT-o1 can process longer documents, codebases, and conversations in a single request. Context window size matters most for tasks involving long documents, large codebases, or extended conversations.
Can I use Reka Core or GPT-o1 for free?
Reka Core is a paid API model starting at $2.00 per 1M input tokens. GPT-o1 is a paid API model starting at $15.00 per 1M input tokens.
Which model has better benchmarks, Reka Core or GPT-o1?
Reka Core holds arena rank #17, while GPT-o1 holds rank #3. GPT-o1 performs better in overall arena benchmarks, which aggregate human preference ratings across coding, reasoning, and general tasks. Note that benchmarks don't capture every use case — we recommend testing both models on your specific tasks.
Is Reka Core or GPT-o1 better for coding?
Reka Core's primary strength is multimodal reasoning, video understanding, multilingual. GPT-o1 is specifically optimized for coding tasks. For coding specifically, arena rank and code-specific benchmarks are the best indicators of performance.